Recent content by Mlok

Nothing will happen; it's stable (It would take quite a lot of force to make it fall; I've never had the slightest problem with it). It's not the entire weight, though it's probably about 80% (20% on the front wheel). And the static load on the engine cover is negligible. The cover must be able...

I have Dragonworks(I am from Czech rep., Dragonworks too -> easier ordering). https://www.dragonworks.cz/stojan-na-elektrokolo/ It is simple very good Maintenance stand (quick and easy mounting on the stand without much lifting), which doesn't take up much space. I use it all the time. It's also...

Measurement for CX4: To call up the maximum output of around 540 watts, almost 180 watts of power are required from the rider. Only difference will be a bit less rider's power requiered for max motor output (around 100W - It won't actually be exactly 600%) for speed up to 15km/h.

But only due to high multiplier on Avinox. And as soon as Bosch receives the next update with 600% multiplier than it will be much less difference even for lower rider inputs.

Disc Discussion on speed limit started on first post on second page (and last posts on first page) this thread. And I didn't come up with that, I was just picking up where the previous discussion left off.

In reality its motor + rider with reasonable rider power input. And for real situation (we are discussing regarding usage due to speed limit 25km/h) you need 200W+ rider power for max motor power (for both motors). That's why you can't ignore those 200W+. 400-500W is unreasonable high power and...

And back to situation on speed limit 25km/h. With M1 and 72kg I am able to reach speed limit on gradient about 15%. With M2S it will be only a bit higher, about 18% (M1: 250W + 950W -> 1200W, M2S: 250W + 1150W -> 1400W).

You are comparing multipliers (For low rider input power, all of this is limited by a motor multiplier). Avinox on max setting has unreasonably large multiplier (I don't use 800% Avinox multiplier). If you dont use that large multiplier than Avinox will have much lower power with riders 50W. And...

Now you are comparing motor multipliers, not motor powers. And yes, Avinox has bigger multiplier (but Bosch will probably have bigger multiplier after next update). But the discussion was about approaching the speed limit (25km/h EU or 32km/h US). You need max motor power for that. In my...

I have Avinox M1 and Brose S-mag. M1 has nearly twice the power of the Brose, so the same situation. And in reality on specific steep uphill: 23-25% (it is not constant): With Brose 8-9km/h, with M1 12-14km/h. There's no way I could be twice as fast on M1. Brose: 250W + 550W -> 800W M1: 250W +...

Its imposible ride without rider power. Without rider power its nonsence. My example is real situation. With Avinox, you'll never be twice as fast.

No, it won't. Measurement: E-Bike Motor Power Test - Who is the strongest? | E-Bike Lab and E-Bike Lab - Unabhängige Prüfstandsdaten Power Bosch: Max power 685W and it needs 220W rider power -> 905W Power Avinox: Max power 1137W (No one will use the boost permanently) and for good comparison...

I don't understand why it's such a problem for them to make a bigger battery, at least for the 1300W variant (with lower max current). Rotwild shows that is not problem - 864Wh battery - 3,58kg: https://www.rotwild.com/en/r-exc I have R.EX (with M1) with the same battery...

Of course not. That's even worse when it creates a market for derestricting. So the idea was that the situation at Avinox was a little better, not worse. By the way, I have derestricted Avinox too, but I've had a VPN subscription for years anyway (thats way I pay nothing for derestricting).

For example, with Bosch, you can use the services of someone who has access to Bosch service software, and that costs you some money. Or, in the past, purchasing a chip also cost money. In both cases, someone else makes money from the derestricting process. With Avinox, the user handles it...