As you re-quoted me directly on this. For the sake of comparison. I have actually now ridden one of the new Yeti's, I don't own one, so no confirmation bias. I would agree, comparing to the Gen 2 Levo, it's an improvement. But then you are comparing a brand new bike to a one that's nearly 4 years old now, in a rapidly evolving sector.
Comparing to other current bikes, is it better than the current Gen 3 Levo? No, but it's very similar, albeit with the usual EP8 disappointment (poor BMS & weak/loud motor). The Decoy MX is a better & faster descending bike than both. The Kenevo SL is noticeably quicker again, but what you gain on the downs you lose on the ups.
Warranty wise, I literally have nothing positive to say about Yeti. Multiple QC issues with bikes & multiple broken frames, in a short period of time. The concept of having something that has an increased liability of failure over a normal bike would introduce a 'Falling Down' moment for me.
Price is of course subjective. For some it is a big consideration, for others less so & for some fortunate people, it isn't. However a bike that is literally double the price of others, with comparable specifications & no better performance, isn't in the realms of consideration, it's just weird. I don't just include Yeti in that statement - Pivot are probably an even worse example of losing the plot.
Prices of halo products are always expensive. But when your halo product is 25% more expensive than a Levo Pro, with a worse spec, then regardless, it's just poor value. And that doesn't matter how much money you have, you are being taken for a ride.
But, if you like it, that's all that matters