You've completely lost me there .. Pedal ? There's the gear pedal .. and the rear brake pedal ..
Yup .. I did the reset - that gave me a good chunk more distance and anyone with a potential range issue should try the mission control reset.
BUT - On Turbo and leaving it on Turbo I get on average 30k's (nope, I don't ride like that all the time) My highest "Eco only" on various attempted settings is 45k. (which is my highest, not my average). Normally these average out at 1200m climbing ish. Though yesterday I was flat after only 400m climbing, but it was very muddy.
I think if you have "undulating" - either little undulations or big undulations - you eat power.
My other theory is this : (the figures aren't exact they're just representative for visualisation)
If I'm in Eco, it's generally more of a plod - yes, I'll still go as fast as I can, so I'm normally using eco to it's highest - but it's still a plod. Lets say you're plodding up a hill at 5kph and using 120w. If I was in Turbo I'd be using say 600w, but I'd be doing 20kph - for whatever psychological/physiological effect, when I'm in Turbo - we work better together and MY average power output is higher than when I'm in Eco. (I'm puny, so Blevo says I only add 500w on the power meter).
Now if you look at that situation. To get up the hill in Eco would take me 10 minutes using an average of 120w. The same hill in Turbo and I'd get up it in 2.5 minutes using an average 600w.
So whilst I'm using a lot more power, I'm going a lot faster, So yes, I'm using 5 times the power per second, but cover 4 times the distance per second. So the Wh/Km is not actually that massively different. And ... IT'S A LOT MORE FUN !