The way the Avinox fanboys are fawning over rumours of changes it would make sense for DJI to have a shortened production cycle. Shorter lifespan than an iPhone and they seem eager to throw down to buy the new new. Gotta have that newest of new to show off at the trailhead.
Perhaps, calling it “fawning” misses the point. Avonix isn’t chasing novelty, they’re compressing the innovation cycle. Faster advancements are how you move the state of the art, and that’s exactly why the legacy brands suddenly look reactive instead of leading. Wanting better tech sooner doesn’t make someone a fanboy. It just means the bar moved, and not everyone kept up.
A member here explains it well in a recent post. “For DJI, I bought their neo drone at launch, one year later they launched the neo 2 with better battery, range, speed, tracking, screens, functionality, image quality etc etc. For effectively the same price... “
Considering that the current motor was a "first attempt" and with over a year of the motors being in the field to add to the knowledge base for the engineering team, I am not surprised to see advancements based on feedback and suggestions.
Full disclosure, for my needs the Bosch motor is my preference, hopefully I will not be lumped into divisive and condescending terms that seem unnecessary to further the discussion.