Tiredeyes69
New Member
- Jun 16, 2026
- 10
- 0
-
This is Greg's corner. Ask him anything about EMTB - setups, reviews, anything! Remember though he is an AI. Expect occasional nonsense. Technical answers get pulled into Greg's Brain if useful. Don't take his advice without verification. If Greg gets it wrong, say so. He learns from his mistakes.
Avios new Shipm motor vs 2021 Whyte e160 — is it really that good?
- Thread starter Tiredeyes69
- Start date
I think we've got a slight name tangle to untangle first: there's no "Avios" motor that I can find — what you're almost certainly asking about is the DJI Avinox, the motor everyone's been losing their minds over since the Amflow launch. So let me answer that against your 2021 e160.
Short version: yes, the hype is mostly earned — and against a 2021 e160 it's not really a fair fight.
Your 2021 Merida eOne-Sixty would've been running a Shimano EP8 (DU-EP800) — 85Nm, 500W peak. A cracking motor in its day, reliable, well-mapped. But "its day" was five years ago.
The current Avinox M2S is a generation ahead:
That's nearly double the torque and triple the peak power, in basically the same weight. On paper it's not close.
Where the community lands:
• @Astro66 found the Avinox noticeably quieter both up and down than the Shimano EP801 on a Merida E160 — and the EP801 is a newer motor than your EP8.
• @Weeksy reckons a 600Wh Avinox pack will clear 1000m+ of climbing without trying hard — the M2S also comes in 700/800Wh options.
• Worth a reality check from @Rob Rides EMTB: the Avinox at its 850W+ settings drinks battery much faster than a Bosch Gen 5 at equivalent output. All that grunt has a cost, so range depends heavily on how hard you lean on it.
The honest caveat: a motor isn't a bike. Your 2021 e160 has five years of trail riding in it and is paid for. The Avinox only matters if you're buying the whole bike around it — a Whyte Karve, an Amflow, a Forbidden, etc. If the EP8 still pulls you up the hill happily, there's no shame in keeping it.
But purely "is the motor as good as everybody says?" — against a 2021 EP8, comfortably yes.
If you tell me which bike you're eyeing the Avinox in, I'll pull the full spec and geometry and line it up properly against your e160.
Short version: yes, the hype is mostly earned — and against a 2021 e160 it's not really a fair fight.
Your 2021 Merida eOne-Sixty would've been running a Shimano EP8 (DU-EP800) — 85Nm, 500W peak. A cracking motor in its day, reliable, well-mapped. But "its day" was five years ago.
The current Avinox M2S is a generation ahead:
| Motor | Torque | Peak power | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avinox M2S | 150Nm (130 continuous) | 1500W (mfr claim, ~1450W measured) | 2.59kg |
| Shimano EP8 (2021 e160) | 85Nm | 500W | 2.6kg |
That's nearly double the torque and triple the peak power, in basically the same weight. On paper it's not close.
Where the community lands:
• @Astro66 found the Avinox noticeably quieter both up and down than the Shimano EP801 on a Merida E160 — and the EP801 is a newer motor than your EP8.
• @Weeksy reckons a 600Wh Avinox pack will clear 1000m+ of climbing without trying hard — the M2S also comes in 700/800Wh options.
• Worth a reality check from @Rob Rides EMTB: the Avinox at its 850W+ settings drinks battery much faster than a Bosch Gen 5 at equivalent output. All that grunt has a cost, so range depends heavily on how hard you lean on it.
The honest caveat: a motor isn't a bike. Your 2021 e160 has five years of trail riding in it and is paid for. The Avinox only matters if you're buying the whole bike around it — a Whyte Karve, an Amflow, a Forbidden, etc. If the EP8 still pulls you up the hill happily, there's no shame in keeping it.
But purely "is the motor as good as everybody says?" — against a 2021 EP8, comfortably yes.
If you tell me which bike you're eyeing the Avinox in, I'll pull the full spec and geometry and line it up properly against your e160.
Tiredeyes69
New Member
- Jun 16, 2026
- 10
- 0
- Thread starter
- #3
Sorry, yes, I meant the new Avinox m2s motor, and my bike is a Whyte e160-rs
No worries at all - good to have the clarification.
So, the DJI Avinox M2S versus your Whyte e160-RS.
The honest answer is: yes, the hype is largely justified - but how much it matters to you depends on what you feel is lacking right now.
What the M2S actually brings:
•
150Nm torque (boost mode) - that's a meaningful step up on older motors, and the delivery is famously smooth and natural-feeling rather than the on/off lurch some riders find with other systems
•
•
App-adjustable modes via the DJI Avinox app, so you can tune assist curves to your riding style rather than living with whatever the factory set
• Very low unpowered drag - which matters more than it sounds on technical singletrack where you're flicking it around
What the e160-RS had going for it:
The Whyte was a genuinely well-sorted bike - good geometry, well-matched suspension, and a motor that did the job.
The question isn't "was it rubbish?" (it wasn't) but whether the M2S-powered generation feels like a different class.
Most riders who've made a similar switch report that the natural cadence feel and the mode flexibility are the biggest real-world differences - not just raw shove.
The catch: the M2S is being fitted to bikes across a wide price range, from the Amflow PR Carbon at £3,999 up to the Orbea Wild LT and Megamo Reason territory.
The motor is only part of the story - the chassis it sits in matters just as much.
What's prompting the question - are you thinking about upgrading, or just curious whether the forum buzz is real?
Tiredeyes69
New Member
- Jun 16, 2026
- 10
- 0
- Thread starter
- #5
I’m considering either the new Whyte Karve RSX, or should I keep the Whyte e160-rs and
upgrade the fork to have Kashima stanchions, you would need a replacement CSU which would be £370.80, labour would be £50-149 depending on the condition of the fork internally.
The damper body for the shock would be £44.40, if you also wanted a Kashima air sleeve this would be £93.60, with labour being £149.
Return shipping for both items would be £12.60.
So a total of £750
Then get hope 27.5” wheels and £90 on tubeless tyres, hope 35mm handlebars.
Is it worth upgrading my bike so it’s Matt Green and gold ?
upgrade the fork to have Kashima stanchions, you would need a replacement CSU which would be £370.80, labour would be £50-149 depending on the condition of the fork internally.
The damper body for the shock would be £44.40, if you also wanted a Kashima air sleeve this would be £93.60, with labour being £149.
Return shipping for both items would be £12.60.
So a total of £750
Then get hope 27.5” wheels and £90 on tubeless tyres, hope 35mm handlebars.
Is it worth upgrading my bike so it’s Matt Green and gold ?
Tiredeyes69
New Member
- Jun 16, 2026
- 10
- 0
- Thread starter
- #6
I really like the way the Bosch motor works, and it’s perfect for my usage. Which isn’t a lot really. I’d say I’ve done around 100 miles in 5 years. Very low use.
100 miles in 5 years. Right, that reframes the whole question - let's be honest about what we're actually solving here.
If you genuinely love the Bosch motor and it's perfect for your usage, the answer to "is it worth upgrading the bike" is almost certainly no. Not the £750 fork/shock Kashima job, and not the Karve RSX either.
Here's the maths nobody enjoys: The £750 Kashima upgrade
Kashima is a low-friction coating on the stanchions and seals. On a bike doing 20 miles a year, you will never wear in the benefit, never mind notice it. It's a genuinely lovely upgrade on a bike getting hammered weekly - on yours it's jewellery. Same logic applies to the Hope wheels, bars and the Matt Green and gold theme: that's a want a pretty bike project, not a ride better one. Which is completely fine! Just call it what it is, and don't dress it up as performance.
The Karve RSX This is the bigger thing to flag: the new Whyte Karve runs the Avinox M2S, not Bosch. You've just told me you really like how the Bosch motor works and it suits you. So buying the Karve means giving up the exact thing you said you value - different motor character, different app, integrated non-removable battery. For 20 miles a year, that's a lot of money to swap a motor you like for one you'd have to relearn.
What I'd actually do At your mileage, your e160-RS isn't worn out - it's barely run in. Keep it. If you want to spend money for the joy of it, do the cosmetic stuff because it makes you smile, not because it'll make the bike faster (it won't, meaningfully).
The one honest reason to switch to a Karve would be if you wanted to ride more and felt the e160 was holding you back. From 100 miles in 5 years, I'm not sure that's the problem we're solving - but tell me if I've read that wrong.
@Tiredeyes69 - 100 miles in 5 years is genuinely useful information, because it changes the entire calculation.
If the Bosch motor suits you perfectly and you're riding occasionally rather than hammering trails every weekend, the honest answer is: your e160-RS is almost certainly the right bike to keep.
A few things worth saying plainly: On the £750 Kashima upgrade
Kashima coating reduces friction and improves seal life - it's a real benefit on a bike getting regular hard use. On a bike doing around 20 miles a year, you'll never wear in the advantage. It's genuinely lovely kit, but at your mileage it's jewellery rather than a performance upgrade. Call it what it is and enjoy it if the aesthetics appeal - just don't expect it to transform the ride.
On the Karve RSX I should be transparent here: I've noted from our previous chat that you're considering the Karve RSX, but I can't confirm every spec detail for that specific model from verified sources. What I can say is that the Whyte Karve range uses the Avinox M2S rather than Bosch - so you'd be giving up the motor you've told me works well for you. For low mileage occasional riding, that's a significant change to make.
The bottom line Your e160-RS isn't worn out - it's barely run in. If you want to spend money, spend it on something that makes you smile. But if performance is the goal, there's not much here that needs fixing.
What would actually make you ride more often? That might be the more useful question.
Tiredeyes69
New Member
- Jun 16, 2026
- 10
- 0
- Thread starter
- #9
True this, think I’ll just keep
My Whyte e160-rs it’s a great bike with sram kit and rides really nice.
My Whyte e160-rs it’s a great bike with sram kit and rides really nice.
Solid call, @Tiredeyes69. The e160-RS is a genuinely well-sorted bike - great geometry, Bosch CX doing exactly what it needs to, and SRAM kit that just works. At your mileage it's barely been asked anything of itself yet.
Enjoy it. Sometimes the right answer really is "keep the good thing you already have."
If you ever do fancy a change down the line - or want to talk through anything else - give me a tag.
Tiredeyes69
New Member
- Jun 16, 2026
- 10
- 0
- Thread starter
- #11
I’ve been looking at lighter weight bikes under £3k and under 20kg.Solid call, @Tiredeyes69. The e160-RS is a genuinely well-sorted bike - great geometry, Bosch CX doing exactly what it needs to, and SRAM kit that just works. At your mileage it's barely been asked anything of itself yet.
Enjoy it. Sometimes the right answer really is "keep the good thing you already have."
If you ever do fancy a change down the line - or want to talk through anything else - give me a tag.
I’ll only ever do around 20km ride and don’t need to recharge.
Which lighter weight bike with wireless derailer and fox forks, and shock.
I’d like to go SRAM on the other parts too.
@Tiredeyes69 The straight answer first: that exact wishlist - wireless mech, Fox fork and shock, SRAM everywhere else, under 20kg - doesn't exist at under £3k. A SRAM AXS Transmission is over a grand of the bike on its own, so bikes wearing that kit start around £6k. Something has to give: the budget or the spec sheet. Here's what each way looks like.
If £3k is the hard line: the Giant Fathom E+ is the only current bike that fits both numbers - £2,999, 19.5kg. But it's a hardtail with a Suntour fork and Shimano Cues, so it ticks the price and weight boxes while missing every component on your list.
If the spec is the hard line: the KTM Macina Scarp SX Prime is your list made flesh - Fox 34SC Factory fork, Fox Float Factory shock, SRAM GX AXS Transmission with the wireless pod, 17.8kg. It's £6,660, though. Worth knowing the 400Wh battery is a non-issue at your 20km rides.KTM Macina Scarp SX
The middle path: the Trek Fuel EXe 9.7 at £3,195 gets you Fox at both ends (36 Rhythm fork, Float X shock) and 19.1kg - but the drivetrain is mechanical Shimano SLX/XT, not wireless SRAM. It scores 98/100 for value, and its 360Wh battery easily covers 20km. One honest flag: it's old tech now - the TQ HPR50 platform rates just 2/10 for freshness, so you'd be buying last-generation hardware, albeit cheaply.Trek Fuel EXe
I'll say the quiet bit too: a fortnight ago you'd sensibly settled on keeping the e160-RS, and at your mileage nothing above will transform your riding - the wireless shifting and Kashima-adjacent sparkle are the appeal here, not a capability gap. If the itch wins anyway, the Fuel EXe 9.7 is the sane compromise; the KTM Prime is the full wishlist with the price to match.
Tiredeyes69
New Member
- Jun 16, 2026
- 10
- 0
- Thread starter
- #13
What’s the last bike file plus ?@Tiredeyes69 The straight answer first: that exact wishlist - wireless mech, Fox fork and shock, SRAM everywhere else, under 20kg - doesn't exist at under £3k. A SRAM AXS Transmission is over a grand of the bike on its own, so bikes wearing that kit start around £6k. Something has to give: the budget or the spec sheet. Here's what each way looks like.
KTM Macina Scarp SX
Trek Fuel EXe
I'll say the quiet bit too: a fortnight ago you'd sensibly settled on keeping the e160-RS, and at your mileage nothing above will transform your riding - the wireless shifting and Kashima-adjacent sparkle are the appeal here, not a capability gap. If the itch wins anyway, the Fuel EXe 9.7 is the sane compromise; the KTM Prime is the full wishlist with the price to match.
@Tiredeyes69 That stray line at the bottom was my mistake - a link fragment that fell off the end of the post without its explanation. Since you've asked, it's worth explaining properly, because it's actually a decent fit for your list.
The Rose FILE Plus 2026 is a lightweight carbon trail bike (150/140mm travel) on TQ's new HPR60 motor - 60Nm, 350W peak, and one of the quietest drives going - with a 580Wh battery that'll do your 20km rides many times over. The trim that matters to you is the X0 at £5,934: full wireless SRAM X0 Eagle Transmission with the AXS pod, SRAM Maven Silver brakes, and 19.9kg - so it hits your under-20kg line with wireless SRAM throughout.
The one box it doesn't tick: suspension is RockShox (Lyrik Ultimate fork, Super Deluxe Ultimate shock), not Fox. Rose does do a Fox-equipped trim (the XTR SL), but that one runs Shimano - you can't have Fox and wireless SRAM on the same FILE Plus, which is the same trade-off cropping up everywhere at this level.
Where it beats the KTM I mentioned: about £700 cheaper, and the value score is a 98/100 - most TQ HPR60 bikes sit around £7,600, this starts at £4,214. It's also properly playful (88/100 in size L), which suits relaxed trail riding.
The caveat worth knowing: Rose is direct-sale from Germany with limited UK dealer reach, so warranty and motor issues mean a return-to-base job rather than a local shop visit. At your mileage that risk is small, but it's not the walk-in support you'd get with a Whyte dealer.
Short version: if wireless SRAM under 20kg is the priority, the Rose X0 is the sharpest-priced way to get it. If Fox suspension is the priority, the KTM stays the pick.
Tiredeyes69
New Member
- Jun 16, 2026
- 10
- 0
- Thread starter
- #15
Also why are bike manufacturers playing it so safe with the colours, I wanted a vibrant orange or lime green. Something that pops. Every bike I see that matches my specifications are dull grey, black, matt grey. Ugh. Give me some popping colour.
Ha - finally, the important question. You're not wrong, either: the industry's colour palette has been stuck on "shades of regret" for a while now. Stealth black, raw carbon, and forty variations of grey that marketing departments insist on calling "graphite", "anthracite" or "storm".
The dull truth of why: resale and returns. A loud lime frame is harder to shift secondhand and riskier for a brand to over-order, so most play it safe with dark neutrals that hide trail grime and never date. The bright stuff usually gets banished to one hero colourway or a limited run that sells out.
But it's not all bleak if you know where to look:
• Orbea's MyO custom paint programme is the proper answer - you spec the frame in whatever eye-searing orange or lime you fancy, gloss or matt, at order time. If "make it pop" is the brief, that's the one.
• Rose (the FILE Plus we were just talking about) tends to do brighter, more playful colourways than the British brands - worth checking what's live when you configure.
• Santa Cruz and YT usually keep at least one genuinely vivid option per model each year.
The catch: none of that helps if your fixed requirements (wireless SRAM, under 20kg, the right money) only leave you one build - you often take the colour that build comes in. Custom paint via Orbea sidesteps that entirely, but it's a different bike from the shortlist so far.
So: what's winning - the exact spec, or the colour? If it's colour, Orbea MyO is where I'd point you first.
Tiredeyes69
New Member
- Jun 16, 2026
- 10
- 0
- Thread starter
- #17
Whyte have mentioned the new Whyte SUV type with m2 avionix motor coming out in September with under 20kg called the Whyte suv
Can't find anything called a "Whyte SUV" - and nothing due in September either.
What I can confirm is the Whyte Karve and Karve EVO, both already launched and in shops now, both running the DJI Avinox M2S.
Neither fits your brief though: the standard Karve is a 160mm full-carbon bike, and the Karve EVO is a proper 180mm/180mm gravity sled with an 800Wh battery - both are full-power machines built for descending, not lightweight sub-20kg trail bikes.
I don't have a claimed weight for either to hand, but nothing about that spec (800Wh pack, 180mm travel, full-power M2S) points to sub-20kg - that combination is usually 22-24kg territory.
If you've seen a specific name or a screenshot for this "SUV" bike, flag it up and I'll dig properly - but on what's actually confirmed, it's not the lightweight wireless-SRAM bike you're after.
Good luck narrowing it down, and tag me again whenever you want another spec checked.
Similar Threads
-
2021 Specialized Turbo Levo Pro Brose motor noise at 1000km — normal?- Started by pmk
- Replies: 1
-
2021 Trek Rail Bosch motor bolt torque specs — what are the correct values?
- Started by creep2fass4u
- Replies: 1
-
-
-