My Markhor Kunlun

zorro77

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2021
Messages
328
Reaction score
488
Location
Italy
Here we are, kunlun S3 (I'm 174cm):

10 days to prepare custom colour, 7 days to receive it

pacco.jpg


scartamento.jpg


toki.jpg


Let's do it:

montaggio.jpg


Dyedbro frame protector

dyedbro.jpg


chainguard:
tendicatena.jpg


Shimano XT easy to install, and formula rotors 203 2.3
xt.jpg


heat shrink tubing for sorting the tubing

termo.jpg


2 weeks later arrives the battery and the display Lives

batt.jpg


finally this is my Kunlun :love:

prof.jpg

fro2.jpg


fro1.jpg


And this is with the YT Fidlock 835ml

fidl.jpg
 
⚡ EMTB Pro Go Pro — exclusive discounts & ad-free Peaty's 25% off & more · Ad-free browsing · Pro badge See the deals →
Only measurements will show this, but from the photo everything looks extremely dangerous
sorry I don't understand, what's the problem?
I use the same shox on the Levo and there is no problem

lev.jpg
 
Last edited:
Your contribution is really very important, I don't know how to thank you, how I have lived without it until today 🤣
Usually, a person will break the part first. And then he starts reading the instructions.
 
I know what fox says. I have already used on kenevo without problems. This is my 4th Levo and I have no problems with 230x65 + cascade. Markhor Riders use spring-loaded Foxes and there are no problems. Thanks anyway.
 
very nice custom collour !

i read all the documentation about linkage driven coil designs and all the warnings... i seen plenty of pics what can happen when you dont..
also the shock will wear down very quickly if you dont have the right model certified for linkage driven designs.


myself i went for Rockshox deluxe ultimate DH shock in B1 model. this is a special model certified for linkage driven systems with a steel shaft.
my 196mm rear came with a shorter linkage and it was inside the specs of what rockshocks says in their websites/documents.

i think it is something very serious that needs to be considered when choosing spec but not impossible.
i would AVOID all aluminum shaft shocks though just to be sure.
 
The yoke on these looks ridiculous. There was a post on the ohlins fb page recently that was swiftly removed showing a ttx22 where the eyelet was snapped in half due to the leverage.
 
The problem is usually on Specializeds because they don't work in line but obliquely.
This works perfectly in line.
@cozzy have you seen the photo of the ttx on this specific frame? kunlun?
 
The problem is usually on Specializeds because they don't work in line but obliquely.
This works perfectly in line.
@cozzy have you seen the photo of the ttx on this specific frame? kunlun?
Yes. It was still on the frame and the eyelet was snapped.
It doesn't look like the eyelet goes far into the yoke like the specialized design.
 
Yes. It was still on the frame and the eyelet was snapped.
It doesn't look like the eyelet goes far into the yoke like the specialized design.
If you find the photo, post it or send it to me in PVT or the link, thanks
 
Very strange how it broke, usually the stem attachment breaks, not the eye. Maybe it's just an impression, but isn't that spring too short?
 
Ooh, was about to order a Kunlun and now I'm skeptical (already have the ohlins coil to put on the bike). Will have to sell and go air I guess. Are we sure the linkage is OK for air? I ride pretty hard.
Recon it would be ok with the longer shock and hence shorter yoke.
 
Yes. It has two sets of yokes to choose from. By inspection, the yokes does not look beefy compared to E10.
 
Yes. It has two sets of yokes to choose from. By inspection, the yokes does not look beefy compared to E10.
did you compare this on pictures or did you see them
side by side ?

i mean i have and the Markhor parts looked and feel much higher end and much beafier. its also longer and heavier but it is a nice machined cnc yoke. i think there are some clear pics in my build thread
 
The firmware setting which came with the bike is bad. It is too sterile and doesn't represent what the motor is capable of. I am not sure if the controller is different from the stock Bafang M560. My Bafang M560 500W has better power profile than the Markhor supplied Bafang 750w.

I confirm the same experience on my Kun Lun, although I had ordered a 750w M560 I received a 500w one which was not able to reach 900w in boost. I loaded the 750w firmware and now the motor delivers impressive thrust and is almost 1,200w
 
I confirm the same experience on my Kun Lun, although I had ordered a 750w M560 I received a 500w one which was not able to reach 900w in boost. I loaded the 750w firmware and now the motor delivers impressive thrust and is almost 1,200w
Where did you get software from?
 
Where did you get software from?

post 428 Bafang engines section - M560

 
IMG_1880.jpeg
5780144e-3917-4e84-a43f-ab3387491b47.jpeg

23kg. Ditch the markhor firmware and loaded the Bafang 1.5 750w firmware and set the power profile above and you have power throughout the range even at low cadence. There is no more power cutoff at low speed or low cadence as provided by the markhor firmware.
 
Keep reading
    Browse all

    Similar Threads

    Community Stats

    Since 2018
    669K
    Messages
    40,827
    Members
    Join 30,000+ Riders, it's free!
    Back
    Top