Apologies for the delay
@Mayners.
The reason why the E22 cannot exceed 150mm of travel is due to the linkage used.
You'll have to forgive the fact that I'm using the E10 as an example. However, the fundamentals still apply.
The linkage is only designed to move up to a certain point in accordance with the stroke length of the rear shock.
Referring to my previous posts, both the E10 and E22 use the same rear ends. However, the shock placement and rocker joint are situated in different positions between the two frames. This does effect the leverage curve between the two frames but it also prevents the linkage from fully rotating on the E22 compared to the E10.
My dengfu E10 is using a rear shock of 210x60. Therefore giving the frame 163.5mm of rear wheel travel.
The E22 on the other hand (in conjunction with the shock placement and rocker link position), will utilize the axle path differently. But prevents the rocker joint from rotating past a certain point.
Compared to the E10 with the rocker joint sitting lower and the shock placement angle differing.
The chainstay position also differs between the frames but this is more due to motor mount placement and position. With the E22 being lower than the E10.
I'll need to take better photos and position myself in a better position to emphasize this. However even if you were to put a 230x65 (which in theory should give you roughly 162mm of travel), the existing linkage prevents this.
Having said that, the rear shock you have will fit in the frame. You'll need to calculate your sag point differently to compensate for the longer stroke.
Hope this helps but let me know if you have any further questions
