Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now that is what we call dual high flow BSNo way. Looks so real ;-). I love the two valves on the front wheel in particular. #innovation
Two pressure chamber is a real thing for mtb tiresWasn't there a guy on this forum who wanted to install two tubes in his wheels. Maybe it's his bike .......
View attachment 179736
That is what life is still like if you stay off the internet.Does anybody else long for the days when stuff used to just get released, and if you were in the market for something like it, you’d look and say ‘that looks alright’ and then you’d buy it?!![]()
Separate compression and rebound. That’s why the rebound valve is red.I love the two valves on the front wheel in particular. #innovation
No worries man, I'm just glad to hear that the forum isn't preventing users from sharing info they've gathered elsewhere.Please feel free to ask any questions you may have.
I deleted the two images myself, as my username could reveal my identity and I don’t want to get into trouble over the embargo.
I don't think this crosses any lines, so, from what I've seen they just use the same disks front and back (probably for ease/consistency) which have the speed sensor cut outs in.On the Pro model, in the pic it looked like there was a wheelspeed sensor on the front hub, just as there is typically placed on the back wheel. Does that mean the bikes with the Magura Gustav brakes will have the Magura ABS system? I haven't seen that mentioned in any of the published specs, but couldn't think of any other reason why a 2nd sensor would be required.
Used to have Schwalbe Procore, unfortenatly didn't pickup...Two pressure chamber is a real thing for mtb tires
View attachment 179747
You should try the OPTIS then. It's much lighter and easier to live with.Used to have Schwalbe Procore, unfortenatly didn't pickup...
Best system I've ever used on MTB!
Allowed to ride with 12psi on the rear tire on a very wet, greasy and cold ride!
(I was around 85kg ready to ride + 16kg bike. Normal pressure, was between 24 and 28psi)
Removable battery is great for people living in apartments.. But it also doesn't solve my problem. It is lame to ride around with another battery in the backpack. Need integrated solution.Removable battery is definitely a plus but does not solve the main problem for me. Still, a good step, without a doubt!
No, the removable one is the 800Wh battery.Removable battery is great for people living in apartments.. But it also doesn't solve my problem. It is lame to ride around with another battery in the backpack. Need integrated solution.
Only 700wh will have removable battery? What about the bigger one?
OK. Im not sure what 27% nore efficient means in this context. Definitely not 27% more range?No, the removable one is the 800Wh battery.
The 700Wh battery is non removable but due to a better cooling and some other specs, is about 27% more efficient and that is why it will be only available in the top spec models of the new Amflow
Probably some confusion with battery energy density, it is expected to be ~700Wh and weigh roughly the same weight as the 600Wh, that represents a 17% increase in energy for the same weight.OK. Im not sure what 27% nore efficient means in this context. Definitely not 27% more range?
that the optimized 700Wh is roughly equivalent to 889WhOK. Im not sure what 27% nore efficient means in this context. Definitely not 27% more range?
700wh will never give the same range as 889wh. Efficiency can be around motor/controller.that the optimized 700Wh is roughly equivalent to 889Wh
That doesn’t make sense. WH is the available energy. If the 27% figure is true, the implication is that the weight of the 700wh battery is 27% less than the same battery would have been with old cells.that the optimized 700Wh is roughly equivalent to 889Wh
Damn, the hype around this system is breaking the laws of physicsthat the optimized 700Wh is roughly equivalent to 889Wh
Will see...maybe is something related to new battery cells and an optimized cooling that makes the system be more efficientDamn, the hype around this system is breaking the laws of physics
Different chemistry with more energy to weight ratio might help pack more WH into the same space/ save some weight if we look at the cells only:Will see...maybe is something related to new battery cells and an optimized cooling that makes the system be more efficient
Ok, great, but I would rather have a 900-1k battery that is the same weight and size as the current 800….That doesn’t make sense. WH is the available energy. If the 27% figure is true, the implication is that the weight of the 700wh battery is 27% less than the same battery would have been with old cells.
Since the battery is comprised of things other than cells (packaging, circuits, heat sinks) the real number is likely to be closer to 15%
another way to think about this - the new 700wh battery is approximately the same size and weight as the old 600wh battery
Thats the hope with molicells, slightly more weight, higher WH.Ok, great, but I would rather have a 900-1k battery that is the same weight and size as the current 800….
Come on, dude. I thought you were loving all the Avinox banter ???I just wish DJI would announce these new machines and thus eliminate all this mindnumbing speculation.