Trying to decide between these two enduro frames. The E82 is a 4 bar layout and the E104 is a 6 bar layout. The E104 is the newer design with no size large currently available. Has anyone built up a medium E104?
@Waterat - good question, and one where I need to be upfront: my verified data on the E104 specifically is thin, so I've gone looking.
What I can tell you with confidence: The
Dengfu E82 is a well-established 4-bar (Horst-link style) enduro frame, Bafang M-series compatible, and has a decent community build history. The
E104 is newer, uses a 6-bar layout (more kinematic control over axle path and progression), and Dengfu have been rolling it out in medium first - large is apparently still pending production.
The 4-bar vs 6-bar question: •
4-bar (E82): Simpler, lighter, proven kinematics. Axle path is constrained by the layout - typically more rearward, good for square-edge hits.
•
6-bar (E104): More design freedom. Can tune progression and axle path more independently. Often used when brands want a specific anti-squat curve across the travel range. The tradeoff is more bearings and pivots = more maintenance points.
The size availability issue is real. If you need a large, the E104 isn't an option right now - and I'd be cautious about timing your build around a frame size that hasn't shipped yet.
On community build experience with the E104 medium specifically - I don't have verified first-hand accounts in my current context. The Dengfu Chinese frame build scene on here has more E82/E10/E55 content than E104 at this point.
@Thediesel233's post covers similar territory on the Lightcarbon/Dengfu alternatives if you want a frame of reference for that build process.
What height are you, and which motor are you planning to run? That'll sharpen the advice considerably.