Unless someone starts to make something like the VEER Split Belt Pro !
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unless someone starts to make something like the VEER Split Belt Pro !
never saw those in the field. probably a reason for it
Does your bike have a snubber? Is there a spring tensioner employed (usually not for hardtail city bikes)? Fixed tensioner? Are there horizontal dropouts sliding rear axle to place increased tension on the belt?Worst case the belt will skip a cog or come off? Assuming there is a tensioner. The last month I've had 3 cog skips, or at least that's what I think is happening. Something akin to a worn chain jumping a tooth but with a different sound.
VPP and DW4 style designs, you will probably never see a belt drive for this reason, unless they design a very elevated chainstay.An unbroken/continuous rear triangle (parrellagram?) like that couldn't even use a belt. There'd be no way to install it.
Agreed. Maybe this is where something like a VEER Split Belt Pro could come in handy. Basically make a version of with multiple pivots to put in a pack and used temporarily to finish the ride. Either that or assume that Gates belt you stuff in your pack is there to just get you home, and it swap out with a unfettered one.Others have found that belts can experience unseen damage when packaged even a little tightly. Then fail shortly after install. So, if you try and roll the thing up in your hydration pack, thinking that it'll save you down the road/ trail, it likely won't.
If you think about it accessory drive belts on an ICE are packaged in a way that doesn't overly flex them either, probably for the same reason.
or use a chain and just carry a spare multilink and be done with itAgreed. Maybe this is where something like a VEER Split Belt Pro could come in handy. Basically make a version of with multiple pivots to put in a pack and used temporarily to finish the ride. Either that or assume that Gates belt you stuff in your pack is there to just get you home, and it swap out with a unfettered one.
Yep. You can always do the simple, expedient, and reliable thing, that has worked for over a century. Of course, the requisite chain tensioners required look an awful lot like derailleurs; the very aesthetic you not want to not be reminded of with your new ECVT bike.or use a chain and just carry a spare multilink and be done with it
Maybe you missed the already displayed chain mgu Avinox photo one page before this one…Yep. You can always do the simple, expedient, and reliable thing, that has worked for over a century. Of course, the requisite chain tensioners required look an awful lot like derailleurs; the very aesthetic you not want to not be reminded of with your new ECVT bike.
View attachment 188252
But why bother when you can take the plunge and proudly show off your belt drive on your MGU/ECVT bike because no derailleur bike can, creating caste like the Star-Belly Sneeches. Just a glimpse of a belt on your EMTB means you are in an elevated class![]()
I'm well aware and in the end chains will probably be the more prevalent choice for MGU EMTBs. The operative word here is choice, because with derailleur bikes you don't have one. They don't get to put "Stars Upon Thars"Maybe you missed the already displayed chain mgu Avinox photo one page before this one…
are you dumb? both need a tensioner…Yep. You can always do the simple, expedient, and reliable thing, that has worked for over a century. Of course, the requisite chain tensioners required look an awful lot like derailleurs; the very aesthetic you not want to not be reminded of with your new ECVT bike.
View attachment 188252
But why bother when you can take the plunge and proudly show off your belt drive on your MGU/ECVT bike because no derailleur bike can, creating caste like the Star-Belly Sneeches. Just a glimpse of a belt on your EMTB means you are in an elevated class![]()
Specialized do not normally show anything off until it is ready to purchase and with the dealers.Specialized might have something to show off later this month a Whistler Crankworx according to a user on another forum.
Just realised I posted this in the wrong thread!Specialized do not normally show anything off until it is ready to purchase and with the dealers.
I would take this with a big pinch of salt
Full suspension "adventure" type bike with spring tensioner pushing belt up just below the chainring. Same design as Pinion MGU. Initially I had the Bosch dynamic setting set to +5 in turbo (power agressively coming on), and I think the belt cog jump may have been from standstill. I've since reduced the dynamic setting. Maybe the spring is a bit soft.Does your bike have a snubber? Is there a spring tensioner employed (usually not for hardtail city bikes)? Fixed tensioner? Are there horizontal dropouts sliding rear axle to place increased tension on the belt?
But only one of them looks cool as this:are you dumb? both need a tensioner…
True, I'm cherry picking and messing with the troll, but let's see how this prototype actually looks when it gets into production. Belts can get away with one tensioner idler and a snubber, but chains usually require two pulleys to take up enough slack. Looking at that prototype, that pulley doesn't seem to be taking up enough of it, especially with VPP/DW4 ish designs, there is quite a bit of chain growth.Are you just purposely ignoring the great looking one that is already on Proto bike that you said you saw?
View attachment 188395
Not too many of dem two-pulley belt tensioners are there.why would a chain need 2 pulleys on the same bike and onley one when using a belt? did you go to clapping when everyone else went to physics education?
But why bother when you can take the plunge and proudly show off your belt drive on your MGU/ECVT bike because no derailleur bike can, creating caste like the Star-Belly Sneeches. Just a glimpse of a belt on your EMTB means you are in an elevated class![]()
In the classic tale, the Star-Bellied Sneetches brag about being the "best kind of Sneetch on the beaches". They refuse to play with or socialize with the Plain-Belly Sneetches.
Their prejudice is exploited by an entrepreneur named Sylvester McMonkey McBean. He introduces a "Star-On" machine that gives Plain-Bellies stars for $3, which completely disrupts the social hierarchy. To maintain their exclusivity, the original Star-Bellies pay McBean $10 to have their stars removed. This leads to an escalating, absurd cycle of Sneetches constantly running between the machines until they spend all their money. Ultimately, McBean packs up and leaves, and the Sneetches learn that their physical differences never really mattered at all.
Yet them 2-pulley chain tensioners just keep showing up - like a small underdeveloped derailleur.that doesn’t explain the why on the SAME rear design. try again
WARNING: Wearing unbranded non Fox or generic clothing may result in: experiencing genuine thoughts, saving money, forgetting to look wealthy on social media, and an accidental development of actual character. Use at your own risk.I’d never heard the phrase ‘Star-Belly Sneeches’, so did a search.
Might be why you used the phrase in the first place, but there’s a lesson in that tale somewhere for us consumers of electric mountain bikes!![]()
The “War” is already onThis is announcement is quite simply the most import thing to happen to the EMTB space in years. Even more important than DJI's introduction into the EMTB motor space. And it has everything to do with the specific transmission tech they seem to have gone with: ECVT. And in one fell swoop energized the the flagging MGU space that has seem to go nowhere for the last 5 years.
I've been expounding on the benefits of ECVT over traditional gearbox designs stuffed with carriages of spur gears for each gear step for over a year now on this thread. I was practically begging on the thread for some large player to take on this design because ECVT is essentially the best way to rescue MGUs as they are currently and conventionally thought about: as being heavy, ungainly, lossy, clunky, kludgy, loud, and overly complex. Just look at the motor in Robs hands: if you weren't looking carefully, you'd mistake it for M2 motor! The only way it could be this compact is to ditch the gearbox altogether. Only ECVT could do this (perhaps pedal-by-wire as well like with the Niche motor).
Going over all the potential players (Bosch, Shimano, SRAM/Brose/Specialized), I saw DJI as the only one with enough balls put their cards on the table, not only only in the MGU space, but critically to go with ECVT. I would be singing a completely different tune if they warmed-over a Pinion or Interdrive design. MGU patents from SRAM and Shimano look to renditions of these traditional gearbox designs. And Bosch? I just never got whey they sat on their asses not getting to the MGU space - after all they, have no derailleur transmission legacy to protect like SRAM and Shimano. If anything, all these big players should be happy they got a warning shot from Avinox before the MGU wars start. They've got at best on more year to get their assess in gear or the game is over before it started.
i‘d say most probably because of different designs in mounting the motors to the frame and not having something to bolt a tensioner to as shown with the forbidden or the megamo prototype? now take forbidden‘s design of a high pivot with chain, i would bet that thing has less total resistance in the chain than my current velduro with a derailleur.Yet them 2-pulley chain tensioners just keep showing up - like a small underdeveloped derailleur.
View attachment 188400
Well, they advertised the S-Works Levo 4, frame set only, and it's never been available in S6 in the UK. I'm now glad it wasn't, as i'm picking my Atherton up in August.Specialized do not normally show anything off until it is ready to purchase and with the dealers.
I would take this with a big pinch of salt