DogEvader
New Member
So no to both versions of the 9.7? The weak motor and small battery are positives for meDon’t do it, motor is feeble and battery is inadequate.
I‘m still tempted by one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So no to both versions of the 9.7? The weak motor and small battery are positives for meDon’t do it, motor is feeble and battery is inadequate.
I‘m still tempted by one.
It’s the reason I bought an 2023 9.7 at the end of 2024. It was A LOT cheaper than the 2024 model.Getting closer to pulling the trigger on a 9.7 with the current sale prices. LBS is selling the 2024 model of the 9.7 for about $1200 more than the 2023 model.
Would there be any reason to go for the more expensive 2024 model of the 9.7? Both bikes have the same spec, looks like the only difference is colour.
Thanks everyone for all the posts so far, this thread has been super helpful.
I was being flippant. I’m tempted by the EXe package as a normal bike with just a bit of assistance. I’m not yet resigned to seeking Amflow levels of assistance.So no to both versions of the 9.7? The weak motor and small battery are positives for me![]()
Boy oh boy if true that would align perfectly with what I'm looking for.From Simon on the EXe owners page on Facebook
I've come across some unconfirmed rumors about the new Trek EXe model:
• Battery: Main models get a 580Wh battery. Cheaper versions get 360Wh, but can be upgraded to 580Wh.
• Frame: Looks similar to Trek Slash E but without high pivot. Carbon frame only—no headset angle adjust like the current alloy version.
• Sizing: XXL frame size will be added.
• Suspension: 160mm front travel. Some models will use a new Fox shock, not yet released—visually similar to the Specialized Genie shock.
• Motor: New TQ motor with 60Nm torque. Same size/weight as current 50Nm motor.
• Backwards compatibility: New 60Nm motor can fit current EXE frames. Just needs a firmware update. Same battery life expected. No confirmation if Trek/TQ will sell it as an upgrade.
Can anybody confirm or deny?
I am using 30mm spacers plus a riser bar with 35mm. His bar height give me confidence on technical ride. However I'm 1m90 tall and all bikes are too low in their stock configuration.
You can remove the handlebar remote entirely and just change the assist levels using the button on the screen, if being stealthy is very important.I am working to make my EXe even more stealth. Moving the TQ handlebar power switch to the right side. I can simply flip it around and the up/down is correct. However, for shifter clearance, I need the millimeter that the power cable takes up. Does anyone know if it’s possible to reverse the power level on the switch? So that I can mount the switch power cable up on the right side of the bars, with top being up and bottom down?
Same here, 0 regrets !I was being flippant. I’m tempted by the EXe package as a normal bike with just a bit of assistance. I’m not yet resigned to seeking Amflow levels of assistance.
I am using the full pack that came with the stock bars and I have the loam 50mm rise bar. I needed to get my bars as high as I could. Additionally I have the 160mm fork upgrade. Climbing technical stuff got a little harder, I have to move up on the seat and get my weight forward. However, everything else got way betterHow many spacers are people running under their stem compared to bar rise? I feel the EXE has a pretty low front?
I'm running mine in high, mainly to get slightly more reach. It definitely feels like I get way less pedal strikes. Overall slamming the stem, going high and having a 50 mm handlebar was a major transformation. Didnt relize the 160mm fork ate up so much reach for my 177cmAnyone running their EXE in high? Now my trails have dried up the roots nearly got me a couple of times!
Can’t see a huge shift is geometry. Can roll/raise bars if needed.
No one any advise?Does anyone knows the tune of the fox float x for the Fuel EXE?
I'm about to install a fox float x and have two dampers with different tunes.
1. Description: 2024, FLOAT X, F-S, K, 2pos-Adj, Trunnion, Evol LV, Cube, Stereo Hybrid 160 27.5, 205, 65, 0.4 Spacer, CMSSB025, RM002+, Rezi BVMLHB01LM, CB-CA7-1901_Matt/YS-728_Matt, Neutral Logo, OE
2. Description: 2024_22, FLOAT X, F-S, K, 2pos-Adj, Trunnion, Evol LV, Cube, Stereo Hybrid 160 750, 205, 65, 0.9 Spacer, CXLLH002, RM, Rezi LMB3, YS-728 Matte_STEALTH/YS-728 Matte_STEALTH, Neutral Logo
Which one fits better? First one has Compression medium, last one compression extra low.
I'm a more heavy rider with 92kg
185cm tall here on a large EXe. Flip chip in high helps with pedal strikes and dosent change the geo much with a 160mm fork. 27mm spacers underneath a 40mm stem with 20mm rise bars.I'm running mine in high, mainly to get slightly more reach. It definitely feels like I get way less pedal strikes. Overall slamming the stem, going high and having a 50 mm handlebar was a major transformation. Didnt relize the 160mm fork ate up so much reach for my 177cm
I'm running mine in high, mainly to get slightly more reach. It definitely feels like I get way less pedal strikes. Overall slamming the stem, going high and having a 50 mm handlebar was a major transformation. Didnt relize the 160mm fork ate up so much reach for my 177cm
Anyone using oneups threadless carrier? Thinking of getting one. Just wondered how much bulk it adds to the top of the stem. I would have to run a 5mm spacer above the stem to get the claimed distance needed to install (220mm).
I have it, very handy! Making adjustments is a bit of a pain compared to a star nut, finding the sweet spot of torque takes some playing but I wouldn't go back. You definitely want 5mm spacer on top, stem doesn't lock down well without it
I have it, very handy! Making adjustments is a bit of a pain compared to a star nut, finding the sweet spot of torque takes some playing but I wouldn't go back. You definitely want 5mm spacer on top, stem doesn't lock down well without it
I just flipped mine this week after reading your post. I have the 160mm upgrade fork, and 50mm rise bars. I lowered my seat 10mm to accommodate the higher bottom bracket. In my first ride I immediately noticed less pedal strikes (my EXe strikes a lot). I did not notice anything difference on downhills. Climbing technical steep is a bit harder to keep the front end down, I blame that on the front end. Not sure if the flip had anything to do with that. Looking for feedback.Anyone running their EXE in high? Now my trails have dried up the roots nearly got me a couple of times!
Can’t see a huge shift is geometry. Can roll/raise bars if needed.
I did laps low/high/low/high. Kinda yo yo style. Pretty flat rocky and technical all mountain terrain. High wins here. Less pedal strikes and navigates tight corners better. Not much difference in the up/down segments.I just flipped mine this week after reading your post. I have the 160mm upgrade fork, and 50mm rise bars. I lowered my seat 10mm to accommodate the higher bottom bracket. In my first ride I immediately noticed less pedal strikes (my EXe strikes a lot). I did not notice anything difference on downhills. Climbing technical steep is a bit harder to keep the front end down, I blame that on the front end. Not sure if the flip had anything to do with that. Looking for feedback.
FFS. Only just had a new motor fitted and now got another error.
Err 5401 Dri C.
Powers on, gives code, turns off. Was all working yesterday.
ERR 5401 DRV CONN
Communication error between Drive Unit and Display
Broken cable.... loose connector....![]()
Just reseat (ie unplug and plug) all the connectors including the main connector to the batteryWho knows. Still under warranty so don’t want to start meddling too much.
Just reseat (ie unplug and plug) all the connectors including the main connector to the battery