Yes. Of course I read your post
The fact that you stated you can't understand how sprung pawls are more secure when engaged compared to ratchet rings says to me you probably haven't actually thought very hard about the mechanics of each design and how the engagement is achieved.
It's not all that difficult to grasp if you simply look at the two designs. Allow me to explain.
View attachment 68795
as you can hopefully see with the above sprung pawl designs (not I9 but same principle) the more force you put into driving the hub when the pawls are engaged the more securely they are pressed into the ratchet
whereas...
The Ratchet LN replaces the pawl freehub system. It is the entry level Ratchet System of DT Swiss and it stands for outstanding reliability.
www.dtswiss.com
View attachment 68796 View attachment 68797
with two sprung ratchet rings as the DT Swiss design uses all that is keeping them from slipping (when worn) is the two springs either side.
and the more points of engagement. the finer the ratchet surface required the shallower each tooth. ie. less engagement material in contact. so it stands to reason with wear under high load they will eventually slip.
Nothing is perfect. and yes. As you state with just 2 pawls in contact at any one time in your I9 hub you are asking a lot of the hub shell, freehub body, pawls and ratchet.
And I'm just helping you answer your question within the discussion