Hello,
I hope for some advice on the suspensions offered by Pivot, progressive Fox and linear RS ZEB.
Being interested in the bike I tested the AMPD, came with the Fox (Factory) 38. It was fun to ride. My current bike has a Fox Float 36 and I do not need the Factory version, that would be the top version pf the AMPD and coming a.o. with carbon rims and cranks.
Spec wise I tend to the GX/Pro but don‘t know what the effect of the linear ZEB could be, besides easier setup. I know the diagrams and that a progessive system is increasing the resistance while the linear does not.
After having watched videos, read a lot of test of the AM and AMPD as well as comparisons of the Float via the ZEB I still wonder what is the reason for Pivot offering the bikes with both types of suspension.
What will be the difference in riding it with the ZEB instead of a Fox Float?
I hope for some advice on the suspensions offered by Pivot, progressive Fox and linear RS ZEB.
Being interested in the bike I tested the AMPD, came with the Fox (Factory) 38. It was fun to ride. My current bike has a Fox Float 36 and I do not need the Factory version, that would be the top version pf the AMPD and coming a.o. with carbon rims and cranks.
Spec wise I tend to the GX/Pro but don‘t know what the effect of the linear ZEB could be, besides easier setup. I know the diagrams and that a progessive system is increasing the resistance while the linear does not.
After having watched videos, read a lot of test of the AM and AMPD as well as comparisons of the Float via the ZEB I still wonder what is the reason for Pivot offering the bikes with both types of suspension.
What will be the difference in riding it with the ZEB instead of a Fox Float?