MotorDoper
Member
Edit: Updating the original post slightly to clarify a few recurring points and questions that have come up throughout the thread.
Seeing the same Rogue frame start shipping with the M2S system, in some cases only weeks after purchase for recent buyers, with no upgrade pathway for M1 owners, has been pretty hard to swallow.
To be clear, this was never about demanding free upgrades or claiming the M1 is suddenly a bad motor. The M1 is still an excellent system and I fully understand technology moves quickly.
The core issue being discussed is the unusually compressed delivery-to-supersession window for buyers (3.5 mths to weeks). First customer bikes started arriving in late December, the embargo lifted on 9 April, and many owners only received bikes in January, February and March.
I’ve been engaging with Velduro asking for one thing only: access to the M2S system, or some form of commercially reasonable upgrade pathway, at a fair price. The frame itself hasn’t changed and these systems are already being fitted to current builds.
The resulting depreciation impact is also hard to ignore when, a month after the April 9 launch, there are already brand new M1 frames still in the box being advertised for $6000 NZD. That naturally raises questions around where the value of existing owner bikes now sits.
A lot of comments also seem to assume all consumers were closely following forum rumours and speculation around future Avinox launches. In reality, many normal buyers simply purchased through dealers, events or local shops without tracking potential future product releases.
This also isn’t about normal bike depreciation. Most owners fully understand bikes lose value and technology moves quickly. The concern is the excessive depreciation impact created by such an unusually short delivery-to-supersession window.
I’m genuinely interested to hear from other actual owners around how they feel about the timing and depreciation impact surrounding all of this.
Seeing the same Rogue frame start shipping with the M2S system, in some cases only weeks after purchase for recent buyers, with no upgrade pathway for M1 owners, has been pretty hard to swallow.
To be clear, this was never about demanding free upgrades or claiming the M1 is suddenly a bad motor. The M1 is still an excellent system and I fully understand technology moves quickly.
The core issue being discussed is the unusually compressed delivery-to-supersession window for buyers (3.5 mths to weeks). First customer bikes started arriving in late December, the embargo lifted on 9 April, and many owners only received bikes in January, February and March.
I’ve been engaging with Velduro asking for one thing only: access to the M2S system, or some form of commercially reasonable upgrade pathway, at a fair price. The frame itself hasn’t changed and these systems are already being fitted to current builds.
The resulting depreciation impact is also hard to ignore when, a month after the April 9 launch, there are already brand new M1 frames still in the box being advertised for $6000 NZD. That naturally raises questions around where the value of existing owner bikes now sits.
A lot of comments also seem to assume all consumers were closely following forum rumours and speculation around future Avinox launches. In reality, many normal buyers simply purchased through dealers, events or local shops without tracking potential future product releases.
This also isn’t about normal bike depreciation. Most owners fully understand bikes lose value and technology moves quickly. The concern is the excessive depreciation impact created by such an unusually short delivery-to-supersession window.
I’m genuinely interested to hear from other actual owners around how they feel about the timing and depreciation impact surrounding all of this.
Last edited: