Who actually wants more than the traditional full power 85nm e-bike.
I dont need more. I miss the days when pretty much all full power e's were very similar power. We could go on group e rides and every one had a similar amount of grunt and when it came to a challenge like riding up a tech section then whoever cleaned that section was the better rider on the day. Now full power e's are wildy different and nz with different top speeds too. Now its not who cleaned that section best due to skill but who turned up on the most powerful bike...
Ahhh the good old days.
'traditionnal full power ...' is abusive, since '85 Nm - 500 / 600 W peakt lasted maybe 3-5 years.
More power need a lot of skill to be effectively applied when climbing up black trails or trializing (this is no A.I. driving)
I think the M1 power will become the reference (whatever the arms race), and the way it's delivered will be hard rivaled.
In the end, the rider's skill will always prevail.
But i can agree that more than 120 NM / 1000W peak (i only use 800 W peak / 100 NM on my M1) is useless / out of topic / irrelevant EXCEPT for very specific use.
on another note, i think that the rise of CVT / speedbox will reshuffle everything.
Speed limit will remains, and contain the abuse (as long as peoples dont derestrict)
Also, the % assist is not always relevant, nor the power, since rider's weight affect things more (energy consumption, power needed to benefit from the same assistance than a lighter rider - at the same speed).
I think we should start to discuss and label thing like this : Nm and W of peak power PAR unit of rider + bike mass (lbs or kg) TO BE RELEVANT.