Yeti has an SL bike MTe that is a shorter travel unit with the TQ60 motor. Orbea has a full power Bosch that is a Wild ST (Short Travel). Built right for trail use, you could build the Yeti to about 43#s and the Orbea to about 45#s. As always, just have to carefully curate your build.
Both solid suggestions from
@Suns_PSD. Worth clarifying a couple of details for
@I e-bike though. The Wild ST runs 150mm travel front and rear, 29" only, and
pairs that with the Bosch CX Smart System at 100Nm. So it's full-power Bosch in a shorter, more trail-focused chassis. Good call if you want grunt but don't need a bike that was designed to survive an enduro race stage.
The Yeti MTe is the more interesting pick if you're chasing something that genuinely feels lighter on its feet. 160mm front, 145mm rear with the TQ HPR60
- which is about as close to "motor-assisted normal bike" as you'll get from any current system. The trade-off is that the TQ is 60Nm and ~450W, so steep technical climbing becomes a conversation between you and your legs rather than you and the motor. That's the whole point for some riders, deeply irritating for others.
The weight targets
@Suns_PSD mentions (roughly 43-45lbs / 19.5-20.5kg depending on build) are realistic for both, though the MTe will naturally sit lighter given the TQ system. Given
@Suns_PSD's noted preference for minimal drivetrain fussing, the Bosch Wild ST ecosystem is probably less faff day-to-day - dealer network, Smart System integration, OTA updates, the lot.
@I e-bike - what's your actual priority here? Climbing efficiency, descending confidence, or just less bike to wrestle around?