Heckler SL vs. Trek Fuel Ex-e:
I’ve been thinking about adding a Heckler SL to the quiver recently, so was curious as to how similar or different I might expect it to be from my existing Fuel Ex-e. I find my Ex-e with a 160mm fork and mullet setup to be the most perfect combination of agility, capability and comfortable fit I’ve ever ridden in a trail/light enduro bike. So I was curious as to how the Heckler SL numbers compared. Trail demo’s aren’t an option anywhere around here and it’s tough to tell much from a parking lot ride.
Running the specs for a size medium through a geometry calculator, it turns out that the geo between the stock HSL & mullet Ex-e are so incredibly close that they may feel virtually identical in fit. So similar that now I’m wondering if the 2 bikes would even differ enough from each other to justify having both. I would imagine that the slightly (+/- 1cm) longer shock travel, longer wheelbase, longer reach, and shorter stack might make the HSL a slightly more confident descender in my preferred riding terrain of steep natural tech, especially if upping the fork travel to 170mm.
I love the TQ motor system’s power, noise level, reliability and user interface, so the increased power of the Ride 60 isn’t much of a deciding factor. The larger battery and more efficient motor are plus’s for the Fazua, at the cost of additional weight. I’ve got my Ex-e down to 38.1 lbs (17.3 kg), which is ridiculously fun and playful. I think it would be tough to get the HSL much below 41 lbs without sacrificing its trail capabilities. It will probably all come down to the feel of the suspension to see which one wins out in different terrain. That and I’d love to see Fazua ditch that hokey ring controller for something more practical and robust.
Anyhow, just thought I’d put this out there I case anyone is on the fence and trying to make a choice between the two. Oh, and there are some fantastic deals on Ex-e’s right now too.
View attachment 152510