Firstly i am in agreement with you that the bikes are expensive for what they are, my point is who cares?
Just you and a minority of others that don’t. I’m not going to buy a loaf of bread for £10. These prices are very similar.
I don't care if you could buy 10 cars for the price of an s-works, or a whole terrace of houses in Wales.
This is a flippant point: it also is a huge insult to people who work for a lifetime to get just one house. All I need is somewhere of shelter to live, food and water in my belly, a mode of transport to navigate the world I live in and the information it holds, and clothes on my back. Everything else I see as an insult to those inalienable rights according to the Geneva convention.
I am interested in if its a good bike or not, it may be good value or bad value depending on each consumers point of view.
People should at least decide whether it’s a good bike or not by the spec, a review on a reliable website, and how it rides by testing it... agreed.
However, “Point of view” fallacy I particularly hate. The rights and empowerments of the individual are directly threatened, by decisions based on the thought construct of accepting all interpretations of what an individual can choose to be.
I would rather shackle myself to my ideals than accept another’s point of view.
At a basic level it makes no sense anyway: the agree to disagree, the “everything is an interpretation” lie.
The list goes on. There are definitive answers to everything out there. Yes’s and No’s.
A lot of the Specialized owners on her have bought them because they place a high value on the customer service they get from their local shops, and also the brands excellent reputation for customer care, and to a lot of people having that security when buying an expensive e-mtb is worth paying more for as it has value to them.
I see this as asking for other companies to do the same: have a cookie cutter strategy, and STILL undercut the premium service Specialized gives. I expect it will come in time.
Who says value is a quantum in every bike buyers thought process?
Those that don’t care about value in their lives do not care at all about their lives and by conclusion, care not about others. Finance at its least worst is where value is.
If i wanted the best road bike, or the best mountain bike for the riding i want to do, i would get the right bike and it would cost what it costs.
Road bikes are a single functional device. It does it well, being a specialised product.
A mountain bike can be a multi functioning device (road and off-road).That immediately brings it into the realms of more purpose.
I have a lot of issues with the idea of a road bike, and the idea of the race to compete. Professionals become amateurs at pleasure: athletes that usually win, usually do so at the cost of everything else.
I have a client who has a 10K Pinarello Dogma he uses as an indoor training bike, and it has never seen daylight - the reason he has it is he wants to train on the same bike as his road bike, and the value of being able to do that was more important than the value of the purchase.
This idea of training proves my point: racing is a flawed concept in the world we should want to live in. The only race I believe in is the human race.
If i wanted the best value bike, then i would get the bike that has the best mix of bang for your buck and decent riding characteristics.
Value is an interesting concept with EBIKES anyway, as part of me thinks that you are to go in several thousand deep on the purchase of one, you may as-well spend a bit more to get the right one, than end up spending a bit less, but still a horrific amount of money to get something not quite right that you regret.
Some people are scraping the bottom of the barrel, so every advantage in the market needs to be exploited.