@irie I am puzzled by the tone of your last post (#44), so I took the time to review the whole thread.
We appear to agree about suspension because you liked my post #28 on the topic. So it's just tyre pressures.
In your post #29 you quote me from that post (#28) and then list some front and rear tyre specs. I had come to this directly from the alerts notification and I assumed that these were your tyres and that you were asking me for tyre pressures.
My immediate response was to you and it turned up in Post#38, I hadn’t read any intervening posts at that time.
It is then when it started to go wrong. Your post #39 was a bit testy and caught me by surprise, why so hostile? Anyway, it concluded with “Perhaps you would care to suggest a 'reasonable' level which would be helpful to
@EmtbChar? Thanks”
It was at this point that I realised we were at cross purposes.
But I now note that you hadn’t suggested a reasonable level to her by this time, other than “Never underestimate the influence of tyre pressure, tyres are an important part of the suspension. Too high pressures can make the front and back ends bouncy as hell. Dropped 2psi out of my tyres, wow what a difference”. (Your post#16)
We then disagreed over whether the PinkBike article on tyre pressure was a technical article or not.
Then you posted #44 where you revealed that you knew what EmtbChar was thinking.
"
@EmtbChar doesn't need revelations, all she wants is 'reasonable' tyre pressures to start with after setting fork sag. She is 5'2"/162 lb."
At that point, after 43 previous posts, you finally give her your recommendation.
"25psi will do to start with, after that she can experiment further".
What I am unclear about is why you are upset with me for not doing what you hadn’t done either, ie give reasonable tyre pressures to
@EmtbChar. I have just looked through every post and
she never asked for tyre pressures, although I have noticed that in the last 9 mins she posted that she had looked up a SRAM recco. Post #45