Recent content by ericm

If that doesn't hold it, try anti slip carbon paste.

The Sram is steel. The 38t part number I posted earlier in this thread fit my PL Carbon just fine. It's the 38t version of what came on the bike.

Interesting that mine did not. 29er mode, PL Carbon with shock from a regular PL. I'm pretty sure they are the same length.

I just bolted an Sram 38t to the existing carrier. It clears the frame with no issue. Part # 11.6218.057.002

I didn't think it was. I have built some light race bikes in the past but the Amflow is already pretty heavy. The carbon cranks also have a wider Q factor, and it's already wide due to the motor.

Thanks! With the shipping it's still about the same price that Amflow quoted me before shipping, so I ordered some. I've used 175mm cranks on road and mountain for decades. The BB is really high on the Amflow already so I'm not too concerned about losing 10mm of pedal clearance. I'm used to...

I have a set of Praxis aluminum cranks on my Pro, in 160mm to replace the 155s that it came with. They're fine. The stock cranks have really good heel clearance. Praxis does not have as much. I'm still waiting on Amflow to get some 165s in stock.

My PL Carbons' stock MT7s took forever to bed in. Now that they are they're pretty good. Not quite Maven gold level but totally ok, and less touchy.

I solved this with a Wolf Tooth B-rad mounting base and a side entry cage. I mounted base as low as it will go without touching the frame. The base moves the cage down far enough to get a regular 20oz bottle in. I don't think a 24 will fit. My frame is a Large. The cage I used is a BRKURLEG...

These spindles use the ISIS interface. That has 1 degree tapered splines on the bottom bracket axle. The cranks need to fully bottom on the splines. Otherwise they will be loose and wear out as they move on the splines. Spacers would not only reduce the engagement with the splines but also make...