The Golden Goose. 72v Dengfu E55 CYC X1 Pro.

bram.biesiekierski

Active member
Joined
Apr 18, 2022
Messages
558
Reaction score
331
Location
Perth WA Australia
After owning a Dengfu e22 for a few years, I have decided to build a new bike. I love the e22, but have become accustomed to the power and crave more. When I bought the e22, I wasnt really that concerned with geometry, and just wanted an affordable powerful bike. But after riding it, and listening to the likes of Brian Cahil, I began to realise the bike is actually a really good match for my riding style and feel, and the type of terrain i tend to ride. The e22 is an awesome platform, the long rear end, upright riding posistion and reliable horst link handle the power and ride great at speed, and really compliment the motor combo and make for a great fast trail bike. The frame has been bullet proof reliable, and I am very impressed with the quality of the brand.

Ofcourse the Dengfu e55 was a strong candidate as a replacement. It also has really long chainstays, and on paper looks to have similar charactaristics. With some slight improvements in the way of a larger battery compartment, more upright seatpost and slacker head tube. Which I think are all good improvements, and shouldnt detract from the e22s feel. But, it doesnt really offer much of a performance increase other than 52v instead of 48v.

The Bafang Ultra has been a solid and reliable workhorse, and I have no issues there. But its not exactly optimised for eMTB. More power was a key consideration, and I have had my eye on the CYC X1 progression. Then with the likes of Bonnell bringing the 775mx to market, it cemented it for me that I wanted something along those lines. So that is where the idea to convert a e55 to accept an X1 was born.

I was also very seriously considering a Commencal DH Supreme v5. Because everything I have seen and heard of that bike sounds amazing, and the front triangle has enormous real estate for batteries. Yes, I know the Supreme is not even in the same category as a Dengfu e55, but I feel it would have been a very good candidate for the type of bike I am envisioning. The longer travel would also be greatly appreciated, as I feel the e22/e55 could do with a little more in that departemnt. I dont particularily ride crazy terrain that demands it, but i feel that at decent speed, even small hits make for big compressions and can blow through the limited travel available on the Dengfu frames.

In the end I settled with the Dengfu e55. I like that the brand is not that well known, and I like the process of building a bike up from scratch as opposed to converting what is effectively an already complete bike. I also feel the integrated in-downtube battery is a cleaner look than a strap-on battery pack, even though capacity will be limited at approx 1kwh. I think having smaller shorter duration batteries that can be hot swapped would be better than a bigger longer lasting pack that is more difficult to swap. The choice was also partly to do with the maximum chain ring size. And lastly, by converting a mid drive back to a BSA bottom bracket, and then over to a X1 means i have control over adjusting things like BB drop, F/R balance, because the adapter is a custom component, and i could adjust geo quite easily by altering BB placement.

I purchased a red e55 frame from Dengfu directly, which arrived promptly and looking good. I do like a bit of bling on my bikes and quickly decided a black and gold theme would look great against the red frame. Its also where the bike got its nick name of the Golden Goose. So began a bit of a shopping spree collecting the parts needed. I wanted good quality gear, but also tried to take advantage of any deals / sales that was on offer.

With suspension, I opted for a Cane Creek Kitsuma Coil as one came up for discount. I have one of these on another bike and have always been very happy with the feel, once you figure out the complex setup ofcourse. A yellow 575lb Ohlins spring compliments the colourway I have in mind.

20250903_104440.jpg


As others have found out, the way Dengfu has implemented the shock mount is a bit of an afterthought on the e55. It appears they have cheaped out and used the same bolt as the e22 instead of manufacturing one specifically for the e55. But due to the frame mounting shape, they had to drill quite deeply into the carbon to make it all work. It looks like shi1t, and has very little material to bear the load. I actually bent the shock bolt on my e22, so when I saw the e55 arrangement, I knew right away that was never gonna fly.

I pondered the arrangement and designed a solution that involves using a grade 12.9 precision ground 8mm shoulder bolt, and then turn down 2 tapered aluminium adapters to interface directly with the carbon frame. My lathe skills are quite amaturish, and i wanted something a little better than I could make myself. I had always wanted to learn 3d modelling and this was a good oportunity. So I got On-shape and spent a few nights teaching myself how to use the software, and designed the parts. I sent the files to JLCCNC and had them manufactured from 7075 aluminium and then hardcoat anodized black. They turned out great. Perfect fitment, and installed depth. The shoulder bolt a snug fit and perfect length. I am confident it should handle the heavy spring loads fine.

They are designed to be a slight press fit into the frame. So that way they remain inplace when the bolt is removed for shock removal. I went with a snug fit, as i wanted it all to be very tight fitting into the frame, to prevent movement and reduce wear n tear, and wallowing out of the carbon frame during use. The outside diamter is just a whisker under 15mm at the outside edge of the frame, and it then tapers down to approx 14.8mm, at the inner edge where it then transitions to the 45° bottom taper. This worked out pretty good.

One of the adapters is basically just a fancy washer that sits under the head of the shoulder bolt. It is counterbored so the head sits flush, and profiled to fit into the bore in the carbon frame.

The other adapter is basically a fancy nut, that the shoulder bolt can screw into. It has a 8mm internal bore on the inside face, so the shoulder bolt can insert into it before the threads fully engage. The idea was to allow the shoulder bolt to transfer the loads into the adapter, and not rely entirely on the threads. The outside face of the nut has 2 small holes that i can use a pin wrench / circlip pliers to hold when tightening. Although the press fit into the frame is tight enough that this wasnt needed during instalation.


20251116_143549.jpg


Screenshot_20251211_173811_Onshape.jpg

Screenshot_20251211_173922_Onshape.jpg

1000034288.jpg

1000034278.jpg
1000034281.jpg
20251211_172311.jpg

1000034301.jpg

1000034299.jpg

Front fork I splurged for an Ohlins DH38 m1. I actually got a commencal V5 take-off directly from Commencal at a discounted rate, probably due to the release of the m2. It was still pricey but significantly cheaper than the ticket price elsewhere. A coil conversion was first up, because thats just the sort of guy I am. I ordered a few different grade coils to choose from. I just much prefer the feel of a coil, and Im stubborn and set in my ways. So i didnt even bother with air. Choosing a dual crown wasnt ideal, as the e55 is very wide on the top tube near the head set. That greatly impacts available steering angle. But too late now. Maybe if it gets to bad, ill swap to a single crown, and fit the DH038 onto the e22. I might swap to the biggest offset tripple clamps, that will get a bit more angle by moving the tubes forwards. Ideally id use the shortest offset clamps, as that makes the most stable steering.

20250920_111937.jpg


With the longer than intended fork, and the fact the e55 is already slacker than the e22, I was concerned the front would be ridiculously slack for my liking. Which it would have been. Plus the integrated headset cable routing on the e55 was a major turn-off. So I opted for a 1.5° steeper Works headset kit. And that is where I ran into the second headache. Dengfu headsets measure 56mm top and bottom, which on paper sounds like a common ZS56 arrangement. But the Dengfu cups and frame counter bore is quite shallow. Significantly shorter than the Works components angle headset i had orderd. Thankfully this was actually easily over come by turning down the new headset cups with a large 45° chamfer on the lathe, so they match the shallow counter bore in the frame.

With a bit of careful measurements and some back and forth with Works support, I came to the conclusion the Works cups have enough meat in them to machine, just. Its just a little bit finicky to chuck them up as they are so small, and the dont have concentric faces, IDs or ODs due to the nature of how angle sets work. I pressed the modified cups into the frame and the installed height seemed about right. I think it will hold up over time.

20250916_164605.jpg

1000031915.jpg

20250919_171033.jpg

In order to get away from the headset cable routing, I had to punch some holes into the frame. But where to do it. After much deliberation, i decided to put some small holes into the inside of the triangluar cut-away in the e55 frame. This allows for a relatively staight cable run, aswell as keeps the penetrations out of sight. I got my sharpest step drill and got to work. Then cemented in some rubber grommets. It aint my best work, hopefully hasnt weakened the frame too much.

For the drivetrain I opted for a CYC HD 5spd. I know the X1 Pro doesnt really need gearing. But the ghost pedalling feel sounds absolutely horrible, so I needed something. I blew up a couple of Kindernay IGHs on my e22 before recently swapping to the CYC 5spd, so I figured it would make sense to run both bikes like that. Time will tell how it holds up. Drivetrains is my achilles heel with these bikes. Nothing has been able to reliably handle my abuse yet.

For the wheels I decided to build them up my self. The CYC 5spd kit comes with a rear hub, so I laced that up to the new DT Swiss FR571 using Sapim Strongs and brass Squorx nips. I went 29", as the bike is gonna be fast trail use primarily. Up front another DT FR571, laced to a Spank Hex, again using Sapim Strongs. (Heavy for a front wheel, but strong as anyrhing). Tyres I went tanwall Schwalbe Magic Mary / Big Betty in super gravity orange stripe option. And lastly, swapped over to the gold rim decals.

1000032235.jpg


Brakes I choose to use Formula Cura 4s specifically because of how good they look in gold, and how that would match my colourway. A purely superficial aesthetic choice. I have always used Hope brakes, and i have never had any need to change. But these Formula Curas are sex. I went out on a bit of a limb, as they were unknown to me, and id seen mixed reviews. I did end up frankestein-ing in some Hope hoses, as i didnt like the look of the standard hoses, and i needed the 90° banjos aswell. I also went straight to some Galfer pads. I also choose Hope 220mm rotors too.
IMG-20251011-WA0001.jpeg


Pedals are bronze Spank Oozy. All my bikes have Spank Oozy. I ONLY ever ride Spank Oozy. I did actually buy some Raceface kashmoney Atlas pedals. But my OCD kicked in and I changed my mind and went back to the tried and true Spank Oozy. I think im up to like 5 pairs now.

The rest of the componets i pick and choose primarily based on how they look / personal prefference / brand loyalty. Renthal Fatbars. Ritchy seat. Burgtec for stem, seat clamp, and UDH because of the really nice gold colourway. E13 cranks. PNW dropper. I bought about 3 or 4 sets of grips before i found the right combo of colour, width and feel. I eventually sertled on Raceface Gripplers in Gum colour. I threw in a few gold highlights aswell like valve stems, rotor bolts etc. Dropper remote is a Aliexpress unit. Things like gold cable sheaths etc also sourced on Aliexpress.

20250920_163121.jpg


The battery was the next big hurdle. The X1 Pros really sing with 72v. But jamming 72v into the Dengfu e55 battery case isnt exactly an easy feet. For me, maintaining the quick swap functionality of a removable in-downtube battery was a must. That way I can have a couple of batteries and swap when needed. The standard e55 battery case is a Reention Rhino case. These are typically made to 52v, 14s4p, but can hold a maximum of 60 x 21700 cells, but that doesnt leave any space for a BMS. In order to hit 20s / 72v and have enough instantaneous power and capaicty to be somewhat usefull, I need to use all 60 cells, arranged 20s3p, and use some high capacity / high instantaneous output cells like molicel p45 or Samsung 50s. And Id still need a decent BMS jammed in there aswell, around 80a capable to achieve a theoretical 5kw peak.

In order to achieve this 20s3p and still fit a BMS inside the Rhino case, I had to get really creative with the cell placement. The standard cell scaffold in the case is not optimised, the cell holes are quite large, and the cell pitch isnt that tight either. Plus there is alot of wasted space along the edges. I spent alot of nights re-designing a cell scaffold to fit the case, that would allow all 60 cells and an 80a slimline Jiabaida (JBD) BMS. I managed to do this by bunching the cells up, utilising all the vertical height at one end of the pack and stagering it, then at the other end of the pack, flattening the layout out, and using the full length available to squeeze a BMS ontop. I was splitting millimeters, and literally using every one available to me. It took me alot of time, many revisions and a crash course in On-Shape to get the design hammered out.

The cell scaffold is currently getting CNC cut from POM plastic by JLCCNC. I dont really know whats better between 3d printing and CNC machining, but in my mind, CNC seemed like the better option. They could achieve minimum wall thickness of 0.8mm, and i opted for a cell hole diameter of 21.2mm, resulting in a primary pitch of 22mm. Just enough to fit it all in.

The Rhino case is at minimum 73.7mm wide, which really doesnt leave much room for a 70mm+ cell and the cell interconnects and insulation. So I am sourcing some custom copper bussbars to be made. I couldnt use off the shelf bussbars as my cell pitch changes as ive massaged the placement in order to cram everything in.

1000034308.jpg

1000034310.jpg

1000034314.jpg

1000034312.jpg


As for the motor mounting arrangement. I have began fabricating this myself. Basically 2 piece of 5mm steel, cut and drilled to match the m620 mounting bolt pattern, and then an off the shelf BSA bottom bracket shell. As much material removed from the plates to reduce excess weight. And then welded together with some spacer tubes between the bolt holes.

But the more i play around with 3d modelling, im pretty confident i could design something alot more professional, and have it sent off for CNC machining like the reat of the custom components. I will probably end up doing this.

Weight isnt really a concern for me. I just something i can beat up on over and over and not fail. So the heavy / meaty components are a must, at the expense of a little extra baggage.

Keep posted for more buid progress as it develops. The build is a slow burn, as with a 50hr work week, and 2 kids, I do not have much excess time for this project.
 
⚡ EMTB Pro Go Pro — exclusive discounts & ad-free Peaty's 25% off & more · Ad-free browsing · Pro badge See the deals →
Very cool project, would never have thought of mounting a CYC "bb-motor" in an e-bike frame
 
I look forward to reading more about the build. I recognize you from the E22 threads, I personally thought a lot about building something similar with the E22 and later E55, 72v but with the M620 modified. But at the time I decided to hold off due to cost, ultimately ending up with a electric dirt bike this year. It's cool to see someone do something similar that never left the "what if" phase for me.

These are typically made to 52v, 14s4p, but can hold a maximum of 60 x 21700 cells, but that doesn't leave any space for a BMS. In order to hit 20s / 72v and have enough instantaneous power and capacity to be somewhat useful, I need to use all 60 cells, arranged 20s3p, and use some high capacity / high instantaneous output cells like molicel p45 or Samsung 50s. And Id still need a decent BMS jammed in there as well, around 80a capable to achieve a theoretical 5kw peak.

I HIGHLY suggest you look into newer modern cells. The Molicel P45B and Samsung 50S had their place a few years ago, but new tech "tabless" cells put both to shame. I know that CYC motor can be very amp hungry, peaking at 6kw. High performing tabless cells which will heat up less and have less voltage sag, and great cycle life and are cheaper than a cell like the Molicel P50B while performing better in every way.

At the time of writing you have 3 options for tabless 5ah 21700's. The EVE 50PL, Tenpower 50XG, and Reliance RS50. My links are to a trusted independent tester "Mooch" reports if you want to read more into them. IMO If price and availability isn't a issue, the reliance RS50 is probably the one you want due to it providing the highest capacity of the 3, being in full production now, and the extra discharge performance not needed.

Now if life gets in the way and the battery doesn't get built / needed for a few months things might change. Right now a lot of companies have 6ah+ performance cells (tabless from the companies above) in the works. Molicel this year finally officially announced the P60B and M65A, the ladder from what we know would be a great option when it's out. While not tabless and more oriented as a capacity cell, it still would fit you roughly 27.5a peak needs being rated to 26A continuous without overheating. That would be 1400wh, something I'm sure you would appreciate with the CYC X1 Pro.
 
Very cool project, would never have thought of mounting a CYC "bb-motor" in an e-bike frame
Thanks. To me it seams like a clever solution, if you dont mind some custom work. Which any conversion/DIY bike will have to some degree anyways. An e-bike frame has a battery solution ready to go out of the box, but you have to buy or make the motor mount. Where as a conversion MTB you get a drop-in motor, but will usually need some kind of work to make a battey fit.

I look forward to reading more about the build. I recognize you from the E22 threads, I personally thought a lot about building something similar with the E22 and later E55, 72v but with the M620 modified. But at the time I decided to hold off due to cost, ultimately ending up with a electric dirt bike this year. It's cool to see someone do something similar that never left the "what if" phase for me.



I HIGHLY suggest you look into newer modern cells. The Molicel P45B and Samsung 50S had their place a few years ago, but new tech "tabless" cells put both to shame. I know that CYC motor can be very amp hungry, peaking at 6kw. High performing tabless cells which will heat up less and have less voltage sag, and great cycle life and are cheaper than a cell like the Molicel P50B while performing better in every way.

At the time of writing you have 3 options for tabless 5ah 21700's. The EVE 50PL, Tenpower 50XG, and Reliance RS50. My links are to a trusted independent tester "Mooch" reports if you want to read more into them. IMO If price and availability isn't a issue, the reliance RS50 is probably the one you want due to it providing the highest capacity of the 3, being in full production now, and the extra discharge performance not needed.

Now if life gets in the way and the battery doesn't get built / needed for a few months things might change. Right now a lot of companies have 6ah+ performance cells (tabless from the companies above) in the works. Molicel this year finally officially announced the P60B and M65A, the ladder from what we know would be a great option when it's out. While not tabless and more oriented as a capacity cell, it still would fit you roughly 27.5a peak needs being rated to 26A continuous without overheating. That would be 1400wh, something I'm sure you would appreciate with the CYC X1 Pro.
I had heard of tab-less cells, but hadnt given them much thought. But i think i will investigate now. I havent purchased the cells yet. I have bought 3 x Samsung 50s cells from a Australian supplier, just so i could confirm exact size, and cycle test them, try and determine if genuine or faker etc before the main purchase.

Do you know reliable suppliers for any of those tabless cells?
 
I got the X1 Pro a little while ago, I selected the 100mm wide option just to give a little more clearance around the frame if i decided to put the motor part into the main triangle. It should fit in there just. But im pretty happy with how it looks sitting horizontal. I also choose the largest chainring option which is 40t. I think i will need an even larger chainring as I currently have a 40t on the e22 which also has a CYC 5spd, and I feel slightly larger is needed on that bike. So Im pretty sure i will want higher gears on the e55.

I think im going to need to either drop the BB or slightly move it forwards a little as compared to the standard crank location in the m620. I want to be able to run up to a 44t chainring. And im pretty sure the e55 wont fit a chainring that large with the standard crank location.

Next step is to mock up a jig so i can play around with the location and figure that out. Work out exactly where i want the BB compared to the m620. And also work out exacly the side to side alignment / chainline etc. The 3d model above has the BB in the exact same location as the bafang m620. And centered relative to the center of the m620 mounting bolts. I dont think the center of the mounting bolts is the center line of the bike frame. So I will need to determine exactly where i want things to land before i can finalise the 3d model.

Heres a couple pics with the X1 held up in posistion.

1000034476.jpg



1000034475.jpg
 
Last edited:
The battery cell dividers arrived today from JLCCNC. I am very impressed with how they turned out. The fit on the cells is perfect. Snug without needing force to get them in.

The fit into the alluminium case is also pretty good. If anything, its perhaps a little tight, i did need a little extra force to get it in. I only have 3 x 21700 cells on hand to test fit with, and as they entered the enclosure, i could feel the resisteance increase as i was sliding them in.

The BMS pocket also holds the BMS perfectly too. This was the hardest part of the design to get right. Trying to squeeze every spare millimeter from the cell layout to allow for the BMS fitment was a extremely time consuming and very frustrating affair. As it stands now, the heatsink literally slides up against the aluminium enclosure. (I presume this is ok? As in it shouldnt be electrically live?) And the blue B- wires are snug into the slim cavity along the middle of the enclosure wall and the BMS.

There is only 1 error in the manufacturing that i have noticed. One of the 2 holes that i have made for the BMS NTC thermistors is a through hole. Its supposed to be a blind hole. This wont make any tangible difference to the battery. But its not as per designed. They perhaps got mixed up with the BMS balance wire holes that i have incoporated, which are the same diameter (to make manufacturing easier) and perhaps they accidently programed the drill cycle wrong, or from the opposite side operation etc. Its only on one of the 2 cell dividers. So perhaps they caught it in QC and corrected it for the other part.

I only ordered 1 set of dividers initially. I do want to make multiple batteries. But I wanted to make sure my design works before comitting to a larger order. I may make some minor revisions before the next order.

Space is very tight. I have designed around Samsung 50s, but i may now use other cells. And i know that not all 21700s are exactly 21 x 70. I am ok with unwrapping the cells if need be but would prefer not too.

I also test fit a bit of universal 0.3mm copper bussbar. I had to cut it by hand to fit my arrangement. So please ignor that. I am attempting to source custom cut copper bussbars for the final build. But it does sit down below the raised lip i have created. And has enough space for maybe 1mm of insulating material before hitting the battery case. This is probably the biggest worry, a short circuit between bussbars and case could be catastrophic, and these Reention Rhino cases are so tight with side width.


1000034489.jpg


1000034488.jpg



1000034486.jpg



1000034485.jpg



1000034491.jpg



1000034492.jpg


1000034496.jpg
 
Absolutely amazing, this is what I dream of doing with my e55. I've been looking into the modded m620 like innotrace but usually those are only 60 volt, so still require all the work of a new battery but less gain over 52 volts. I'd be happy with any more speed but you are going all the way! What is your backup bike to use in the meantime?
 
Absolutely amazing, this is what I dream of doing with my e55. I've been looking into the modded m620 like innotrace but usually those are only 60 volt, so still require all the work of a new battery but less gain over 52 volts. I'd be happy with any more speed but you are going all the way! What is your backup bike to use in the meantime?
Thanks. I currently have an e22 fully built up, which i freakin love. And i keep an old human powered trek remedy maintained aswell. I feel the need to keep 2 eMTB operational, as i know from experience you are always breaking something. And doesnt matter how much spares you try and keep on hand, its always something that will take 1-2 weeks to arrive. For example, last time i rode the e22 i bent a pedal spindle with a high speed rock strike. Right now riding is pretty miserable as it is approaching mid Australian summer. And where i live gets particularily hot. Getting out at dawn is about the only way. But even then its so dry, the dirt has no grip.

I am a motor head from when i was young. Used to compete a tarmac rally car in amauture level events. And i was forever building that in similar over the top fashion. This is just a slightly cheaper, slightly less time consuming hobby for me to pursue. And allows me to satisfy both my adrenalin fix and my tinkering/building itch aswell.
 
Yeah if you ride them hard it is a waiting game for something to go wrong for sure! I have 3 m620 motors for one bike so I have time to get a backup fixed and not be down when the controller goes out. Although it seems that eggrider default bafang settings were frying my controllers and now it has been more reliable just programming it myself and using a basic display. Is your e22 stock or with an upgraded motor also?
IMG_20251108_131041.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: ncs
Yeah if you ride them hard it is a waiting game for something to go wrong for sure! I have 3 m620 motors for one bike so I have time to get a backup fixed and not be down when the controller goes out. Although it seems that eggrider default bafang settings were frying my controllers and now it has been more reliable just programming it myself and using a basic display. Is your e22 stock or with an upgraded motor also?View attachment 172798
My e22 moror is stock out the box. 48v CAN model. The Dengfu and Bafang stuff has been extremely reliable for me. (Its everything else that I break.) The only issues with Bafang are occoasional random speed sensor faults. Eventually the wiring coming out of my motor started falling apart. So I opened it up and replaced those crappy white wires from the board out of the motor case with some ETFE cable and it has been bullet proof since. Ive crash damaged a few displays. Now i just use the SW102 i think.

With Dengfu e22 frame, like wise its been very reliable. Just minor stuff. Ive bent the shock bolt. Ive had a suspension bearing sieze up. (Just recently replaced them all.) The battery cover lid is just about worn away to nothing where it mounts. One of the motor mounts is pretty well stuffed. Too many off and ons with the motor, and me being rough and over tightening stuff. The motor mount bolts also wore out and have been replaced with 10mm shoulder bolts.

Drivetrain is the area that i suffer the worst. Blown up 2 kindernay IGHs, and 3 various cassete groupsets before them. I have recently changed to CYC 5spd HD gearing. But too early to tell
 
I feel like my head is about to explode. Trying to calculate the offset for the bottom bracket is very difficult. There is the centerline of the frame, which is different to the centerline of the m620 mounting holes in the frame. I believe the mounting holes are centered approx 4mm towards the driveside compared to the frame centerline.

Then there is the refference line which all the CYC X1 measurements are based off. This is ofcourse just an arbritory line and is not center to the mounting BB. Because each variation of CYC BB width option is effectively based off the driveside mounting location. This means each BB centerline is offset differently. Each BB width option also has different pedal Q factor aswell, which also have a different effective centerline.

From what I can deduce :
The 100mm CYC X1 option has a chainline at approx 60mm when the pedals are centered with the frame.
The 83mm option has a chainline at approx 50mm when the pedals are centered with the frame.

I believe the E55 chainline should be around 55mm.

The juggle is to get the chainline set up correctly with bike frame, and to also get the pedals to line up somewhat close to the centerline of the bike. I dont think I can achieve a perfect chainline and have a perfectly centered Q factor. So there will need to be some compromise.
 
Incase anyone else wants to know the mounting bolt spacing for the M620. This is straight out of the manual, with the addition of the actual measurements that I have calculated drawn in red, green and violet. For some reason Bafangs diagram doesnt actually specify the bolt hole measurements, relative to each other. Instead it is a few random measurements and angles.

I had thought they were nominal sizes of whole MM, But I was having some issues with my adapter design and found this.


1000034630.jpg
 
After many hours of work, I have finalised the bottom bracket adapter. I have tried to optomise the design as best as I can, I am still learning 3d modelling and am limited in what I can do. I believe the geometry will nessisitate a 5 axis machine.

I have aligned the pedals central to the frame, this forces the chainline out to approx 59mm. This puts the chainring directly inline with the highest gear (smallest cog) on the CYC HD cassette. Which will be ideal for that gear, but progressively less ideal in the lower gears. I rarely use the lowest gearing on my e22. And if it does become a problem, I believe it will be possible to space the chainring back to a lower chainline.

I have included 2 x M5 bolt hole lugs on the forward stays to match the X1s existing hardware. That way the motor end can be supported from the bracket, instead of an unsightly strap or U bolt over the frame.

1000034631.jpg1000034635.jpg1000034637.jpg1000034633.jpg1000034639.jpg1000034641.jpg1000034643.jpg1000034645.jpg
 
1000034764.jpg
1000034766.jpg


I have sent CAD files off for the copper bussbars to be manufactured. I have requested 0.5mm copper, with 0.15mm nickel spot weld tabs for each cell. Basically more or less the same as the common pre-made copper bussbars you see on aliexpress/alibaba etc, except with custom geometry to match my cell layout. I have also included tabs for the BMS balance conections, which align with the holes I have included in my custom CNC cell scaffold.

I am a professional HD auto-electrician by trade, and have a solid understanding of low voltage DC elctricity, but releatively low experience with building cylindrical lithium NMC cell batteries. I am happy with 0.5mm copper for the bussbars. The cross section area for the cell group series connections should be adequate. Approx 50-60mm wide x 0.5mm thick between each 3 cell grouping means approx 25-30mm2 of copper. Plenty thick enough for my anticipated 75a peaks. The tabs I have designed for the main +ve / -ve battery connections are 12mm wide. But also very short distance to the cell group, so this should be axceptable too.

However, I do have concerns about the 0.15mm nickel spot weld tabs. These are about 8mm wide, and held on with 4 tiny spot welds. And because the battery is only 3p arrangemnt, it means all the current must travel through only 3 of these nickle connections, and do it 21 x times in a row no less. Back of the envelope maths, 0.15mm x 8mm x 3cells = 3.6mm2, and thats nickel material too, not copper. Plus you have the individual spot welds. Not sure if these are resitive or ultrasonic, but in either case, its very low cross sectional area.

I have experimented with some used tool batteries, salvaging old 18650s and practicing my spot welding. And playing around with some pre-made 0.3 and 0.5mm copper bussbars. My current welder is a Gltter 801D and it can weld the 0.1mm / 0.15mm nickel tabs pretty well. But no chance with the copper directly. It can however put additional welds between the nickel tabs and the copper bussbar. So I will likely add additional spot welds there. I have noticed with some of my pre-made copper bussbars, some of the original spot welds between the copper and the nickel tabs are a bit cold. Doing some destructive testing with pliers, I found maybe 1 in 5 pulled away with relatively low effort. So a few extra spots in this location should be good insurance.

It should be pretty easy for me to rig up a test to run some actual current through some of these pre-made bussbars and see what happens. I expect them to handle the 25a peaks for short periods, but not at a high duty cycle. It will be interesting to see just how fast they generate heat.

I have also toyed with the idea of welding the copper directly to the cells. This will require a very powerful spot welder, and playing around with slotting the copper, flux, copper/nickel or copper/stainless sandwich techniques and alot of test/experiment welds to get the process dialed in and repeatable. It sounds like alot of extra work, for potentially small gains.
 
I had a resin 3d print made by PCBway, to test fitment and geometry. If it fits and lines up nicely, i will go ahead with a metal version. Likely go with SLM alsi10mg metal 3d print option, as it is looking to be an interesting manufacturing option. I will beef up the design, and add additional internal bracing that would be impossible to achieve via CNC.
 
Quick test fit of the adapter. Thankfully i went with a cheap resin prototype before commiting to the metal component. As there are some minor fitment issues i didnt catch. The bolt holes all line up perfectly. Bottom bracket is perfect fit for the X1 shaft, the forwards motor hangers have the motor body at the perfect height below the frame.

But unfortuantly, the legs that support the non-drive side slightly foul the frame because the side angle. I can re-design around this.

I put the cranks / pedals on and had a little test on the bike. That little pastic bracket was strong enough to support my entire body weight, which gives me confidence a metal version will handle riding abuse.

1000035145.jpg

1000035146.jpg

1000035147.jpg
 
I have ordered custom copper bussbar from 2 different vendors. Wellgo and EverBest battery. I went with 2 vendors as that way i could pick the highest quality option.

My Wellgo custom 0.5mm copper bussbars arrived today. One side is perfect. The other side has been manufactured incorrectly, with the weld tabs facing the opposite side. EDIT : Wellgo have agreed to send out replacement bussbars to replace the mirrored ones.
1000035268.jpg

1000035269.jpg


1000035270.jpg
 
Last edited:
I also got some slightly revised cell holders. These ones have 0.2mm extra diameter to hold the cells. As well as 0.2mm deeper cell bores, and 0.2mm deeper bussbar pockets. This gives more flexibilty to use various cells that arent always exactly 21 x70 in dimension.

And i got the bussbars from Ever Best Battery aswell. They too made the exaxt same error as Wellgo, and made one side in reverse. But Linda Chen at Ever Best was very good to deal with, and sent the correct bussbars very quickly. I am still waiting for the revised bussbars from Wellgo.

I have also made enquiries to have some insulators made to sandwhich between the bussbars and the case. Im looking at using 0.5mm Isoval 10 or 11, or an aramid fibre type of stiff paper/fabric type product of insulation product, and am in discussions with a local company to CNC cut them to suit.

1000035455.jpg
 
I have placed an order for some 0.5mm custom cut Isovolta Isoval 11 insulators to go between the bussbars and the battery case. Now just need to decide on which cells im using.
 
Next little head ache with the build is the CYC speed sensor has rather weird mount. It designed for universal conversions, and doesnt really fit the E55 chain stay very well. It has a flimsy cable tie mount, with lateral adjustment in the way of an unusual "H" slot, with a small grub screw to lock it.

The E55 already has its own dedicated speed sensor mounting boss, designed to suit the Bafang part. So I have designed up a small 3d printable bracket to adapt the CYC sensor into the standard mounting location on the E55 frame.

1000035554.jpg


1000035555.jpg


1000035557.jpg
 
Last edited:
I got the insulators today. 0.5mm Isoval 11 sheet, cut to suit. They used a CNC knife cutting machine, which i had never heard of, it leaves a slightly jagged edge, but it all fits perfectly.


1000035824.webp
 
Got a few little bits and pieces tidied up on the bike today. Swapped in a longer 58mm offset tripple clamp for slightly more steering angle. Finalised the layout for the bars, grips, brake levers etc. Swapped the gold Renthal bars out for black, and swapped grips over to the tan/gum coloured Race Face Gripplers. Everything laid out comfortably, and adjusted. A little bit cramped with shifter, throttle, brake and display on the right. But not really any worse than on the e22. I can get my thumb where it needs to be when I need to.

I put some yellow spiral wrap over the lines/cables, I was hoping for a slightly darker yellow, but thats all I could find on Aliexpress. Tidied up the cable routing into the frame. Bled the brakes with Formula fluid. Sized up the chain. Adjusted the derailer limit screws, and got the shifting all dialed in.

I even went for a little pedal around the yard to feel the bike out. No power ofcourse, but it was nice to feel the geometry, steering, brakes etc. Bike feels good, atleast in the seated posistion (didnt really want to try stand up pedalling on the plastic prototype bracket).

Its high, but its not bad. It doesnt feel like its that much bigger than the e22 considering this has 30mm larger forks, and 20mm taller bars. Fork feels good, think Ive got a pretty good spring rate in both the fork and rear shock. Up front is a 9.7nm / 55 pound coil. Rear is a 571 pound coil. Feels about right for what I like. I do have a couple of different size coils for both front and rear to play with if I need.

The lack of steering angle due to the dual crown isnt as bad as I was worried it would be. I can turn within my driveway, and a little speed and lean actually tightens the radius up further. I think it will be fine for most of the single track switch backs I will encounter. And if not, the bike can just monster truck over whatever I need it to.

Ive placed an order for the metal 3d printed motor bracket. I actually ordered 2, from different suppliers, as I want to check any difference in quality from different suppliers. I ordered from PCBway and Rapid Direct. Both AlSi10Mg aluminium selective laser sintered powder bed fusion process. Price was similar from each supplier, with the Rapid Direct a bit cheaper. The Rapid Direct part will also be anodized. I forgot to spec anodize on the PCBway order. PCBway have stopped accepting credit card payments aswell which made ordering a hassle. I suspect the US has told credit card providers to stop dealing with PCBway for some reason like defense or trade policy???

During quoting, Rapid Direct also said they will follow up and CNC machine the bores for the bolts and bottom bracket holes to dimension aswell. Which is a nice touch. I didnt get any threads specc'd in the order, as its something I can do once landed. The only threads are the 2 x M5s to mount the CYC motor. And then the 6 x M6 grub screws, 3 for each side of the BB to hold the bottom bracket snug. Unfortuantly, due to the Chinese spring festival period, I wont see either part until march.

20260214_144732.webp

1000035910.webp


1000035913.webp


1000035919.webp


1000035912.webp


1000035914.webp


1000035911.webp


1000035916.webp


1000035915.webp


1000035917.webp


1000035918.webp


Checked the head angle and seat angle out of curiosity. The 200mm fork and angle set were just a guestimate to get it somewhere close to rideable. I didnt really know how it would turn out until after it was all done.

Looking at the original advertised head angle of 64°, then fitting a 200mm fork, with a 1.5° steeper angle set has resulted in the frame tilted back approx 2°. The new head angle is pretty close to original now at 63.5°. Once you factor in a little more sag on the larger fork compared to the rear, it will probably settle at around the original 64°.

The seat tube measures 69°, but this cant really be compared to the original advertised seat tube angle of 77° as I am pretty sure that is effective seat tube angle measuring from BB to sest, not just the seat post as I have measured.

Head angle 63.45°.
1000035920.webp


Seat angle 69.25°
1000035922.webp
 
Last edited:
Keep reading
    Browse all

    Similar Threads

    Community Stats

    Since 2018
    668K
    Messages
    40,778
    Members
    Join 30,000+ Riders, it's free!
    Back
    Top