? 4 kg the BT700 now ? and they doesn't propose the 835 ? have you explanation ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
? 4 kg the BT700 now ? and they doesn't propose the 835 ? have you explanation ?
battery dimensions in mm, not weight!? 4 kg the BT700 now ? and they doesn't propose the 835 ? have you explanation ?
charly have share it several months ago. raison why i have ordered onebattery dimensions in mm, not weight!
and I put the geometry for xl size, I didn't see a table with xl!
I haven't seen it, it won't be a waste. Do you have the dimensions of the battery?charly have share it several months ago. raison why i have ordered one
View attachment 186301
no, not received. but may be the same than CEF50 ?I haven't seen it, it won't be a waste. Do you have the dimensions of the battery?
I'm trying to modify it so there could be a yoke with a flip chip to allow 29 or 27.5.200km in! Bike has been a blast. Pretty impress with the battery life and the power of the motor.
One thing I wish for the bike right now is that, a link for an MX setup. Or a rear triangle for 27.5 setup.
Current setup is a 170mm front and a 65mm stroke on the rear.
Bike is pretty linear, I needed two token on my rear shock and I'm just about 120lbs.
I typically get away with one only. Overall, pretty rad bike for it's price.
so can't an offset bushing be used instead of a flip chip?I'm trying to modify it so there could be a yoke with a flip chip to allow 29 or 27.5.
I've been checking some CNC pages that they fabricate based on a step file and it's Circa $200, but I believe that number could go down if there's a big order, or also hopefully Jean can fabricate them in China and include it, i'll share it with him as soon as I have it ready and tested by 3d printing it.
Before working on longer link (that simulate flip chip), have you checked if you can lowered the rear triangle beyond the 205 mm of the original shock absorber ? impossible on the Cef50, raison why i can't use it in mulletI'm trying to modify it so there could be a yoke with a flip chip to allow 29 or 27.5.
I've been checking some CNC pages that they fabricate based on a step file and it's Circa $200, but I believe that number could go down if there's a big order, or also hopefully Jean can fabricate them in China and include it, i'll share it with him as soon as I have it ready and tested by 3d printing it.
Yes, I do have the step for the frame so extending it to a level that the rear triangle doesnt interfere with the frame by going lower.Before working on longer link (that simulate flip chip), have you checked if you can lowered the rear triangle beyond the 205 mm of the original shock absorber ? impossible on the Cef50, raison why i can't use it in mullet
Thank you for your hard work. $200 is really steep. But I'll be down to start saving.I'm trying to modify it so there could be a yoke with a flip chip to allow 29 or 27.5.
I've been checking some CNC pages that they fabricate based on a step file and it's Circa $200, but I believe that number could go down if there's a big order, or also hopefully Jean can fabricate them in China and include it, i'll share it with him as soon as I have it ready and tested by 3d printing it.
Dans ce cas, il serait peut-être plus facile de remplacer un amortisseur arrière 205 par un 215 classique ?Oui, j’ai la marche pour le cadre donc l’étendre à un niveau où le triangle arrière n’interfère pas avec le cadre en descendant plus bas.
C’est difficile de trouver l’équilibre du nombre de mm que je peux déplacer plus loin sans interférence, car la vraie différence est de 19 mm pour garder exactement le même BB, le mieux à faire est de 10 mm en rendant le lien 3,3 mm plus long entre l’amortisseur et l’autre lien, en arrivant à un point médian