you'll love it.
Levo Gen 2 Levo vs Levo sl dilemma please help
- Thread starter chrismechmaster
- Start date
you'll love it.
This. ^^
Im in camp “both”. Im on the ff and after a month of riding daily i dropped my eco settings to 20/20. Most the trails i ride are tight rough single track. I ride for fun yes, but also to workout. Riding the same trails with an analog bike is much more difficult with more stops due to my recent reintroduction to biking and lacking the balance and endurance. Getting to the point... after a little training i just dont need the power available on the ff for the vast majority of the riding i do, but if i change terrain and want to keep the speed up, its nice to have the option of the ff. Secondly, im planning to buy a second bike (s-works sl ) for riding with others. Its easier to convince someone to drop 5-10k on an ebike after they have ridden one, and i want to build a riding group. As happy as i am with the turbo levo comp, in hindsight, i would have just went straight to the s-works sl. Im not going to look back on my purchase regretting the bike came with the top of the line equipment and can outperform me.
chrismechmaster
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #34
I hope so mate
I love the forks you recommend me too cheers
I have gone for carbon comp tho just hope it’s the right choice my Full fat Levo is alloy
I have a Kenevo, and I’m 262lbs with a knee injury that I’m rehabbing. I ride 90% of the time in ECO which I’ve custom tuned to 20% support, which is still much faster than anyone on a muscle bike. I was very close to going SL, but at my weight, I wanted the stiffer fork and wheels. The Kenevo is a blast, but it’s way more powerful than I need. For a fit rider, I think the SL is gonna be ideal, unless your buddies all ride ebikes. The other thing is the SL is a bit more passable as a non-ebike, which would be nice as there sure are a lot of people who hate ebikes. I think it’s the people passing them on technical climbs at 16mph on ebikes that burns them.
Swissrider
Well-known member
It does depend on where you ride as well. I think I would struggle where I live, in the Alps on an SL, certainly keeping up with my mates. I ride a 2018 Kenevo, which is more like the present Levo. I found the original eco setting of 20% useless - felt like no assistance at all. I raised this to 30% and find it fine on the flat or slight uphill. I used to use Turbo quite a lot - too much probably, for fitness and battery life, so I raised trail to 60% and now find that I can use this most of the time, only using Turbo for very steep sections. So, it’s definitely worth while experimenting.
johnscioscia
Member
Ride wrap it. Good more time and if you don't fall in love with it sell it you won't lose much money at all you'll have the protection from the ride wrap
the carbon frame will feel no different. carbon Wheels do.
Essex turbo rider
Member
Suggest tweaking your settings in your Mission Control.
chrismechmaster
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #40
Is the carbon frame more temperament that the alloy version ?
temperamental? I love mine. I've got carbon wheels and carbon bars too so it's super stiff, rolls and tracks well and overall give lovely feedback
chrismechmaster
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #42
Not the best choices of words sorry , I meant is there any concerns of the carbon frames failing or cracking ? With a alloy I suppose they can dent / bents
Glad I have gone carbon for the extra lightness and stiffness the bike will be looked after well anyway not abused
KeithR
Well-known member
Not specific to Specialized, and acknowledging that alloy frames can fail too - especially at welds - it's a simple, well-documented fact that carbon fibre can fail catastrophically without any prior indication of a problem, in a way which isn't true of alloy.
Not a characteristic I look for in a frame material.
Not a characteristic I look for in a frame material.
it won't creak. You'd have to crash it hard into rocks or a tree to crack it... if you ask me. It's not a concern I have.
Actually.. Carbon frames do have a habit of amplifying sounds, particularly creaks. So in comparison to an Alu frame it may well "creak" more.
Sounds to me like the OP probably shouldn't have sold their normal bike quite so hastily.
I love riding Eebs as much as most but they're still no substitute for a normal bike.
Sounds to me like the OP probably shouldn't have sold their normal bike quite so hastily.
I love riding Eebs as much as most but they're still no substitute for a normal bike.
CjP
PRIME TIME
I on the otherhand have no desire to ride an un assisted bike ever again. Well, Dh bikes excluded, they’re still cool.
Have you ridden the lightweight Eeebs yet Gary?
jmulvaney
Member
Back to the the op. I sold my FF Levo as soon as I heard about the SL. Bought the SL Expert for all the reasons in the OP. Never looked back. I ride the bike over 50% of the time without the power even turned on. I find the bike offers best of both worlds between E and analogue.
Norcalsl
Active member
@jmulvaney Agreed.
Paul willis
Member
I have levo and a creo both chipped and love them both what you need to do is go into tune on the app and have a fiddle I have them both the same and they are great this is my ride yesterday on the levo on the road
you might as well remove the battery and save weight too.
brizi2003
Active member
@apac I've tried to get my head around the reasons why I'd want a Levo SL and don't really get it. I ride a Kenevo and although its heavy and has more power than I need in most riding situations I've found it very adaptable to different riding situations. So either use that power and have a blast which isn't possible on an analogue bike or eek out the power for a long day out. The SL seems to compromise both of those situations. And although the SL is lighter its not a massive difference when total rider+bike weight is considered. I still also enjoy riding my 11kg analogue bike which provides a completely different ride to an ebike. If you said I could have an ebike that weighed the same as an analogue bike, but had a battery capacity that went as far as a full fat bike (with the same rider effort as required on a full fat) then I'd see the point but can't help feeling the SL comes up short here. (i.e. it can go as far as a full fat but requires more rider effort - a bit like an analogue?) I guess what I can't really understand is: what does the SL offer that a full fat ebike doesn't? If it boils down to it's lighter, handles better and needs more rider effort to go as fast/far then surely an analogue bike is even better? What am I missing?
chrismechmaster
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #54
The reasons I have brought one is I like the fact when I demo one that I could ride it like a Normal bike and keep my fitness up but when I needed assistant I could just turn it on for help
Also if I wanted to do a epic all day ride I can by using the battery only when I needed to or if I got fed up off peddling
or buy a few range extenders to carry which means I can go even further for hours
I still have my ff Levo and love It but it can’t do any of this above with that bike
Also if I wanted to do a epic all day ride I can by using the battery only when I needed to or if I got fed up off peddling
or buy a few range extenders to carry which means I can go even further for hours
I still have my ff Levo and love It but it can’t do any of this above with that bike
how far have you ridden an SL?
my SL is nearly 6kg lighter than my ff. that's like carrying 10 u.k pints of water
Rich the gasman
E*POWAH Master
I’ve had both for nearly a year each and I’ll try give my honest view.
the FF - had the expert and upgraded most parts to what I wanted, lyrics, ohlins coil, carbon wheels etc. First few month it was the best thing since sliced bread. Mainly used trail, did a few races on some serious steep tracks ( google kidland dh ) and really started to notice the weight. Never really had battery anxiety, did multiple Lake District days, ride the golfie a lot which is where I was tired from pedalling a normal I was now very tired from descending on the heavy bike. I always longed for a certain feeling, maybe it was the “ effort and reward feeling”. When I started going wrong, after it’s 3rd motor I just fell out with it and warranty was only 2 years then, can’t be driving 100 Mile for a bike not to work. so I went back to a normal bike .
thats lasted a few month as tried a SL and wanted it. Bought my carbon comp and changed all parts to what I wanted. For me personally I like the SL power, it’s not to much but where it shines for me is going DH, the weight and agility out ways the power of a FF. I’ve found I’m fitter since getting the SL and I notice that when riding my mega tower. Can ride with ff mates but they need to be in eco for me to keep up over long fire roads. Both Are great and I guess it’s more of what you want and what type of riding you do.
good luck in what you decide.
the FF - had the expert and upgraded most parts to what I wanted, lyrics, ohlins coil, carbon wheels etc. First few month it was the best thing since sliced bread. Mainly used trail, did a few races on some serious steep tracks ( google kidland dh ) and really started to notice the weight. Never really had battery anxiety, did multiple Lake District days, ride the golfie a lot which is where I was tired from pedalling a normal I was now very tired from descending on the heavy bike. I always longed for a certain feeling, maybe it was the “ effort and reward feeling”. When I started going wrong, after it’s 3rd motor I just fell out with it and warranty was only 2 years then, can’t be driving 100 Mile for a bike not to work. so I went back to a normal bike .
thats lasted a few month as tried a SL and wanted it. Bought my carbon comp and changed all parts to what I wanted. For me personally I like the SL power, it’s not to much but where it shines for me is going DH, the weight and agility out ways the power of a FF. I’ve found I’m fitter since getting the SL and I notice that when riding my mega tower. Can ride with ff mates but they need to be in eco for me to keep up over long fire roads. Both Are great and I guess it’s more of what you want and what type of riding you do.
good luck in what you decide.
brizi2003
Active member
@apac I've never ridden an SL. I just don't get it. But to pick up on your point..I'm 70kg, but with my riding gear and backpack/water nearer 80kg. So if I probably just leave my backpack at home I'd save at least 6kg, so that doesn't sound like much of a saving. But if I take my analogue instead of my ebike I'll save 14kg. Surely it isn't just about weight? Maybe I need to try one.
as Always it depends what you want from the bike. I just find the SL compared to the ff a much more fun ride due to it being lighter but i do confess that my ff was all alloy and the SL is all carbon which I think makes it even more responsive and agile. Its horses for courses. I'm not here to argue which is better. I just prefer the lighter bike. For me I can now bunny hop, flick, wheelie, and get quicker General response from it. With my ff the amount of effort to do those fore mentioned things wasn't worth it.
KeithR
Well-known member
The "right" amount of power from an ebike is an arbitrary, subjective, personal matter: for those of us who ride SLs, that's the "right" amount of power.
It's really that simple.
Is it a compromise? Yes. But everything - FF, acoustic, in-between - is.
Put it this way: I also own a FF Cube and a fast, nimble, flickable acoustic bike. And I've not ridden either - not once - since I got my SL in August.
The SL allows me to do things I can't really do on my acoustic; and it does so in a way which is far more "acoustic-like" than my FF could ever hope to be. The extra effort involved cf. a FF bike is part of the experience, incidentally.
As compromises go then, it's a pretty good one.
Now, I'm more of a trail/singletrack rider than an enduro-type rider: the SL gets me out further, and lets me have far more fun, than either of my other bikes can get close to doing - each can do part of the equation, but only the SL does both.
Last edited:
I bought the ff without riding a bike regularly for at about 25 years. So i didnt have a great idea of what i was really trying to achieve with a ebike apart from fun. Since i hadnt rode for so long I was concerned about riding to far and being to tired to get back ( thats a theme in my life, fear of getting stuck)Since then, my confidence has increased and it became clear that i ride to enjoy a workout and the safety net of the assistance encorages me to go farther . I also learned that the way i ride burns about 10% of the battery per hr. I mostly ride tight slower trails that are about a mile from my home. I use 50-100% assistance to get there and back, and on the trails mostly switch between no assist and eco set at 20/20, using trail mode for steep and rooted climbs. IMO the ff is easily ridable with no assist at lower speeds. Im looking forward to the experience that will come with the sl, as that will fit a different type of riding very well. The power of the ff is overkill for 95% of the riding i do, but that 5 percent, its nice to have when i want it. Different strokes/different folks- its great to have options.
Similar Threads
-
Levo Gen 4 I will trade my Levo 4 for yours Levo R - S5 size
- Started by erider1
- Replies: 3
-
-
-
Levo Gen 4 Levo EVO Rumor Thread – Longer Travel Levo Coming?- Started by rydeezie
- Replies: 166
-