Christian050567
Member
Why not? In my opinion he did explain all painpoints of the last months. I believe him.that podcast was not positive for Flossmann
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why not? In my opinion he did explain all painpoints of the last months. I believe him.that podcast was not positive for Flossmann
he was the ceo ALL THE TIMEWhy not? In my opinion he did explain all painpoints of the last months. I believe him.
A bit touchy, are we?For your information I ran a successful software company specialising in Mathematical Programming for 35 years until I got bought out, so shove that wherever that needs to go to stop your patronising claptrap. Thanks.
According to what he said in the podcast, no. They hired a CEO in 2020 (if I remember right) and he took over again at some point before the bankruptcy.he was the ceo ALL THE TIME
according to their financial reports he was listed as geschäftsführer ALL THE TIME, therefore i rather base my information on this legal document than on what he says in public…According to what he said in the podcast, no. They hired a CEO in 2020 (if I remember right) and he took over again at some point before the bankruptcy.
According to what he said in the podcast, no. They hired a CEO in 2020 (if I remember right) and he took over again at some point before the bankruptcy.
Mine didn’t…… they lent on canyon and made them refund me…… they were not amused that Canyon we’re refusing to refund goods that are not fit for purpose (there was a safety hazard report in the UK that automatically triggers the not fit for purpose clause).Oh, that’s alright then, I mean, credit card companies just suck up the loss don’t they and not pass it on to customers…
I can understand the reticence of folks to put that trust back in place, and YT will need to do a lot more than words in a podcast to rebuild it.
Mine didn’t…… they lent on canyon and made them refund me…… they were not amused that Canyon we’re refusing to refund goods that are not fit for purpose (there was a safety hazard report in the UK that automatically triggers the not fit for purpose clause).
I liked the bike, Canyons evasive behaviour soured my experience of their brand and I would rather stick a fork in my eye than purchase one of their products.
Thank you for that reminder.Wow does anyone have something to add about the DJI Decoy?
Wow does anyone have something to add about the DJI Decoy?
why do you need a dji bike from yt? where do you expect it to be better than whats on the market/coming up?Wow does anyone have something to add about the DJI Decoy?
It would be the best of both worlds, a good quality bike that rides like you stole it and the best motor currently out there.why do you need a dji bike from yt? where do you expect it to be better than whats on the market/coming up?
According to the podcast there is a prototypeI don’t think there’s much to say at this point is there, it’s early days and it likely doesn’t exist beyond a CAD drawing?
According to the podcast there is a prototype
NoIf anybody has seen it, unlikely they would be able to talk about it yet.
Did the podcast mention when it might be scheduled for launch?
The interviewer said he saw a prototype and Markus said it would come "soon". It sounded pre planned to generate curiosity.If anybody has seen it, unlikely they would be able to talk about it yet.
Did the podcast mention when it might be scheduled for launch?
May i ask why you got bought out and was it worth 35 years of effortFor your information I ran a successful software company specialising in Mathematical Programming for 35 years until I got bought out, so shove that wherever that needs to go to stop your patronising claptrap. Thanks.
YT obviously lost control of their cash flow to the point that creditors got pissed off enough to call it a day and take a percentage on the €£$. Speaks for itself.
A small software company is nothing like a global business like YT. Jus' saying'...For your information I ran a successful software company specialising in Mathematical Programming for 35 years until I got bought out, so shove that wherever that needs to go to stop your patronising claptrap. Thanks.
Was it a small software company ?A small software company is nothing like a global business like YT. Jus' saying'...
Annual turnover was small beer when compared to YT, but the same principles apply. Just sayin'.A small software company is nothing like a global business like YT. Jus' saying'...
Perhaps. I assume whatever deal or contract YT had with Bosch was under the old entity anyway.A small software company is nothing like a global business like YT. Jus' saying'...
Really? You had global supply chains that required orders years in advance? You had to deal with global shipping both inbound and outbound? You had to guesstimate the direction the industry would take taking into account the lead times involved?Annual turnover was small beer when compared to YT, but the same principles apply. Just sayin'.
Perhaps. I assume whatever deal or contract YT had with Bosch was under the old entity anyway.
Perhaps YT thinks it's better just to move over to DJI than try and negotiate something new with Bosch. It seems Bosch like to lock manufactures into multi year deals and pre agreed order volumes. DJI might be more flexible in that regard.
You just summed up my life drinking Guinness in France.Really? You had global supply chains that required orders years in advance? You had to deal with global shipping both inbound and outbound? You had to guesstimate the direction the industry would take taking into account the lead times involved?