I don't understand what you're saying ?It seems quite expensive when we look at Trek, Specialized . . .
for a small advantage.
Typo? Should be 25kph (15.5mph)..............the EU imposed max of 20kph to the same as applies in the US and elsewhere.
corrected...ta.Typo? Should be 25kph (15.5mph).
We know the bike as the potential, one question is will your warranty be void?Since there is no difference other than the software between bikes limited to either 25kph or 32kph there should at least be no negative effect on the bike................other than to make it illegal ( in the UK)!!
I got this;We know the bike as the potential, one question is will your warranty be void?
We know the bike as the potential, one question is will your warranty be void?
Hi, i am in Canada where the legal assist top speed is 32km/h.
In europe with a lower legal assist support is the majority
of riders respecting the law?
It seems quite expensive when we look at Trek, Specialized . . .
for a small advantage.
From what I see in the UK derestriction is the norm, lose count of the amount of eebs I see blasting along fireroads, riders still claiming they're getting a workout dressed in long trews jackets and full faces without even getting a sweat on!I think he meant to type "sceptic" !!
I understand some people getting frustrated with the motor cut off speed if they do a lot of flat singletrack, roadwork, commuting, fireroad type riding. Personally I rarely find it an issue riding in the forest. I have no idea what proportion of users hack their motors but I suspect in the UK it is only a minority and most of those would be content with an increase of the EU imposed max of 25kph to the same as applies in the US and elsewhere.
The World's largest electric mountain bike community.