Motors · Specialized
Specialized · Turbo Full Power (Levo Gen 2)

2.1

The Specialized 2.1 is Brose's Drive S Mag in Turbo livery — the belt-driven motor that powered the 2019-2021 Levo Gen 2 and Kenevo. Quiet, smooth and surprisingly elastic, it traded outright punch for the most refined power delivery of its generation.

2.1 eMTB motor
The Brose Drive S Mag with its magnesium housing — the unit Specialized badged as the 2.1.
0250500406080100120575 Wcadence (rpm) →power (W)

Brose-typical flat and elastic — chain power at a steady ~100 W rider input builds early and holds high right across the cadence band, with no sharp peak or low-rpm dead spot.

The verdict

Specialized 2.1 is Specialized's badge for the Brose Drive S Mag, the magnesium-housed, carbon-belt mid-drive that defined the Turbo Levo Gen 2 era. Specialized's own figures are 90 Nm, a 560 W mechanical peak and 410% (4×) maximum assist from a 250 W-rated, 36 V unit. On the bench it behaves less like a peaky sprinter and more like a flywheel: feed in roughly 100 W of rider input and Velomotion measured around 575 W back at the chain, held smoothly whether you spin or grind (its absolute ceiling under maximum load runs higher, but the 100 W-input figure is the honest real-world number).

What set it apart in 2019-2021 was refinement rather than raw numbers. The belt drive makes it the quietest motor in its power class — a low, constant whirr with none of the freewheel rattle of geared rivals, and the calmest descender of its generation. Velomotion's bench found it among the most efficient drives on the flat, slipping only to the Bosch CX on steep climbs, and BikeRadar's group test reached the same verdict: natural, progressive delivery with a clear optimum support window. The flat torque curve across 60-90 rpm is its signature — no dead spots low down, no fade up high.

Sustained-climb behaviour is where the belt, not the silicon, is the limiter. The magnesium housing sheds heat well and no independent test recorded a thermal de-rate, so it holds its claimed output on long fire-road grinds rather than tapering like an over-stressed geared motor. But the carbon belt is heat- and load-sensitive: the 2020 firmware update deliberately capped peak torque events on long, hard efforts precisely to keep belt temperatures and strain down. In practice it rewards a steady, moderate cadence on sustained climbs over repeated full-power stamps.

The asterisk is durability. The 2019-2020 belts were the Achilles heel — failures often meant a full motor swap, since Brose belts aren't user-serviceable. That 2020 firmware update eased peak belt loads, reinforced belts shipped from late 2020, and Specialized extended the warranty from two to four years on affected bikes. Buy a used Levo Gen 2 on this motor and the first question is belt service history, not power.

“Not the loudest or the strongest — just the smoothest, quietest mid-drive of its day.”

Character

Rider input
Specialized publishes up to 410% (4×) maximum assist. It rewards steady, moderate input — around 100 W from the rider unlocks near-peak output without needing to hammer. Eco / Trail / Turbo ramps and peak-power % are individually tunable in the Mission Control app.
On the trail
Refined and unobtrusive: smooth, linear power with a flat torque curve that never spikes or sags, a clear optimum support window around 60-90 rpm, and the hush of a belt drive that makes geared rivals sound coarse by comparison.
Noise
No lab dB figure is published, but it is consistently rated the quietest motor in its performance class — a low, constant belt-driven whirr under load with almost no pitch variation, and effectively silent on descents (no rattle, no freewheel knock). BikeRadar notes the constant pitch makes the whine far easier to tune out than the Shimano EP8 or Yamaha units of the day.
Efficiency
Among the most efficient drives on the flat in Velomotion's bench test, slipping behind only the Bosch CX on steep 10% climbs. Real-world that translates to 2,000 m-plus of climbing on a single charge with the larger pack, though it is not quite as frugal as the Shimano EP8.

The case for and against

Strengths

  • Quietest motor in its class — belt drive, constant pitch, no rattle
  • Flat, elastic power across 60-90 rpm with no dead spots
  • Most chain power at a steady 100 W input of its peer group (575 W vs Bosch CX / EP8)
  • Holds power on sustained climbs — no measured thermal de-rate
  • Very efficient on flat terrain; 2,000 m-plus climbing on the 700 Wh pack
  • Smooth, natural delivery, fully tunable via Mission Control
  • Light magnesium housing (2.9 kg Velomotion bench; Specialized quote 3.0 kg)

Compromises

  • 2019-2020 belt durability issues — failures often meant a full motor swap
  • Lower absolute peak ceiling for short surges than the Bosch CX
  • Less outright torque/power than later Specialized 2.2 and 3.1 motors
  • Belt is heat/load-sensitive — 2020 firmware capped peak torque on hard efforts
  • Dealer-only servicing via Brose Servicetool
  • Now discontinued, superseded by the Specialized 3.1

How it stacks up

In measured chain power it sits in the upper midfield, in the same league as the contemporary Bosch Performance CX while being noticeably quieter and smoother. Velomotion's bench shows why the feel differs from the headline numbers: at a steady 100 W rider input the Brose actually puts the most power back to the chain of the three, but the Bosch holds a higher absolute ceiling for short, hard surges — so the Brose feels stronger when you're spinning steadily, the Bosch when you stamp. It out-refines the Shimano EP8 and Yamaha units of its day on noise and delivery, but cedes outright climbing efficiency to the Bosch CX and lacks the headline torque of the later Specialized 2.2 and 3.1 that superseded it.
OWNER INTELLIGENCE
Most owners report no problems · 11,593 posts from 1,506 members analysed.
176Water ingress: left crank bearing, needle roller bearing ('stiff cranks'), connector corrosion · typical onset: Seasonal (UK winters) rather than mileage-based; stiff-cranks-backwards is the canonical…
132Serial replacement loops - the multi-motor owners · typical onset: Replacement motors failing at similar or shorter intervals than originals - strongly…
107Sprag clutch bearing failure (the misdiagnosed twin of the belt story) · typical onset: 250-450 miles in the worst serial case; ~8,000 km for an original sprag on a well-kept…
10,000 km on a 2019-bought Levo Brose, still intact - while all 5 Bosch motors in the same riding group (also 2019 bikes) had been replaced for bearing…
Read the full owner report →

Bikes running this motor · 1

Back
Top