SteAmtb
Member
I suspect we all have somewhat different perspectives. Friends love theirs, but the lightness of the Amflow didn’t feel like it had those same advantages for me, and didn’t match the feel of my Tyee, which is brilliant at doing stuff like a manual off a decent size drop from near standstill for example. I’m a big fan of my heavy ass Lapierre at the moment, especially on very technical downhill tracks, it feels both stable and agile, just perfect. It sucks at some stuff though, like drops from near stationary and bunny hopping on the flat without a bump jump on an obstacle like a fallen tree.The lightness of the Amflow helps me clear obstacles, on both ascending and descending. It's easier to get the bike in the air, and I also feel more in control of the bike when airbourne. The Merida was 25kgs. The Amflow just over 20kgs. I find the weight of the bike makes a big difference in your ability to move it around under you.
The power and torque of the motor also helps in getting your front wheel up, when leaping off things. You only need a shorter take off area. It also gives me more time to focus on getting the rear wheel up as well, if needed.
I also just take different lines on the Amflow. I tend to just go over stuff rather than round it, because of the listed above benefits.
That said. If it's just rooty, chunky, technical downhill. The Merida definitely ploughed through better. It's why I want a Flux as the stablemate to the Amflow. But I would also consider an Amflow Enduro, if they release it in 2026.
Interestingly, my 36 kg daughter has a Merida e One Sixty that is around 26 kg. She literally jumps to the moon and back, it blows my mind with how she pops and jumps that bike, especially on some quite serious trails. Running it back to back with her 15kg Canyon, she is more agile, a lot faster and jumps better on the Merida, in her words, she has a stable base to move the bike where she wants it to go instead of getting pinged around, her popping: