Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
road cc got this from them:The "facts" of this incident are a mix of those by the rider, who evidently spoke very little English, then amplified by the owner of the shop who sold or rented the bike. He was not there when the police tested the bike of course and his priority is to protect his business.
So I am not prepared to accept the story without some statement from the police. Whilst the reported method used is of course flawed it would have only taken a further few mjnutes for the policd to have actually done a short ride to confirm the motor was still providing support beyond 20 kph. Maybe that was done?
Judging from the video posted earlier whilst the rider is obviously not a native English speaker I would certainly not say he spoke "very little English" on the contrary I would say he spoke clearly and well given the obvious stress he must have been under.The "facts" of this incident are a mix of those by the rider, who evidently spoke very little English,
They have this campaign in all cities I expect.I wish they would bring the campaign to London. I ride everyday in London and I am confident that 90 percent of the bikes used by food delivery riders are illegal. Most seem to have throttles since they move without peddling also even the ones that don't greatly exceed the 15 mph speed limit. I ride an electric Brompton and while travelling at the max speed possible they whizz pass doing what seems like 40 mph.
Guessing the bike used "hurty" words?Basically, rider stopped as suspected of riding an illegal (modified) bike. Police tested speed that it can achieve in a very suspect way and deemed the bike to be illegal. Seized & destroyed.
This is not about derestricting but is about how badly understood the 'rules' are about EPAC in the UK, especially by those who enforce it.
BBC article here - Birmingham man's legal e-bike seized and destroyed by police in error
Sorry about that then, saracsm is difficult to get across in print.Yeah ok
All settled here. Pretty full frontal sarcasm.
My bad.
It’s a hilarious story.
Probably needed more of theseSorry about that then, saracsm is difficult to get across in print.![]()
you never know though...Probably needed more of these
Or a bit more of this
![]()
(Henry Nowak) who was arrested and handcuffed on the floor after he was fatally stabbed by his assailant (Vickram Digwa) who was using the racism card.
If the bike wasn't derestricted as we are led to believe, then they can't have seen anything illegal in respect of its speed, which is the justification the Police used initially to seize it as seen in the body worn video. They subsequently claimed the guy had no insurance, that on the face of it seems like the cops doing a bit of retroactive arse covering but we don't know the full facts yet.I wonder what actual riding they witnessed before hand.
The big book of law blocks a lot of sound when held too close in front of your face.A good ending. But the Police should listen more.
Is what Google said what you meant? Just asking.The big book of law blocks a lot of sound when held too close in front of your face.
Google said:A large book acts as a physical barrier that reflects and absorbs sound waves, dampening high frequencies before they reach your ears. By holding it in front of your face, you create an "acoustic shadow" and physically obstruct direct sound paths, similar to the acoustic principles described in ResearchGate The Book of Acoustics.Holding a heavy, dense book close to your face also traps sound directly around your mouth. This alters the acoustics of your own speech—a phenomenon related to the occlusion effect. It makes your voice sound boomier or muffled because the sound waves reflect off the book's hard cover and back into your ears.
Already put my hand up for that one, @galaga187 - I was wrong, the subforum's there, no notes needed on that bit.Surprised by the testing method used by the police and also by some of the comments on this thread. Remember when @Greg Watts was called out for lying/hallucinating about de restrictions threads existing on this forum. Is it ok to ride a derestricted bike as long as “you’re one of the good ones”?
Just picking any old e-bike for no apparent reason, lifting the back end up and spinning the cranks.If the bike wasn't derestricted as we are led to believe, then they can't have seen anything illegal in respect of its speed, which is the justification the Police used initially to seize it as seen in the body worn video. They subsequently claimed the guy had no insurance, that on the face of it seems like the cops doing a bit of retroactive arse covering but we don't know the full facts yet.
I witnessed the police stopping and checking people on Hammersmith Broadway while riding home recently. That’s the first I’ve seen it, they were confiscating a bike while I was at the lightsI wish they would bring the campaign to London. I ride everyday in London and I am confident that 90 percent of the bikes used by food delivery riders are illegal. Most seem to have throttles since they move without peddling also even the ones that don't greatly exceed the 15 mph speed limit. I ride an electric Brompton and while travelling at the max speed possible they whizz pass doing what seems like 40 mph.
People seem to really be upset about e-bikes over there if they're taking such drastic actions as confiscating them! Crazy. Having your several thousand dollar/pound possession destroyed is quite the penalty for such a minor infraction. Feels tyrannical to this American. Hopefully there's a mechanism to have this legislation overturned.I witnessed the police stopping and checking people on Hammersmith Broadway while riding home recently. That’s the first I’ve seen it, they were confiscating a bike while I was at the lights