Haha oh the Seahawk is my inflatable dingy to help me get over the channel to come hit you up on a few trails my friend! Should get my bike over no probs....I see intex boats coming over the channel weekly! I bet they won’t stop me going the other way!
The medium was really tight to get on but felt okay once on, the large still has tightness, in a 39 chest, 6ft, 85kg and it could do with being an inch or two longer tbh....the back is short 1-2 inches off my backside unless I shuffle it down! I’d rather it be your way and maybe longer than too short, it might be perfect for you tbh, check the sizing guide
https://www.scott-sports.com/gb/en/...ir-pro-jacket-protector?article=2784621001009
Ps, the belt is detachable via Velcro strap, it’s an external adjustable band not sure what for but goes on the outside.
The CE2 pads are way better, miles more breathable too! When inserted they feel closer towards the Forcefield level without the bucket effect, perfect!
I noticed CE2 since it’s thicker it’s more rigid, like the CE1 Scott elbow ‘flops’ if I hold it, the CE2 doesn’t and this is exactly why the racer feels nice, but it’s only because the armour is so flimsy! It’s almost like Racer armour is 0.5 CE....but with the CE1 in there it has some of that lovely Racer feel about it, nothing will beat Racer for comfort but it’s only because of the flappy thin armour that isn’t even full since it has cuts in it.
I’d rather have protection trading off the comfort but be comfortable in something breathable, this is where that search ends

.
I like the 7855 but if it’s anything like the Demon it would drive me nuts with the heat/sweaty stuff going on and that lack of a zip hmmmm
CE2 is generally just thicker, not wider or longer, that’s just optional. Here the back is thicker and sizing just longer.
On the pads, it’s interesting as if I measured it wouldn’t be far apart but they wrap around the muscle so much more, I feel protected with them not just supplemental protection as a better than nowt approach
View attachment 42177
View attachment 42178
View attachment 42179