Search results for query: *

Here is the Geometry for the Orbea Wild Mullet Large in the Low flip chip setting. Please calculate the geometry changes going to a 180 fork in this low flip chip setting. Wheelbase - 1287.74mm Bottom Bracket - 345.5mm Head tube angle - 63.08 Reach - 477.02mm Stack - 649.34mm

I've ordered the Wild LT M-Team Mullet in Large. Here is the geometry for the Mullet in Large with a 170 fork in the High flip chip setting. Below are the geometry categories I would like to see how they change with a 180 fork. Wheelbase - 1288.03mm Bottom bracket height - 351.8mm Head tube...

Greg, show me the geometry changes to a 2027 Orbea Wild Mullet going from a 170 to a 180 travel fork. Specifically head angle, wheelbase and bottom bracket height.

Is it true Orbea ships their batteries with zero % charge?

I bought a new Gen 0 360 watt internal battery for my 21 Orbea Rise. I estimate my current internal battery has lost 20% range in 4.5 years. I was planning to use the current internal battery for a few more months before I install the new. Is there any risk to not installing the new battery...

Can you give me an estimate for the weight of the 2026 Treks Slash+ 9.9 in large?

How does the 2026 Trek Slash+ 9.9 in medium weigh two pounds more than the 2025 Trek Slash+ 9.9 in medium? The only difference I see is the TQ60 on the 2026 Trek Slash+ and the TQ50 on the 2025 Trek Slash+. 2025 Trek Slash 9.9 in medium - 20.88 Kg/46.04 pounds. 2026 Trek Slash 9.9 in medium -...

What would the wheelbase be with the mullet link on a Trek Fuel+ LX? These are the two options I am considering from the Trek website, This is using the 29er shock mount with mullet link, bottom bracket 344.8mm, head angle 63.3. This is using the 27.5 shock mount with the mullet link, bottom...

Can you compare and analize the Shimano EP8RS used on the 21 Orbea Rise to the new TQ60? Both motors have 60nm max. How would they feel different even though both have 60nm max?

Sorry Greg, the Trek Fuel+ in large stack is 647 not 347 that was a typo.

Trek Fuel+ LX in large wheelbase is 1275 mm not 1260 mm. Bottom bracket should say 347 mm not 338. Stack is 347 mm not 633mm. The Slash in large wheelbase is 1269mm not 1275mm. The Slash chainstay is 434 mm not 440 mm. The Slash bottom bracket is 352 mm not 340 mm.

Good to know the exact geometry on my Kenevo SL mullet. I'm going to replace my Kenevo SL with a new long travel e-bike. I want to get as close as possible to the same geometry as my Kenevo SL mullet. Can you list the long travel ebikes in mullet with the closest geometry to my Kenevo SL...

I've been riding the Kenevo SL in mullet for the last two years. I really love the geometry in mullet. I'm currently using a Schwalbe Magic Mary Gravity Pro 2.75 x 2.5 rear tire. What is the geometry with this rear tire? And what would the geometry be with a Tacky Chan super gravity 2.75 x 2.4?

I have my KSL in the steep head tube setting and the chainstays in the high setting. Greg can you calculate what the geometry is after mullet conversion? Here is the geometry in the steep head tube setting and the high chain stay setting before converting to mullett, Size S4 Stack 634mm...