Thanks for the replies guys. I guess mine is pretty much inline with AlumiPro (assuming he had to trim more inboard as well) - it comes out of the box at setting 7, and I have it trimmed all the way down to 1, so 6 index points instead of 5. 0.2mm sounds like a reasonable tolerance between frames or derailleurs.
Also, I'm currently using the stock 104BCD X-Sync2 chainring, while I'm waiting for the new T-Type 104 BCD ring to show up in the mail - I managed to snag one off an eBay seller in Taiwan. I measured all the dimensions of the new chain, and SRAM isn't lying when they say the T-Type chains aren't compatible with X-Sync2 chainrings - the new rollers are ~0.22mm larger, so the chain doesn't fully seat in the old chainrings (I checked against a brand new X-Sync2 ring). BUT, my current chainring with 1300mi is just worn down enough, so that the new, larger rollers are able to fully seat.
Also, Overkillit, I did consider the same idea, although it would be the opposite - it'd need to go inwards just a tad bit more, so I'd just have to shave the bushing down a tiny bit. I'm going to wait to see what SRAM says.
It's honestly pretty much perfect, but I don't like being on the very end of the adjustment range - it'd be nice if I had at least 1-2 more index points available inward, just so I could fully make sure I have it trimmed to the optimal position.