All New 2026 Santa Cruz Bullit launched

Is the stem 35 or 31.6mm? I don't see the info on the SC site, and I want to swap the bars.
35mm

Actually, now I'm not so confident. In some view I was looking at yesterday I swear it separately called out 35mm rise and 35mm bar size, now I only see it mentioning the rise. For what it's wroth, the 42mm stem from OneUp I see is for 35mm bars.
 
⚡ EMTB Pro Go Pro — exclusive discounts & ad-free Peaty's 25% off & more · Ad-free browsing · Pro badge See the deals →
Honestly I havent ridden both anywhere near enough to comment, but the Unno with 800Wh battery and lighter, with more powerful motor seems like you can (almost) have it all. Non removable battery will not be for everyone.

I actually think that the 4 bar on the new Santa Cruz is brilliant in terms of suspension performance. I really need to try the Unno on my home trails to work out how it performs. I'm also consious that I cant fit a massive dropper on the Unno.

One thing is for sure, I could never have a 600Wh bike, it would just not last me long enough for my personal use case.

That Bullit would almost be perfect if it had a 800Wh removable.

For sure the Mith is charming as hell on a paper. Weight, looks & power are all on point.

But look, Horst Link/ 4 bar/ whatever you call it, just performs BETTER than the other suspension designs. The other options were simply to get around HL patents, that have since expired, which is why most good bikes have now swapped to HL. HL is not the lightest, however. Performance has a weight penalty sometimes, but in this case that small weight penalty is one of the most important aspects of a bike's overall performance.

That's the danger of the 'spec' comparison. It just doesn't tell you how the bike will actually work.

I hope the Mith does all of the things very well. Rear suspension, front end traction, dropper insertion, quality of the bike overall, because I'd very seriously consider buying it.

But in the real world, the latest Transitions and Santa Cruz's are almost certainly going to be superior bikes for most riders, 'slow' Bosch motor and all. They will be balanced, reliable, well supported, etc.

I look forward to the Mith review, and I really hope that your review is a very straightforward assessment. I mean, you were in Cesar's luxury car last week. That's a lot of pressure to provide a favorable review.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, Non removable batteries are a deal breaker for me. I want to be able to charge the battery remotely when im staying in hotels that sometimes don't let bikes stay in the room.

I also want to have dual battery option for park days mid day swap out. For me thats 400hw and 600wh. Circle back to the car and swap into the next battery. Then on shorter ride days I can enjoy the extra light weight of the 400wh.

I do a lot of short sharp rides sub 2 hrs and can smash that on a 400wh. I want full power with weight close to mid power then I can.

So yeah, Bullet does not make my grade.
 
Seems to be quite a few comparisson regarding the range between DJI bikes with 800wh and Bosch 600wh. Of course, they don't push out the the same power (at least for now) but Will has done an awesome comparisson between the Amflow with 800 wh and a heavier 800wh Bosch bike :


It's not super scientific, but Bosch was 20% more efficient.

That means that a ~600wh Bosch Battery at the same pace with a 800 DJI bike will output around the same range.
 
I think you need to remember the Bosch is underpowered compare to the DJI and on Will range test this could by why there is better efficiency. When we get the 100nm/ 750 W peak power update it will drain the 600/800 watt battery faster
 
Seems to be quite a few comparisson regarding the range between DJI bikes with 800wh and Bosch 600wh. Of course, they don't push out the the same power (at least for now) but Will has done an awesome comparisson between the Amflow with 800 wh and a heavier 800wh Bosch bike :


It's not super scientific, but Bosch was 20% more efficient.

That means that a ~600wh Bosch Battery at the same pace with a 800 DJI bike will output around the same range.
I get what they did, but there was really no point in doing it with the Amflow knowingly putting out a lot more grunt. It really should have been done on the second highest assist level for the Amflow to more closely represent the output of the Bosch on its own Turbo setting.

People seem to focus a ton on efficiency, but there's very little variation between any of these motors in terms of efficiency. They're all using a brushless motor of pretty similar size and construction to power the identical drivetrain (Chain ring, chain, cassette, wheels/tires) between bikes. The perceived efficiency is almost entirely the result of tunes on different motors actually providing different levels of assist throughout the band of cadences. Yes, you might go further on one motor vs another, but the motor probably actually did less work to go that distance. The differences in raw efficiency of these motors themselves are likely within a 2-3% range. Just look at the EV world, efficiencies in those drivetrains are relatively close from one manufacturer to the other because they're all pulling from the same pool of raw suppliers for batteries, controllers, and motors.

Maybe the problem is people confusing range with efficiency as well. Some seem to use the terms interchangeably, but they're not the same thing at all. When we talk about afficiency we should be talking about how much of th raw power stored in the battery can be output from the motor. The biggest thing that would kill that in these bikes is heat. Any motor that is known to "run hot" would definitely be killing its efficiency and I'd expect a measurable drop in potential use versus when it's at a much cooler operting temperature. The next would be drivetrain drag within the motor, but even those are all on such similar designs at this point between manufacturers. I think DJI is probably the one outlier in that regard with their planetary gears. I believe the Bosch/Spesh/Bafang (If anyone cares about Bafang, I do) design is pretty similar internally isn't it?
 
Last edited:
If they stuck with each other throughout the ride as they appear to of, surely that means they should have used the same amount of power? Unless Will was braking unnecessarily which I can’t imagine he would if trying to do a test.
 
I hope that the new Bullit is not as popular as Vala, so that I have a chance of getting one. Waited 6 months for Vala before the factory said they are not able to deliver my bike. Santa Cruz is becoming like Rolex - go to the dealer with 10k in hand, only to be told you have to wait for 2 years.

That’s crazy! My local SC dealer has 3 Valas that he can’t seem to sell, we are in a fairly remote area of Scotland though.
 
If they stuck with each other throughout the ride as they appear to of, surely that means they should have used the same amount of power? Unless Will was braking unnecessarily which I can’t imagine he would if trying to do a test.
Not necessarily, you can still speed up, slow down, speed up, slow down and still generally stick with the other rider, which is very inefficient. They could also be putting in different levels of effort themselves to be going that same general speed. They specifically called out in the video that the guy on the Amflow was going up the hill a heck of a lot easier than the one on the Bosch, mentioning that the Amflow passed the other guy up the hill with ease. They even admitted themselves in the video what I described above, and that the Amflow was definitely "doing more" during parts of the ride than the Bosch was.

Keep in mind, accelerating faster to the same speed is still using more power, not necessarily less efficient, so every time the Avinox is kicking out a few extra Nm of torque to help the rider along more than the Bosch is, it's not necessarily less efficient, it's just doing more work. The only scientific way to actually measure efficiency would be on some sort of dyno measuring the output shaft of the motors while monitoring current through the battery and having a throttle to make the motor go.
 
Don't get me wrong here, I know a bit of physics and it's clear the Bosch rider pushed a bit more but it's not like one was exhausted and the other one could do 10 more laps. I just wanted to point out that with a bit more effort, the 600 wh Bosch bike could hang on with the DJI 800wh. Range and bigger batter is good but I wouldn't necessarily rule out the SC bikes just because they have the 600wh batteries.
 
Looks great, the battery size is more of a Bosch problem than a Santa Cruz problem. We should all be bitching at Bosch as to why they made the 800wh battery the size they did. We could dream and hope they make a 800wh the same size as the 600wh as technology improves but its Bosch and they are not known for backwards compatibility.

At 50 years old 600wh is perfect for me so I'm happy. I can see how younger guys would want to ride longer and not use that ugly ass range extender.
Im 57, and my 750 battery is not enough,i have good battery management,but i like to be out all day and put in the miles,a 1000 wh battery,the size of my fist and weighing 250 grams would be great! 😂
hold on!
what about plutonium?😳
 
Im 57, and my 750 battery is not enough,i have good battery management,but i like to be out all day and put in the miles,a 1000 wh battery,the size of my fist and weighing 250 grams would be great! 😂
hold on!
what about plutonium?😳

Aroused Hard Ons GIF
 
That’s crazy! My local SC dealer has 3 Valas that he can’t seem to sell, we are in a fairly remote area of Scotland though.
What build though? Plenty of the non Axs build The only Medium I could Find was an XX at £12k. The XO at £10k is far better value but not available.
 
Also Mith £10k and Bullit 10k in similar XO build.
Bullit needs range extender £400 and screen upgrade £400 (when available) so Mith better value.
The warranty and back up (if) you get an issue is my only concern. I’m always glass half full type of guy though (but it’s still a concern) 🤷‍♂️
 
What build though? Plenty of the non Axs build The only Medium I could Find was an XX at £12k. The XO at £10k is far better value but not available.

He’s got a R build in small and two GX AXS builds, one M and one L.
 
Got mine yesterday from The Path Bike Shop in Tustin CA. We had a crew of 5 of them last night out for a maiden voyage. This bike absolutely rips. I thought the marketing for this bike was pretty lame initially, with the whole downhill bike thing. After riding it, I can't say I disagree. This thing blows my transition relay completely out of the water. Honestly this bike is so fast and capable it's a bit intimidating.

1000005551.jpg
 
Got mine yesterday from The Path Bike Shop in Tustin CA. We had a crew of 5 of them last night out for a maiden voyage. This bike absolutely rips. I thought the marketing for this bike was pretty lame initially, with the whole downhill bike thing. After riding it, I can't say I disagree. This thing blows my transition relay completely out of the water. Honestly this bike is so fast and capable it's a bit intimidating.

blows your previous out of the water?
seriously😂
 
Don't get me wrong here, I know a bit of physics and it's clear the Bosch rider pushed a bit more but it's not like one was exhausted and the other one could do 10 more laps. I just wanted to point out that with a bit more effort, the 600 wh Bosch bike could hang on with the DJI 800wh. Range and bigger batter is good but I wouldn't necessarily rule out the SC bikes just because they have the 600wh batteries.
I really wish just one damn YouTube reviewer would normalize the power input and overall speed between the Gen5 Bosch & the DJI and give us a real range test. I could drive my truck at 80mph and average 15 mpg or at 65 mph and average 20mpg. But it's the same truck, speed matters!

If it's true that a 600-watt battery Bosch travels nearly or even just as far as the DJI 800-watt battery, that means in the real world that the Bosch is actually lighter at the same distance. And with the RE, the Bosch is the same weight as the DJI 800 yet travels way further.

I expect we'll see another 5 'range tests' that don't normalize for speed and rider input, so we still won't ever know.

The Bosch Gen5 is better in terms of noise, support & probably tariffs if you are an American.
However, if the Bosch is also more efficient and technically lighter (per mile ridden), then the DJI only has two advantages left: how well it's hidden and integrated (very nice) & the extreme power/ plus the screen (if you care) which is an advantage that is going away shortly.
 
Got mine yesterday from The Path Bike Shop in Tustin CA. We had a crew of 5 of them last night out for a maiden voyage. This bike absolutely rips. I thought the marketing for this bike was pretty lame initially, with the whole downhill bike thing. After riding it, I can't say I disagree. This thing blows my transition relay completely out of the water. Honestly this bike is so fast and capable it's a bit intimidating.

View attachment 158646
How do you find it with and without the range extender ?

I have been riding a relay too!
 
I really wish just one damn YouTube reviewer would normalize the power input and overall speed between the Gen5 Bosch & the DJI and give us a real range test. I could drive my truck at 80mph and average 15 mpg or at 65 mph and average 20mpg. But it's the same truck, speed matters!

If it's true that a 600-watt battery Bosch travels nearly or even just as far as the DJI 800-watt battery, that means in the real world that the Bosch is actually lighter at the same distance. And with the RE, the Bosch is the same weight as the DJI 800 yet travels way further.

I expect we'll see another 5 'range tests' that don't normalize for speed and rider input, so we still won't ever know.

The Bosch Gen5 is better in terms of noise, support & probably tariffs if you are an American.
However, if the Bosch is also more efficient and technically lighter (per mile ridden), then the DJI only has two advantages left: how well it's hidden and integrated (very nice) & the extreme power/ plus the screen (if you care) which is an advantage that is going away shortly.
The DJI bikes still have the weight advantage a little bit. The 800Wh DJI bikes are coming in at a similar weight to the 600Wh Bosch bikes from what I've seen.

Their 600Wh battery is 2.87Kg to Bosch's 3.0Kg, and their 800Wh is 3.74Kg to Bosch's 3.90Kg. Not a huge difference, but it's something. Pair that with the range extender weighing 1.58Kg with the hardware and you end up having the 850Wh Bosch extended battery being .68Kg heavier overall than the 800Wh DJI battery setup. Their motor itself is also lighter by .32Kg and you end up with an exactly 1Kg difference in weight in the motor/battery setup in a Bosch 600Wh w/extender vs a DJI 800Wh. Yes, you're getting 50 additional Wh in capacity, but at the cost of a full kilo (2.2lbs) which is definitely "something".

Sure would be nice to see Bosch come out with a 700-720Wh battery that is the same width as the 600Wh but just a bit longer next year to allow some of the existing frames built around the 600Wh possibly take advantage of it. Unlikely, I know, but it would be nice to have a more reasonable capacity where most people aren't worried about adding an RE anymore and still be able to fit it into a respectable looking downtube.
 
That’s crazy! My local SC dealer has 3 Valas that he can’t seem to sell, we are in a fairly remote area of Scotland though.
In Portugal, last week, my local SC dealer, showed me the ordering website of the Portuguese stores where there was only one size of one Vala model available. All the other Vala models did not have any size available.
 
The DJI bikes still have the weight advantage a little bit. The 800Wh DJI bikes are coming in at a similar weight to the 600Wh Bosch bikes from what I've seen.

Their 600Wh battery is 2.87Kg to Bosch's 3.0Kg, and their 800Wh is 3.74Kg to Bosch's 3.90Kg. Not a huge difference, but it's something. Pair that with the range extender weighing 1.58Kg with the hardware and you end up having the 850Wh Bosch extended battery being .68Kg heavier overall than the 800Wh DJI battery setup. Their motor itself is also lighter by .32Kg and you end up with an exactly 1Kg difference in weight in the motor/battery setup in a Bosch 600Wh w/extender vs a DJI 800Wh. Yes, you're getting 50 additional Wh in capacity, but at the cost of a full kilo (2.2lbs) which is definitely "something".

Sure would be nice to see Bosch come out with a 700-720Wh battery that is the same width as the 600Wh but just a bit longer next year to allow some of the existing frames built around the 600Wh possibly take advantage of it. Unlikely, I know, but it would be nice to have a more reasonable capacity where most people aren't worried about adding an RE anymore and still be able to fit it into a respectable looking downtube.

Thanks for the math. But I guess my point is that if the Bosch with a 600-watt travels just as far as the DJI 800 watt, it's effectively a lighter package. Exactly .42 kgs, or basically one pound lighter actually using your numbers.

I finally watched that entire range comparison posted above. There was one climb where the extra DJI power offered additional assistance, and he only utilized it for a moment at the very top.

The DJI also got quite the 'range' boost because at the end, the rider had to ride the DJI with no assistance whereas the Bosch rider still had full assistance. In that time period the Bosch dropped another 7%.

In the end the Bosch had 20% battery juice and the DJI showed 4%. Assuming that the Bosch also provides no assistance at 5% like the DJI did, the Bosch used 26.6 watts per mile where-as the DJI used 31.9 watts per mile (really it was less miles as it was ridden without assistance).

Assuming same conditions, same riders, 95% battery usage, etc. that equates to the following:
1) Bosch 600 watt goes 21.4 miles.
2) Bosch 600 watt with 250 RE goes 30.4 miles.
3) Bosch 800 watt goes 28.6 miles.
4) Bosch 800 watt with RE goes 37.5 miles.
5) DJI 600 watt goes 17.9 miles
6) DJI 800 watt goes 23.8 miles.

Like I indicated above, the difference was probably more pronounced and even more in favor of Bosch efficiency if they would have recorded the mileage when the DJI went in to limp mode, then did the same for the Bosch.

Of course, there are a few other small faults in the above test. Tire pressure, the Amflow is super lightweight, the 600 Bosch would technically get a bit better as it would be lighter, etc.

I'm pretty convinced that running the 600 watt Bosch for most rides which is very close to the miles that an 800 watt DJI would do. Then you can add the RE for your big days and blow way past the DJI 800. Also, there are 800 watt Bosch's out there, namely the Norco VLT.

I'm really interested in the E-druid, but the HP will absolutely eat up a bit more range as well.

I ran the same efficiency comparisons on the mid power motors before I bought my Relay and noticed that the per mile of climbing of the Fazua, was more efficient. I think those German engineers have really worked on the efficiency of their motors and it shows.
 
Last edited:
It's not super scientific, but Bosch was 20% more efficient.
Thanks for the math. But I guess my point is that if the Bosch with a 600-watt travels just as far as the DJI 800 watt
I think you both seem to be using Man Math to make your arguments fit your purposes - there's nothing wrong with that - we all do it - especially when buying a new bike :cool:

However, they both rode in turbo.

So yes, the DJI ran out of power first. Not because of a 20% efficiency difference, but because the Amflow in Turbo provides considerably more assistance than the Bosch in Turbo. Will basically had a far far easier ride on the Amflow.

More assistance will use more power. Like they said, for comparable performance, he should probably have run the Amflow in Trail as that much more like the Bosch in Turbo.
 
Keep reading
    Browse all

    Similar Threads

    Community Stats

    Since 2018
    668K
    Messages
    40,742
    Members
    Join 30,000+ Riders, it's free!
    Back
    Top