Ok so you’re velduro, you are sitting on X number of m1 motors delaying the release of your bike to make refinements to the frame for cat 5 rating for your customers and making sure everything is safe (that was the delay reason right?). I’m sure this whole process is a ton of work and you don’t have the pockets of a big company like specialized. Finally all good and ship out. Now new motor drops.
So just tell me what you guys are wanting to happen here? Like what would you do as the owner of a small bike company? You’re delivering the bike these customers ordered (although delayed but for good reason). Now you got a bunch of emails from guys demanding a M2s upgrade for a discount which literally you cannot get from avinox and hasn’t been approved for individual sale.
Do you understand why a lot of us don’t sympathize with you? The bike is good right? The m17s will be ready for you when you decide to get the next bike.
As for the exact reasons they chose to release when they did, we can only speculate. Financial pressure and contractual obligations are possible factors, but there could equally be other considerations as well. That’s not really for me to speculate on.
What I don’t think is unreasonable though is assuming OEMs likely had awareness these bikes would be superseded within a relatively short timeframe by the time the first customer bikes started shipping.
As you mentioned yourself, even the CAT5 testing caused delays, and beyond that you still have product planning, frame development around revised battery systems, fatigue testing, validation, certification and production timelines. The 27+ brands that launched on 9 April didn’t suddenly start that process a few weeks beforehand.
I think I’ve already been pretty clear on commercially reasonable options they could explore that, depending on how they chose to structure and roll them out, don’t require them to lose money. I also don’t think I’ve seen anyone here asking for something for free.
And while I appreciate Velduro is a small business, I don’t think being a smaller company automatically excludes them from planning for something like this or handling customer retention appropriately.
I also don’t think it’s unreasonable for customers to question value retention after paying close to $9000 NZD for a frame, in some cases only weeks before the 9 April launch, and now seeing that same brand new M1 frame still in the box advertised on Trade Me for $6000 NZD.
That’s a pretty solid real-world data point around where the market now sees the value of these bikes, and naturally raises the question of where a second hand M1 sits only a few weeks later.