New CEF69 bafang m510 and bafang m560 and cef50 bafang m820 frames

Charly

Charly

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2024
Messages
166
Reaction score
55
Location
España
IMG_7475.jpeg
 
Last edited:
⚡ EMTB Pro Go Pro — exclusive discounts & ad-free Peaty's 25% off & more · Ad-free browsing · Pro badge See the deals →
CEF50-CEF55 with Bafang M820 battery, 480-835 Wh, and optional 280 Wh extender
CEF69 with Bafang M510 motor, 480-835 Wh battery. option cables by the direction or by the sides.Private information available.When ordering, say Charly for a discount of about 20 USD off the final price.

IMG_7724.jpeg IMG_7722.png IMG_7716.jpeg IMG_7714.jpeg IMG_7756.jpeg IMG_4113.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Does a CEF69-2 have the holes in the side of the head tube for cable routing?
 
Does anyone know the difference between the CEF50, CEF55, and CEF69 frames in terms of their intended use? Which of these is best suited for gravity riding?
 
maurocarpe said:
Does anyone know the difference between the CEF50, CEF55, and CEF69 frames in terms of their intended use? Which of these is best suited for gravity riding?
Click to expand...
CEF50-2 M820 motor with DP C245 display. CEF50-3 M820 motor with DP C030 display. CEF55-2 M820 motor and DP C030 display. CEF69 M510 or M560 motor and DP C030 display.
 
Charlypitillo said:
View attachment 165822 View attachment 165823
Click to expand...
Thank you, but this does not resolve my doubts regarding the field of use of one rather than the other. That is, I would not like to make the choice based on which motor to use, but I would like to make the choice knowing that one is better for descending and the other is better for climbing, both in terms of geometry and the components I could install.
For example, my current choice would be the CEF55, because I can have greater rear travel (up to 180 mm), even though I will then mount it with 160 mm rear travel (which cannot be done with the CEF50).
Based on this, do you think my choice is correct?
 
maurocarpe said:
Thank you, but this does not resolve my doubts regarding the field of use of one rather than the other. That is, I would not like to make the choice based on which motor to use, but I would like to make the choice knowing that one is better for descending and the other is better for climbing, both in terms of geometry and the components I could install.
For example, my current choice would be the CEF55, because I can have greater rear travel (up to 180 mm), even though I will then mount it with 160 mm rear travel (which cannot be done with the CEF50).
Based on this, do you think my choice is correct?
Click to expand...
CEF50 and 55 are more agile for descending due to their weight, and CEF69 is a great climber due to its power.
 
I just wanted to add that Charly reached out to me privately and worked on quoting and pricing the kit that I wanted. It was a very nice experience working with him. Then, I placed the final order with Jean from szzs.
 
Scott, thank you for trusting the SZZSbike brand with the CEF 69. We will soon distribute from Spain. Now it's your turn to assemble it.
 
sk0t said:
I just wanted to add that Charly reached out to me privately and worked on quoting and pricing the kit that I wanted. It was a very nice experience working with him. Then, I placed the final order with Jean from szzs.
Click to expand...
What forks and Shocks you going with? Are you going to do Mullet.
 
nvcheeko said:
What forks and Shocks you going with? Are you going to do Mullet.
Click to expand...
Planning on 29er front and back. Fox 36 performance 160mm up front and might get a 170 air spring for it. Super deluxe 205x60 in the rear.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Keep reading
    Browse all

    Similar Threads

    Community Stats

    Since 2018
    669K
    Messages
    40,821
    Members
    Join 30,000+ Riders, it's free!
    Back
    Top