The mechanical Orbea Droppers have been decent enough. They go up and down, they're user serviceable and the parts are all available at a reasonable price (more so than any other dropper I've had except brand X stuff)
No-one makes really bad bikes any more. Avinox got a lot of reviews by giving away a lot of bikes and the high power meant there was an obvious differentiating 'wow' factor.
Unless reviewers are actually buying all the bikes they review at retail (and I dont think theres anyone doing that for bikes - the closest I can think of in the bike industry is DC Rainmaker who returns all the review samples and buys the stuff he likes) they need to keep on the right side of the manufacturers. What that means in reality is accentuating the good stuff about a bike that has some faults and suppressing bad reviews (just not publishing them or not mentioning the issues) rather than saying somethings great when it's not.
None of the review sites or magazines really covered motor reliability - "everyone knew" Specialized had a massively high failure rate on their motors for years but Spec were big enough and important enough that it never really got the coverage it justified?