Other 2025 Rail Gen5 bikes

⚡ EMTB Pro Go Pro — exclusive discounts & ad-free Peaty's 25% off & more · Ad-free browsing · Pro badge See the deals →
Is that stock weight? I don’t see how the new one could be heavier. The Gen 5 motor should be 100 grams lighter and the new 800 Wh battery is 400 grams lighter than the previous 750 Wh battery.
Yes that is stock weight, added ME700 spd pedals and lighter tyres. Weighed in at 23.4kg
 
lol at gram counters on e bikes. Fun fact, bikes without motors and batteries weigh less than e bikes. You worried about weight, ride a meat powered bike.
Looking at the weight doesn’t mean I’m worried about it. I wouldn’t buy it if I was. But since this is an enthusiast forum, weight is a factor (among others) in both handling and distance. And as an enthusiast I’m curious about the factors that go into the weight. Is that okay with you?
 
Looking at the weight doesn’t mean I’m worried about it. I wouldn’t buy it if I was. But since this is an enthusiast forum, weight is a factor (among others) in both handling and distance. And as an enthusiast I’m curious about the factors that go into the weight. Is that okay with you?
The extra weight was needed, I have seen 2 cracked Rail frames and trek increased the travel on the new rail. More travel generally means people are going to ride them harder.
 
lol at gram counters on e bikes. Fun fact, bikes without motors and batteries weigh less than e bikes. You worried about weight, ride a meat powered bike.
If I am racing bio then I am concerned about grams overall. On a full-power ebike not so much, but I am concerned about performance and counting grams on rotational and unsprung mass is critical. I have run 170mm forks on my rails for last four years and stroked the shock to 62.5mm.

For a given price point manufacturers should be selling us Al frames with carbon wheels instead of carbon frames with Al wheels.
 
Is that stock weight? I don’t see how the new one could be heavier. The Gen 5 motor should be 100 grams lighter and the new 800 Wh battery is 400 grams lighter than the previous 750 Wh battery.
Nice big battery that 👌
 
Agree with last comments.... how/why the new Rail+ could be heavier?
:unsure:
In italy is still missed.... do you see it "live" in any shop/showroom?
 
Strange. According to the website: the Rail 5 should be 25,28 kg (med). But according to this YT-short, some store has weighed it to be 1 kg less; 24,23: - YouTube
 
😜😜😜

PXL_20250117_115648211_exported_3842.jpg
 
Strangely, these bikes are already being delivered in at least limited quantities in Europe, but there are absolutely no ride reviews anywhere.
It looks like one of the most interesting new Bosch gen5 bikes; the only strange thing is the big gap between M (450mm reach) and L sizes (490 mm reach). Anyway, any fresh owners out there, let us know your thoughts.
 
Strangely, these bikes are already being delivered in at least limited quantities in Europe, but there are absolutely no ride reviews anywhere.
It looks like one of the most interesting new Bosch gen5 bikes; the only strange thing is the big gap between M (450mm reach) and L sizes (490 mm reach). Anyway, any fresh owners out there, let us know your thoughts.
My ideal reach is 460 mm and ideal size ML so would 'fall through the crack'. Will stay with what I have, 2022 Rail 5 (alloy) L, even with that had to mess around with the cockpit. Wife's 2022 Rail 5 (alloy) M definitely too small for me.
 
Last edited:
Strangely, these bikes are already being delivered in at least limited quantities in Europe, but there are absolutely no ride reviews anywhere.
It looks like one of the most interesting new Bosch gen5 bikes; the only strange thing is the big gap between M (450mm reach) and L sizes (490 mm reach). Anyway, any fresh owners out there, let us know your thoughts.
Indeed strange. No mention of them on the US site, either. Would be nice if @gfunkmc gave a ride report of it. Curious to hear about it.
 
My ideal reach is 460 mm and ideal size ML so would 'fall through the crack'. Will stay with what I have, 2022 Rail 5 (alloy) L, even with that had to mess around with the cockpit. Wife's 2022 Rail 5 (alloy) M definitely too small for me.
Slide your saddle back on its rails and add 10 mm to your stem …… maybe get a different bar rise….. what’s the problem?
 
Indeed strange. No mention of them on the US site, either. Would be nice if @gfunkmc gave a ride report of it. Curious to hear about it.
This is the 5th rail IV had over last 5 years so safe to say I get on with them ..IV had XL and large in both alloys and carbon .. this one's a alloy in large .. wasn't impressed that they changed to mullet only coming from full 29 and not impressed they changed the shock size as I usually buy a low spec bike and put all my components on there so had to buy a new shock and build a 27.5 rear wheel ... Didn't think it would ride that differently than the other 4 rails IV had but I was wrong .. this thing rips 🔥🔥.. got it in the low setting ATM with no peddle clearance issues it corners real well and feels plush and planted .. the changes to cable routing, seattube angle and toptube angle are good too
 
To be fair Sliding the seat back can put you too far back for climbing and a longer stem slows the steering down so for me thats a compromise because the frames the wrong size (y)

Theres no doubt they have dropped the ball with the massive jump between M and L on the new models
so it will be the last trek rail i buy for a long time .
Sliding the saddle back on the rails is good for about a degree seat post angle so saying you are too far back is a bit off. As someone that has an upper body that is size medium reach but legs that are a size small standover I have been making bikes fit all my life. You ether try to make the bike fit or move on. Maybe trek is not your brand.
 
This is the 5th rail IV had over last 5 years so safe to say I get on with them ..IV had XL and large in both alloys and carbon .. this one's a alloy in large .. wasn't impressed that they changed to mullet only coming from full 29 and not impressed they changed the shock size as I usually buy a low spec bike and put all my components on there so had to buy a new shock and build a 27.5 rear wheel ... Didn't think it would ride that differently than the other 4 rails IV had but I was wrong .. this thing rips 🔥🔥.. got it in the low setting ATM with no peddle clearance issues it corners real well and feels plush and planted .. the changes to cable routing, seattube angle and toptube angle are good too
Thanks a bunch for the notes! I appreciate it. I'm on the hunt for something new and the Rail is on my list. I have been watching Gen4's (and the price reductions) but waiting for the Gen5's to come out in the US to get a better sense for pricing, spec, etc. (yeah, I've checked the sites outside of the US for spec so there shouldn't be any surprises). If you have any comments specifically about a Gen4 comparison to a Gen5, shoot me a DM.
 
I saw a new GEN5 Rail in ALU version (Italy) unfortunately I forgot to take pictures...
Still open questions on Gen 5
Why the weight is higher compared to previous versions?
Why battery consimption seems to be equivalent (or even worse) compared to GEN4?

I was interested on 9.8 GXAXS, available only in this colour .... thathas a kind of "white dots... dandruff" on lower part of the chassis... the bike seems always DIRTY!!
1738429699731.png


My current Rail 9.9 (2020) probably will continue to run for at least 1 year.... lighter than the new Gen5!
 
Slide your saddle back on its rails and add 10 mm to your stem …… maybe get a different bar rise….. what’s the problem?
Sliding your saddle back doesn't impact reach.... it only influences effective top tube feel. Reach is the horizontal distance between a vertical line from the center of bb and center of HT. Using a longer stem can help mitigate incorrect reach but also impacts steering.
 
Last edited:
(italian)
first STATIC impressions on a Rail + vs. previuos model.

better components with lower price
battery consumption higher... but motor has better response (?)
similar weight

I'm still suspicious to invest money in a new model....
 
I see a lot of complaints about sizing. Ive never understood MTB sizing jumps, im 6,2 got into the sport in 2016, my ideal size is 485mm. Now every XL bike is 500+ and the larges are 475ish. There is always a lot of complaints around large sizing, but larges are often bought by people from the 5,7-5,11 height ranges

I've got a canyon and a trek now as these bikes larges are in my sweet spot. Levos i can either ride a tiny 475mm or a boat of a 507mm. Yes, you can change stems but the bike size is still huge.

On topic the new trek is very nice! just not as nice as my canyon that cost half the price.
 
Hi mate, I’ve got a rail 5 on order and was wondering if it comes with the display on your bars, or did you add this afterwards? Kevin
Hello dude, had it supplied and fitted, wasn’t expensive, suggest you get the LBS to fit it, it’s informative and super discreet.
 
Keep reading
    Browse all

    Similar Threads

    Community Stats

    Since 2018
    668K
    Messages
    40,756
    Members
    Join 30,000+ Riders, it's free!
    Back
    Top