Who actually wants more than 85nm and 400%

Who actually wants more than 85nm and 400%

  • I do! Give me all the power I can get! I want MORE!!

    Votes: 75 27.7%
  • Not really, but ill take it if its on offer.

    Votes: 128 47.2%
  • Not me, not interested.

    Votes: 68 25.1%

  • Total voters
    271
Well, thats why I voted -

Not really, but ill take it if its on offer.​

Its a pretty pointless argument, as you can't really buy an 85nm motor bike brand new anymore lol
Heh kind of true. All these motors weigh roughly similar, and seem capable of 85ish torque to 150ish just based on software tuning. I wonder if they could even be made much lighter if they actually topped out at 85nm. There'd probably be a market for that, if they could make a bike with 60% the torque/power and 60% the weight.
 
⚡ EMTB Pro Go Pro — Living Intelligence Reports, exclusive discounts & ad-free Up to 25% off Peaty's, PEMBREE, Magicshine & more · Ad-free browsing · Pro badge See the deals →
Heh kind of true. All these motors weigh roughly similar, and seem capable of 85ish torque to 150ish just based on software tuning. I wonder if they could even be made much lighter if they actually topped out at 85nm. There'd probably be a market for that, if they could make a bike with 60% the torque/power and 60% the weight.
To me weight is more important than power.
 
Screenshot_20260609-162920.webp
 
Too much power for a below average MTB rider, shocking.

I posted that as a bit of a joke. 😁

When you actually watch the video what he's getting at is if you use all the bike's power you don't get to go very far, so it needs to be curtailed if you want to ride for more than an hour. Him and his mate wanted to do a three hour ride so the big power modes were a no go.
 
Plummet's kid has an Avinox so he has ridden them and thinks highly of the motor system as we've discussed it by PM.
I definitely get the argument that it's better to have the power, if there's no downside, then to not have it.
However, there are a couple of downsides. Battery usage, drivetrain wear & legality being the big ones.
If I was purchasing a new Wild right now, I'd probably buy the Avinox version. But nothing to do with the power.
 
Last edited:
I have dialled my Auto mode right back so that it is merely helping out like a stronger version of Eco. I'm assuming on an Avinox screen that the thin sweeping bar is my input and the thicker one underneath is the bike's output/assistance level? My two bars go up and down in unison in both Eco and Auto now. Auto used to instantly max out its bar and make me feel puny when I saw mine not keeping up!

Trail (steep) and Turbo (steeper) are my two nutter modes reserved for blasting uphill. I've also dialled Trail back so it feels different from Turbo. I found that most of the Avinox modes were set to show off the motor's power straight out of the box and all felt rather similar, bar Eco.

On most of my ride yesterday I had a killer headwind and (my) Auto mode was all I needed just to help it not feel like a horrible slog.

What I'll probably do at some point is create a custom mode and copy my new Auto settings into it, then reset the Auto back to factory. Now I have tweaked it over the last few rides and perfected it for my riding it's not really a true Auto mode anymore, more Eco+...
 
I have dialled my Auto mode right back so that it is merely helping out like a stronger version of Eco. I'm assuming on an Avinox screen that the thin sweeping bar is my input and the thicker one underneath is the bike's output/assistance level? My two bars go up and down in unison in both Eco and Auto now. Auto used to instantly max out its bar and make me feel puny when I saw mine not keeping up!

Trail (steep) and Turbo (steeper) are my two nutter modes reserved for blasting uphill. I've also dialled Trail back so it feels different from Turbo. I found that most of the Avinox modes were set to show off the motor's power straight out of the box and all felt rather similar, bar Eco.

On most of my ride yesterday I had a killer headwind and (my) Auto mode was all I needed just to help it not feel like a horrible slog.

What I'll probably do at some point is create a custom mode and copy my new Auto settings into it, then reset the Auto back to factory. Now I have tweaked it over the last few rides and perfected it for my riding it's not really a true Auto mode anymore, more Eco+...
You can create a page that shows how many watts you push, how many the motor in outputting and your cadence plus the gear your are and the %of battery. I find it quite useful to see how much you are consuming in the various modes. The page that I use is the small top and bottom rectangles and 3 main rectangles. It is so cool that you can create your own pages, what is a bit counter intuitive that not all type of layout offer the same metrics so you need to play around a bit.

I agree Auto, Trail and Turbo in default do not show much difference.
I have detuned Auto to 4-9 assistance, 95nm and 750w (kind of my old bike mode), Trail just detuned the assistance 7-11, Turbo is at default and created a OverT that is Turbo with max out assistance and the longest overrun. In this way I can control how much overrun I want by switching between the two "Turbos".
Some people like to use Auto and Trail and max them out so you never change mode as it adaptive, you will not end up burning much more. But I like to be the one deciding how much power I have depending on the situation as it may be flat but with big obstacle so I want Turbo with Overrun, then quite steep but super easy I don't need all the power and I'm happy to put more effort in it.

Auto and Trail have assistance range and the logic to vary the assistance by using the sensors (you can clearly see in Trail on flat vs on steep) but afaik you cannot copy Auto or Trail and on custom modes you cannot set the assistance range.
So you cannot have two Autos or Trails with different settings. I need to verify this but I'm quite positive.
 
You can create a page that shows how many watts you push, how many the motor in outputting and your cadence plus the gear your are and the %of battery. I find it quite useful to see how much you are consuming in the various modes. The page that I use is the small top and bottom rectangles and 3 main rectangles. It is so cool that you can create your own pages, what is a bit counter intuitive that not all type of layout offer the same metrics so you need to play around a bit.

I agree Auto, Trail and Turbo in default do not show much difference.
I have detuned Auto to 4-9 assistance, 95nm and 750w (kind of my old bike mode), Trail just detuned the assistance 7-11, Turbo is at default and created a OverT that is Turbo with max out assistance and the longest overrun. In this way I can control how much overrun I want by switching between the two "Turbos".
Some people like to use Auto and Trail and max them out so you never change mode as it adaptive, you will not end up burning much more. But I like to be the one deciding how much power I have depending on the situation as it may be flat but with big obstacle so I want Turbo with Overrun, then quite steep but super easy I don't need all the power and I'm happy to put more effort in it.

Auto and Trail have assistance range and the logic to vary the assistance by using the sensors (you can clearly see in Trail on flat vs on steep) but afaik you cannot copy Auto or Trail and on custom modes you cannot set the assistance range.
So you cannot have two Autos or Trails with different settings. I need to verify this but I'm quite positive.

Very helpful. Thanks 👍🏻
 
I just rode my Gen 5 Bosch with the 120 NM update. I've been off the bike for 2 months due to a damaged knee and am now 8 days out of knee surgery so have not messed with the bike much at all and definitely not with the update.
Anyways, it's so very powerful. It will effortlessly go up steep inclines in like 5th gear.
And what's crazy to me is that it's basically weak compared to the M2s.
I understand that we all live in different places and the world is much larger than a little canyon trail behind my home. But gosh dang that's a lot of power to be called a 'bike'.
I might swap my entire drivetrain over to the SRAM DH Transmission. The issue is that if I needed a slower battery conserving ride, I would not have the gears to do so.
 
I am not an fan of this DJI/Avinox hype...I see some guys here they are way out of shape, no helmet nothing, but for them it's about power and nothing else, experience on the trails zero! I just wait for it that one of these subjects crashes into some other biker...damn!!!
Instead I do think that Mahle offers a real alternative with the M40, I test one Bike with it and it is brilliant how natural the power delivery is.
Just waiting for some nice Bikes with this Motor. The best part...it's from Europe ☺️
 
I am not an fan of this DJI/Avinox hype...I see some guys here they are way out of shape, no helmet nothing, but for them it's about power and nothing else, experience on the trails zero! I just wait for it that one of these subjects crashes into some other biker...damn!!!
Instead I do think that Mahle offers a real alternative with the M40, I test one Bike with it and it is brilliant how natural the power delivery is.
Just waiting for some nice Bikes with this Motor. The best part...it's from Europe ☺️
The bike industry is all about making you want to buy a new bike every few years by incrementally changing things.

Years ago mountain bikes had front derailleurs. Then 1x10 came about. Then 1x11. Then 1x12. 26” wheels, then 29” wheels. Then 27.5” wheels. Now 32” wheels. Wider tires. More slack. More slack. More slack. More slack.

My point is the industry loves having “the next big thing” to sell their bikes. Avinox started the hype train with big torque numbers. Then bigger torque numbers. The M3 will have 175nm and the M4 will have 200nm.
They’ll keep it going because it sells bikes.

Quite honestly, I think you’re right tho… traveling uphill at 1500w max output is only marginally faster than traveling uphill at 1000w. But it’ll sell new bikes.
 
I am not an fan of this DJI/Avinox hype...I see some guys here they are way out of shape

There are a lot of IAFH members (International Avinox Forum Hammers) now who see every post that isn’t super positive about Avinox or de-restriction as a nail to be hit.

De-restriction has crept out of the de-restriction section now as well, three posts just this morning mentioning they’ve geo-unlocked their bike, praising the ease with which assist speed can be raised and the other actually saying how you do it.

Even the people who get very exercised and insulting about not mentioning it outside of the de-restriction section aren’t kicking off, probably because it’s an ‘IAFH’ member…

The Avinox is a great motor system for sure, I’ve never said otherwise, and it’s brought about change in the EMTB industry, and forums for that matter.

Some of it good, some not so much.
 
disclaimer :
i'm not the show runer from this channel.
I don't think power race is ok (i think M1 is ok, now we need mass / size reduction)
BUT
in this video, the show runer made a point that deserve some attention.

some though about power increase

I don't say it's true, ok and i only partially approve.

But in the end, with enough power, the torque delivery could vary with various factor (gradient, speed, weight of the bike + rider, etc ..) while derailleur could partially or totally disappear.

In conclusion, limiting the power / torque transmitted to the ground could be the good rule (to avoid killing innovation), the speed limit for assistance delivery being the 'golden rule'.
 
I have a Bosch CX-R with a 600wh battery. This is a known efficient motor system. But gosh darn it sucks the battery quick.
On a mini trail I built, it's in the range of 8%/mile NOT on turbo mode.
Real world range really has to be something given consideration.
 
Yesterday, while watching XC Short Track, and seeing top attlets suffering on those climbs and in particular on the rock garden, i started thinking about The emtb thing, and Power questions.

Those guys, trainned attlets, pushing their heart out, were crawling that climb.
And here it heat me: Why on Earth would mtb be easy?

Also today, rode the ebike with the least power since I bought
200W and 30Nm.
For 25 (hard) kms, I was enjoying myself.
Yes it was slow, yes it was difficult and it hurt a little (not so much as doing it on a MTB).
When I switched to eMTB+ (600W/85Nm), I was like: what the hell???
Yes in this mode, I could climb faster, difficult technical climbs and have fun. But.... wasn't natural.

Ebikes are more close to bikes than motorcycles.
And having so much torque and power, the EMTB experience becomes... unatural, and it's Cycling nor Moto!

The conclusion I've reached:

MTB / eMTB is not easy. Anything to put hard trails easy, is simply and plain stupid. It's supose to be hard.
Applying more power (which ever will be the limit), so that someone with no fitness or with health condition, can enjoy it, is not the solution.
Those that cannot do with a mere 600W/85Nm, should use easier trails.
Not the way around - More Power so that Trails become easier.


I know this position won't have likes and should end with a lot of rant, but thruth is:

Watch XC at the highest level. You should be able to climb all those climbs with a "mere" 600W/85Nm (And these values are really friendly! I can climb most dual track/width tracks with 1 leg! Even those ar +20%).

EMTb should not exceed what those Professional riders do.

Moto ain't eMTB and vice versa.
For ALL that never rode Moto and confuse eMTB with Moto, just watch the video....
NO eMTB will ever do that, unless it has so much power/weight ratio as that moto (+50hp, 200kg rider+moto)

Screenshot_20260613_110424_Flow.webp


The video (the forum wasn't accepting the file):


This is MOTO, and no time soon will I see an eMTB climbing that, unless some puts cranks and pedals on a Stark, and calls it an eBIKE
 
Last edited:
I never lacked fitness until I got to 63. Then it didn't matter what I did, I could no longer keep up with my younger riding buddies. I was holding them up on long climbs. They were patient and ever so NICE about it, but I decided that I was holding them back. I was retired and could ride any day of the week, why ruin their one big ride of the week. So I started riding on my own, so as not to hold them up, but I continued to deteriorate. Eventually, I bought an emtb and suddenly instead of 10 miles followed by 3 days recovery, I could ride anywhere I liked, and the same the next day! :love: I felt reborn! I cannot describe to you how much delight I got from this.

There is no way that I have recovered the fitness I used to have. I'm 75 now (all but a few weeks) and seven years later I'm still doing 20 mile emtb rides whenever I want. (Well maybe I need one day off between rides). I'm only doing one ride a week at the moment, but I've been ill for a couple of months, but recovering steadily.

@Mario Antony, it is not all about fitness, it's also about the taking part and the enjoyment, Let's not forget the enjoyment! :ROFLMAO:
 
Xc isn’t emtb man. We already all took the plunge into the unnatural. Spin it however you want, you do you and let me do me.
I'm not comparing XC with eMTB

What I mean is, if you need MORE power (motor+rider) than a Top Attlet (full gas! All above 1000W for a period) then, you should really check a more powerfull machine without pedals.
 
I never lacked fitness until I got to 63. Then it didn't matter what I did, I could no longer keep up with my younger riding buddies. I was holding them up on long climbs. They were patient and ever so NICE about it, but I decided that I was holding them back. I was retired and could ride any day of the week, why ruin their one big ride of the week. So I started riding on my own, so as not to hold them up, but I continued to deteriorate. Eventually, I bought an emtb and suddenly instead of 10 miles followed by 3 days recovery, I could ride anywhere I liked, and the same the next day! :love: I felt reborn! I cannot describe to you how much delight I got from this.

There is no way that I have recovered the fitness I used to have. I'm 75 now (all but a few weeks) and seven years later I'm still doing 20 mile emtb rides whenever I want. (Well maybe I need one day off between rides). I'm only doing one ride a week at the moment, but I've been ill for a couple of months, but recovering steadily.

@Mario Antony, it is not all about fitness, it's also about the taking part and the enjoyment, Let's not forget the enjoyment! :ROFLMAO:

I Understand the Enjoyment thing.
But let's put this way:

If you go on a ride, a technincal one (meaning red, black and double black), will you enjoy if you aren't capable?
Is the problem the trails?

The same with ALL rides.
Everyone must enjoy themselfs, but in a reasonable and sincerelly rides must be adapt, so that all can make it.

Meaning:
The level field, should be what the least capable rider can do... NOT the: let's pump MO'POWA because grandpa want's to join us!
 
A few weeks ago a took a plunge and bought a TQ powered Fuel EXe 9.8 AXS, it was incredibly cheap and full carbon including carbon rims, so there was nothing to lose.
After a few rides, I love it, yes it is hard to climb with it but I managed everything what I managed with my Bosch Wild, just slower. It is so much fun and also you feel your body again, you are a part of the ride and it made me so satisfied.
It's such a fun bike to ride and natural riding experience. I really do enjoy it now and trying to use it for maximum range....it's also quite efficient with a small 360wh battery.
 
A few weeks ago a took a plunge and bought a TQ powered Fuel EXe 9.8 AXS, it was incredibly cheap and full carbon including carbon rims, so there was nothing to lose.
After a few rides, I love it, yes it is hard to climb with it but I managed everything what I managed with my Bosch Wild, just slower. It is so much fun and also you feel your body again, you are a part of the ride and it made me so satisfied.
It's such a fun bike to ride and natural riding experience. I really do enjoy it now and trying to use it for maximum range....it's also quite efficient with a small 360wh battery.
I thought fuel eEX had a 560Wh bat.
Completly agree with you: "Rider be part of the ride!"
Has we have, rider is just a passager!
 
Yesterday, while watching XC Short Track, and seeing top attlets suffering on those climbs and in particular on the rock garden, i started thinking about The emtb thing, and Power questions.

Those guys, trainned attlets, pushing their heart out, were crawling that climb.
And here it heat me: Why on Earth would mtb be easy?

Also today, rode the ebike with the least power since I bought
200W and 30Nm.
For 25 (hard) kms, I was enjoying myself.
Yes it was slow, yes it was difficult and it hurt a little (not so much as doing it on a MTB).
When I switched to eMTB+ (600W/85Nm), I was like: what the hell???
Yes in this mode, I could climb faster, difficult technical climbs and have fun. But.... wasn't natural.

Ebikes are more close to bikes than motorcycles.
And having so much torque and power, the EMTB experience becomes... unatural, and it's Cycling nor Moto!

The conclusion I've reached:

MTB / eMTB is not easy. Anything to put hard trails easy, is simply and plain stupid. It's supose to be hard.
Applying more power (which ever will be the limit), so that someone with no fitness or with health condition, can enjoy it, is not the solution.
Those that cannot do with a mere 600W/85Nm, should use easier trails.
Not the way around - More Power so that Trails become easier.


I know this position won't have likes and should end with a lot of rant, but thruth is:

Watch XC at the highest level. You should be able to climb all those climbs with a "mere" 600W/85Nm (And these values are really friendly! I can climb most dual track/width tracks with 1 leg! Even those ar +20%).

EMTb should not exceed what those Professional riders do.

Moto ain't eMTB and vice versa.
For ALL that never rode Moto and confuse eMTB with Moto, just watch the video....
NO eMTB will ever do that, unless it has so much power/weight ratio as that moto (+50hp, 200kg rider+moto)



The video (the forum wasn't accepting the file):


This is MOTO, and no time soon will I see an eMTB climbing that, unless some puts cranks and pedals on a Stark, and calls it an eBIKE
First of all, what is an attlet? 2nd, opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. But just because you have an opinion, doesn’t mean you’re right or that you get to dictate what anyone else thinks or does. I don’t ride my ebike for the workout, I do it for the fun. The workout is a bonus. Most of your rant doesn’t even make any sense. Emtb isn’t supposed to be hard, it’s whatever you want it to be. If you want it to be hard, you can run in eco or reduce the power and make it slow. If you want to go hard and fast and challenge yourself with the most technical trails, you can put it in turbo and have a blast doing it. There is no right or wrong, just the riders preference. To me, one of those is fun, the other is not. The extra power is just a tool to help you get the job done easier or faster. I personally like go to fast on challenging terrain. I like to see how fast I can do the hardest trails up and down and I’d rather do it in a Ferrari rather than a Prius.
 
First of all, what is an attlet? 2nd, opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. But just because you have an opinion, doesn’t mean you’re right or that you get to dictate what anyone else thinks or does. I don’t ride my ebike for the workout, I do it for the fun. The workout is a bonus. Most of your rant doesn’t even make any sense. Emtb isn’t supposed to be hard, it’s whatever you want it to be. If you want it to be hard, you can run in eco or reduce the power and make it slow. If you want to go hard and fast and challenge yourself with the most technical trails, you can put it in turbo and have a blast doing it. There is no right or wrong, just the riders preference. To me, one of those is fun, the other is not. The extra power is just a tool to help you get the job done easier or faster. I personally like go to fast on challenging terrain. I like to see how fast I can do the hardest trails up and down and I’d rather do it in a Ferrari rather than a Prius.
Well... hope you get through the first question with Google/Chatgpt/what ever.

Regarding the 2nd, get this clear as water: I'm not making my position universal.
One thing must be clear:
Not ALL mtb trails are made to be easy
Not all rides are made easy or all have what it requires to accomplish.
 
Well... hope you get through the first question with Google/Chatgpt/what ever.

Regarding the 2nd, get this clear as water: I'm not making my position universal.
One thing must be clear:
Not ALL mtb trails are made to be easy
Not all rides are made easy or all have what it requires to accomplish.
🤦🏻 Google or ChatGPT can’t figure out what an attlet is or what you were trying to say. However I can surmise the word you’re looking for is athlete not attlet. The rest of your reply is the same as the previous one, you’re not making any sense bro!
 
Keep reading
    Browse all

    Similar Threads

    Community Stats

    Since 2018
    671K
    Messages
    41,203
    Members
    Join 30,000+ Riders, it's free!
    Back
    Top