Motors · Shimano
Shimano · STEPS E6100 (DU-E6100)

STEPS E6100

Shimano's 2018 city-and-trekking STEPS unit: 60Nm, 250W rated and a claimed ~500W peak in a 2.8kg casing, with up to 300% assist. Capable, quiet and frugal for commuting and light trails, but never intended as an eMTB motor.

STEPS E6100 eMTB motor
The STEPS E6100 drive unit — compact, alloy-cased and tucked into the same mount as the sportier E8000. (Velomotion / Michael Faiß)
0250500406080100120500 Wcadence (rpm) →power (W)

Claim-based representative shape, NOT a measured dyno trace: a firm pull from low cadence up to the claimed ~500W peak, then a steady taper as rpm climbs. No independent dyno exists for this motor and Shimano publishes no power-cadence plot, so the exact cadence at which power peaks is not known — read the shape, not a specific rpm.

The verdict

Shimano STEPS E6100 was Shimano's volume mid-drive for the masses: the trekking and city motor that sat below the sporty E8000 in the 2018 line-up. The numbers are modest by today's standards — 60Nm of torque, 250W rated and a claimed peak of around 500W, with a maximum support ratio of 300% in Boost (High) mode — but they were tuned for hauling a 22-24kg utility bike up everyday gradients rather than launching out of switchbacks. On that brief it delivers: testers found double-figure climbs trivial on a standard city build, with assist that arrives smoothly and matches rider input naturally rather than shoving.

The headline of the E6100 over the old E6000 it replaced was efficiency. Shimano claimed a 20% efficiency gain for the new casing, which the company says translates into roughly 20% more range from the same battery — its own example being a 50km bike becoming a 60km bike. That figure is a manufacturer claim rather than an independently measured result, so treat it as a direction of travel rather than a guaranteed number; on Shimano's own STEPS packs it means a 418Wh battery doing nearer the work of the old 504Wh, give or take, in matched conditions. It is also notably quieter than its predecessor, dropping to a near-silent whir in Eco and only developing a mild whine in Boost. At 2.8kg it shed 210g over the E6000 and tucked into the same mount as the E8000, so frame designers got a lighter, more efficient unit for free.

The compromises are exactly what you would expect from a city motor pressed into light off-road duty. Power tapers as cadence climbs and the assist cut at 25km/h is a touch abrupt despite STEPS' graduated drop-off. There is no independent dyno trace for the E6100 — it predates the bench-test era and was never a performance unit — so the power-cadence curve here is a representative shape built from Shimano's claimed figures, not a measured plot, and no specific cadence-of-peak should be read into it. Anyone wanting Shimano eMTB drive should look to the EP8/EP801 or the EP6 that superseded this; the E6100 is a commuter's motor that happens to handle a gravel path with composure.

“A commuter's motor with manners: quiet, frugal and unflustered — just don't mistake it for an eMTB unit.”

Character

Rider input
Three modes (Eco/Trail/Boost, also labelled Eco/Normal/High). Shimano quotes a maximum support ratio of 300% in Boost/High — the motor adds up to roughly three times the rider's own input — stepping down through Normal to a gentle, battery-sparing Eco. The mid-drive's torque sensing matches input well and gives a natural, proportional surge rather than a fixed shove, and the ratio can be tuned in E-TUBE between Comfort and Sportive profiles.
On the trail
Smooth, natural and proportional — supportive without feeling artificial, with no drivetrain drag when the motor is off so it rolls cleanly above 25km/h.
Noise
Near-silent whir in Eco, rising to a mild whine under load in Boost — a clear improvement over the audibly humming E6000 it replaced. No independent dBA measurement has been published for the E6100, so the figure here is left blank rather than guessed; subjectively it sits among the quieter city mid-drives and is unobtrusive at commuting pace.
Efficiency
Shimano claims the E6100 is ~20% more efficient than the E6000, which it says is worth roughly 20% more range from the same battery (its own example: a 50km bike becoming ~60km). This is a manufacturer figure, not an independently verified test result.

The case for and against

Strengths

  • Light at 2.8kg (210g lighter than the E6000)
  • Notably quieter than its predecessor
  • Up to 300% assist in Boost — strong enough for everyday city/trekking gradients
  • Claimed ~20% efficiency / range gain (manufacturer figure)
  • Natural, well-matched torque-sensing assist
  • No drag with the motor off

Compromises

  • Only 60Nm / ~500W claimed peak — a tier below eMTB-grade drives
  • Slightly abrupt assist cut at 25km/h
  • Power tapers as cadence rises
  • Non-serviceable; warranty-replace at this tier
  • No independent dyno or noise measurement exists — specs are manufacturer-claimed

How it stacks up

In its own city/trekking tier the E6100 lines up against Bosch's Performance Line Cruise (65Nm, up to 300% assist) and Yamaha's PW-ST (70Nm, 250W, four modes): all three share the same 25km/h, 250W-rated brief and a 300%-ish support ratio, with the Shimano the lightest of the group at 2.8kg and the Yamaha holding a small torque edge. It also sits on a par with, or just above, Bosch's lower Active Line Plus (50Nm). What none of them are is a performance drive — the Bosch Performance Line CX (85Nm), Shimano's own EP8/EP801 (85Nm) and Specialized's 2.x units are a clear tier up. Within Shimano's range the E6100 is the lighter-duty sibling to the eMTB-focused E8000/EP801, and was itself superseded by the EP6.
OWNER INTELLIGENCE
Most owners report no problems — 7,377 posts from 870 members analysed.
66E010 / W013 torque-sensor death - the write-off that defined the E8000 era · typical onset: Scattered from 90 miles to 6,500 km; the dense cluster is 800-2,500 miles / 1,200-4,000…
48Main axle / BB bearing failure and crank-axle play - the E8000's signature wear · typical onset: Usage-dependent more than mileage-dependent: 800-1,000 miles for hard riders, ~1,400 km…
40Water: connector-bay corrosion (common) vs water inside the motor (rarer than reputed) · typical onset: Seasonal (wet winters, jet-washing, heavy-rain rides) rather than mileage-based.
30,000 km and 23,000 km on two E8000s, zero problems, by the forum's highest-mileage Shimano owner - who still bought a backup drive unit from an independent…
Read the full owner report →
Back
Top