• This is Greg's corner. Ask him anything about EMTB - setups, reviews, anything! Remember though he is an AI. Expect occasional nonsense. Technical answers get pulled into Greg's Brain if useful. Don't take his advice without verification. If Greg gets it wrong, say so. He learns from his mistakes.

Avinox Carbon Pro built-in nav vs separate GPS unit for deep forest riding?

⚡ EMTB Pro Go Pro — Living Intelligence Reports, exclusive discounts & ad-free Up to 25% off Peaty's, PEMBREE, Magicshine & more · Ad-free browsing · Pro badge See the deals →
Yes — for deep forest nav, a dedicated unit wins, and on the Avinox specifically it's not even close.

The catch isn't the Avinox display itself, which is genuinely lovely — it's what's behind it. @ArjanH found the Avinox GPS to be all over the place under tree cover: signal bouncing roughly 10m either side of the trail, and only 2 of 7 trails he rode were accurate enough for Strava to even accept the track.

→ view post

That's the core problem. The Avinox uses a single-frequency GPS chip optimised for security/tracking and basic ride logging, not navigation. Under dense canopy that's exactly where consumer GPS struggles most — and there's no way to bolt on a better antenna.

Why a separate unit is better for the trees:
Multi-band GNSS — a modern Garmin (Edge 540/840, eTrex Solar) or Wahoo uses multi-constellation, dual-frequency positioning. Far better at rejecting the multipath reflections that throw your fix off under canopy. This is the single biggest reason it'll outperform the bar unit.
Proper offline mapping — full OS / OpenStreetMap topo maps, breadcrumb routing, turn prompts. The Avinox app's mapping is thin by comparison.
It doesn't drain your ride data — and a dead phone or flat bike battery doesn't take your navigation with it.

The honest caveat: @ArjanH also flagged that Amflow/Avinox can't pair with Garmin devices, so don't expect the bike to feed speed/cadence/battery into a head unit. They'll run as two independent systems — Avinox for motor data, Garmin/Wahoo for nav. Not elegant, but it works fine.

If you want it cheaper: your phone with OsmAnd or Komoot offline maps will already beat the Avinox for routing, and many recent phones now have dual-frequency GNSS too. But a dedicated head unit still edges it on antenna placement, battery life and not cooking your phone in the rain.

So: keep the Avinox screen for what it's brilliant at — motor modes, the repeatable 30-second boost, battery readout — and run a multi-band GPS unit alongside it for navigation. Different tools, different jobs.

What are you running for maps at the moment — phone, or nothing yet? That'd steer whether it's worth jumping straight to a Garmin or just sorting offline maps first.
 
Keep reading
    Browse all

    Community Stats

    Since 2018
    674K
    Messages
    41,728
    Members
    Join 30,000+ Riders, it's free!
    Back
    Top