Dale10ellis10
Member
without a doubt get the butchers off and get some DH’s or similar on
Levo SL Gen 1 SL Comp Owners Thoughts?
- Thread starter AaronMc
- Start date
without a doubt get the butchers off and get some DH’s or similar on
MLX John
Active member
Curious as to how you got it under 36 pounds. You must have some seriously light wheels/tires. No dropper?
I took the battery out for a few rides, only rode with the range extender. Could crank out some 15 mile rides with about 20-25% battery left. Lots of modified eco. Down to about 35 pounds without the battery, range extender adds 2.2 pounds to that. You can feel the difference on the trail, takes some getting used to. Bike definitely feels more nimble/maneuverable overall, but less planted on straighter high speed sections/rock gardens.
I've replaced just about everything on my L Expert. Some lighter, some heavier. On the light side - X01 cassette, derailleur, shifter, Next R carbon bars, Deity stem, Praxis carbon crank arms,WTB TI rail saddle, Roval Carbon w/350 hubs (carried over from the Hightower that I sold)
On the heavier side - Pike Ultimate, DPX2, 2.6 tires Butcher Grid Trail front Purgatory Grid rear
39.22# 17.79kg with XT pedals, swat tool, bottle cage, setup tubeless (no range extender)
Last edited:
Carbon comp, large, xt drivetrain, xt brakes, light bicycle wheels, I9 1/1 hubs, Fox 36 performance elite 160 mm, DVO Topaz 3 shock, Vittoria peyote tires, 2.35, sq labs bar, xt pedals, stock dropper Post and seat. The stock wheels and NX drivetrain are very heavy.
I used the park scale. The bike was 42 lbs stock on the same scale.
Is that with pedals and steerer tube tool? Mine is
And I’m more interested in the 6lbs weight loss than ultimate weight
Yeah I'm really loving my Fox 38 170mm.. Love it so much I had to buy one for my analog bike
I dont understand why anyone would say it needs better brakes because of the added weight, it only weighs 8pounds more than a burly trail bike FFS. Thats only a 4% increase in combined rider and bike weight( assuming 200 pound rider and kit weight)!!
because the brakes suck even on an acoustic bike
KeithR
Well-known member
Got to admit that - having got used to them - I really like the Guide REs on my SL, my first Sram brakes.
I have plenty of experience with Shimano and Magura, and the Srams want for nothing in comparison: they're definitely more about modulation than outright stopping power, but I like that.
Plenty of people seem to like the Guide Rs as well:
Are Sram Guide R brakes crap? - Pinkbike Forum
Are Sram Guide R brakes crap? in Mechanics' Lounge
Last edited:
Norcalsl
Active member
I have not taken the downtube battery out...yet. Pretty sure that my next move. I'll just use the range extender battery, since most of the time I'm riding unassisted and rarely use more than 20% of my main battery on my typical 2-hour ride.
Removing it is pretty straight forward:
Last edited:
Dont know for certain but I wouldnt think removing 2 pounds from the overall unit weight is going to make masses of difference. I have had my battery out and was surprised by its lack of mass.
Goodmango13
Member
Hey G....how easily does a 2.6 tire fit on the SL? I've been reluctant to order my SL simply bcz tech at Spesh said nothing bigger than the stock 2.3 is gonna work. thanks for the reply
MLX John
Active member
I had a 2.6 Ground Control, and currently have a 2.6 Purgatory. Plenty of clearance, no issues. Running 22 psii.
Goodmango13
Member
Thanks John.....but Jeez.... what took you so long to respond?! Ha Ha
I checked my park scale by weighing my weights. Within 1oz with 5, 10 and 20lb weights. So pretty close.
Yeah I did it a couple of months ago and have yet to put it back in. I'm been using the range extender whenever i felt like i needed a boost or need to get out for a quick lap. I honestly don't see a day when I put it back in. The only crappy thing of the range extender is having to carry your water bottle on your hip (currently looking to buy the RaceFace Hip Bag w/ hydration). I forgot how crappy it was to carry a water bottle on my hip before. Anyway, the removal is even easier than the video. Take off all 6 bolts instead and no need to take off the cranks. I bet now that i know how to do it, I can do it in under 20mins.
Might be placebo or might actually be a difference but I would say it's definitely noticeable. So much so that I wore elbow pads for 3-4 rides as I had 2-3 rides without the battery where my front tire was sliding out. I was used to riding with the downtube battery weight and with it gone, I must say that the traction wasn't what it had been because my body position was used to having that weight. I've adjusted now and no more elbow pads needed but I can pretty confidently say that it did make a difference.
And i would add that i had a regular water bottle in the cage and not the range extender for the first few rides so it wasn't just 2 pounds net difference. It was probably closer to 3lbs.
I WILL say that I think the range extender battery drains ALOT quicker. I feel like i'll do a quick lap or two and i'll be close or completely out of juice from the extender whereas I felt when i had the downtube battery, i could do the same two laps and i'll still have 80%+ left.
I rode butchers on front and rear on my last bike (2015 comp evo Stumpy) both 27.5 tires. I had no traction issues. I had minions prior to that set and turns out it was probably overkill as I didn't notice any discernible difference traction wise after switching to Butchers.
Hugh-Jazz
Member
My comp carbon (size large) and my girlfriend’s comp alloy (size medium) were at 2.5lbs lighter for mine. She has Saint pedals and I have XTR pedals. More or less 2 lbs lighter for the carbon frame.
Pan
New Member
Insight on SL for women Needed
I got a standard emtb (trek rail 7) and my wife feels a full emtb may be too much of a bike for her at 135 pound (61 kg). She is tall and would need a large. Wondering if with her lower weight she could get along and have same range as me with an SL and the smaller battry.
Any info on Dames on SL vs men on full 700a/h mtbs to be shared ?
I got a standard emtb (trek rail 7) and my wife feels a full emtb may be too much of a bike for her at 135 pound (61 kg). She is tall and would need a large. Wondering if with her lower weight she could get along and have same range as me with an SL and the smaller battry.
Any info on Dames on SL vs men on full 700a/h mtbs to be shared ?
Jilleride45
Member
Range is no issue at all on the SL. I had a Levo for 2 years 500wh and my husband had the 700wh levo. On he SL I can do everything the 500wh could do and more. With the range extender it is more like me on the 700wh. But for me to need a range extender you are really talking about more than 50 miles and 4000 feet of climbing. Remember also that the Levo SL has infinite tune so she can set it up however she likes.
I would say the Levo SL is the absolute best all around bike I have had ( have had tons) but if you are only riding the Rail in turbo it will not be a good match. The Levo SL really shines on single track and technical trails.
I am 56 female 115lbs 5’7” on a small Levo SL, about 2000 miles on it. Bought the week they came out. I also have a Creo SL for road.
Jilleride45
Member
Forgot to add that I have a comp carbon with light bicycle carbon wheels setup tubeless and bike weight ready to ride is 36 lbs.
Pan
New Member
Thanks for the info. So I understand that with the SL you essentially do the same range as your hubby on a 700wh levo ?. Would you share his weight ? I do not ride turbo much at all, motsly emtb lite mode, except for rare steep climbs.
another question, was looking at the alu model, would you recommend going to the carbon (cost/benefit wise) ?
Jilleride45
Member
Let me try and clarify. I am 115 lbs, husband 160 lbs. for 2 years I was on a Levo with 500 wh and he had Levo 700 wh. I could always go further than him, my settings were lower and I used lower settings but we always rode nearly identical speed. This year I ordered the SL when it came out and while waiting for it he decided he “needed” one (even though mine was a birthday Valentine’s Day gift, go figure). So now we both just ride SL, but we do all the loops we did before. For me the SL with an extender goes much further than I did before, and my husband says with the extender he goes about 700wh. You may go slower but overall not too different, really depends on how technical the trail is. I was really worried that I would use a lot more energy pedaling the SL but what I find is handling the bike is much easier that I am less tired.
I went carbon just to keep weight as low as possible and keep vibration down, and remember this was a present so heck go carbon. At 135 lbs I would go carbon and carbon wheels.
Pan
New Member
Ok, good, was the power on ? LOL.
